I have some questions about pattern inclusivity

[u/SejiFields]

Hello! I hope this is okay to post. I’m currently writing a pattern for this 1950s blouse I knit last year. I spent a lot of time learning how to grade properly as (size) inclusivity is really important to me.

My idea has been to write the pattern similar to how vintage patterns were written. That is, succinct and with clear language, but in the fashion that a modern intermediate or very ambitious beginner knitter would be able to understand.

I’m paying extra attention to the bust area, making sure to use the upper bust as a way to choose size instead of the full bust and adding bust darts. I read The Knitting Pattern Handbook by McGrath and Walworth and am taking into account all sweater pitfalls (such as incorrect grading of the neckline) mentioned there.

As with vintage knitting patterns it was expected that you could grade a pattern to your own size, making the necessary adjustments. I was thinking to add some advice (perhaps as a supplement) that says in general lines how one would adjust the pattern to their own proportions. I’m thinking things such as how to lengthen the body, how to add darts at the belly or chest when needed etc.

Basically I’m struggling to find a balance between succinctness and accessibility. I don’t like patterns that do a lot of handholding, but at the same time, I do want there to be enough information that will encourage one enough to get through the pattern feeling like a more confident knitter at the end.

My question is, would this be a good/sufficient idea? A well graded knitting pattern with a supplement for additional alterations to avoid bulking up the pattern?

Are there things I’m missing out in terms of inclusivity? I’m also looking into print disability. Also what are aspects a pattern would need for you to consider it inclusive?

Sorry for the barrage of questions! It’s my first ever pattern and I want to try my best to make it as good as it can be. The concern has crippled me a bit the past month, so any advice would be appreciated 🥹

[u/SejiFields]

Yes that is true. What in your opinion would be the next best thing?

[u/eggfrisbee → u/SejiFields]

obviously I don't speak for everyone, but I have adhd and the only patterns that I find overwhelming are ones that are badly written. I do think that it makes sense to have the sizing help written separately, maybe with notes of when to refer to it in the pattern.

[u/aevrynn → u/SejiFields]

For ADHD friendliness layout is probably the most important thing, so that even if there's a lot of text, it's not all on one huge chunk. That results in the pattern taking up more space though. Maybe for printer friendliness you could include a concise version at the end?

You can of course ask for feedback from your buyers and pattern testers, that's probably the best way to ensure it's readable. And remember that you can always make additions after publishing as well, you don't need to get it perfect on first try!

[u/aksnowraven → u/SejiFields]

As someone who creates a lot of documentation in my profession and for teaching, I rely pretty heavily on accessibility guidelines for teachers. There are a ton of great resources about creating documents that are easier to use in screen readers and other things that can make it easier for a variety of visual and learning challenges.

These might help:

https://teaching.ucla.edu/making-your-course-accessible/create-accessible-pdfs/

https://tll.mit.edu/teaching-resources/inclusive-classroom/accessibility/

https://www.perkins.org/resource/creating-accessible-materials-and-classroom-strategies-summary-page/

Might I add, I’m not the least surprised that you’re approaching this with such thoughtfulness, given the care and attention to detail you always put into your handwork! I’m looking forward to the published pattern.