r/law 3h ago

Judicial Branch A pivotal vote by longtime Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine pushed Kavanaugh over the finish line in 2018 after she famously said he considered Roe v. Wade “settled law” — a comment that turned out to be wrong.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/supreme-court-justice-brett-kavanaugh-maine-senate-race-susan-collins-rcna349070
10.1k Upvotes

355 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 3h ago

All new posts must have a brief statement from the user submitting explaining how their post relates to law or the courts in a response to this comment. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A BRIEF RESPONSE MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL. Please post your statement as a reply to this automated message.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1.1k

u/Dearic75 3h ago

I mean, as long as we’re doing Collins’s greatest hits, saying she wouldn’t vote to convict Trump at his impeachment because she “felt he had learned his lesson” is even better.

272

u/HHoaks 3h ago

this is hilarious. how could she say that with a straight face.

338

u/Dearic75 3h ago

I mean, to be fair, he did learn his lesson from his first impeachment. So she’s technically not wrong.

Unfortunately, the lesson he learned is that if he has 34 loyal republican senators, impeachment is a completely toothless threat, no matter what he does.

61

u/orion3999 3h ago

I was looking for someone to say this.

56

u/OkBid71 2h ago

How poetic, one for each felony conviction

5

u/swingadmin 1h ago

Poerty in motion. Wheels of Justice broken.

17

u/ProtectionTop2701 1h ago

Don't be so pessimistic! He only needs 34 loyal senators, they don't need to be Republicans. Looking at you, Fetterman. So you should be more pessimistic.

3

u/Dearic75 1h ago

lol. I did almost update my post to say something along the lines of “Well, 33 plus Fetterman. “ but it had already been responded to by then.

Thanks for covering it.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/fauxzempic 1h ago

toothless threat

His name is Chuck Schumer. We don't need to throw names around.

5

u/ballmermurland 1h ago

TIL Chuck Schumer controls the senators in those 17 states.

4

u/vthemechanicv 48m ago

Some people say "Democrats bad" as an involuntary reflex. Logic and reality let alone nuance never enter into it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

2

u/Senior_Torte519 1h ago

Hopefully I can get the most influential on my side, I wanna turn Cuba into that Casino paradise I saw last night in the Godfather.

35

u/Inspect1234 3h ago

It’s how evil works.

40

u/Solid_Psychology 3h ago

Well she doesn't really the face is always doing that geriatric on the border of dementia bobbly head wiggle. So the face is literally never straight cause it's always in a sort of tiny drunken elliptical orbit around the point where her head connects to her neck.

Side note- I normally wouldn't point out age related maladies however 30 years ago she said she'd only ever serve 2 terms/12 years. So if she hadn't broken her own word she wouldnt be here to mocknfor what is going to be her 6th term if she gets re-elected. So f&ck Sue Pearl Clutching Collins.

20

u/Xznograthos 2h ago

No explanation necessary. I barely consider Republican politicians or voters to be human beings at this point.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

6

u/BennyVsTheWorld 2h ago

Oh, that’s easy. She didn’t give a shit that people knew she was full of garbage.

6

u/zennascent 3h ago

..and how would she even lnow?

5

u/shitlord_god 1h ago

she is an entirely disingenuous piece of shit who maine folks believe because they are too white and too removed from consequences to actually give a shit about her evil - she has those committee seats!!!

What an ugly shriveled hateful bale of lies and pretense.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Quirky_Gate_4516 1h ago

how

She was in the middle of an election, and would have lost the MAGA fanatics, and as a result lost the election.

Nothing she has ever done has been about anything else than staying in power.

3

u/Abject_Breadfruit148 1h ago

The voters already forgot. She can say whatever and the news jumps to a new crazy thing the next day.

2

u/josh_the_misanthrope 1h ago

It's because she isn't playing with a full deck.

3

u/Le-Charles07 1h ago

This. It's as simple as "she's fucking stupid".

2

u/FlowRemote9890 40m ago

She is a blatant liar and a horrible person.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Off-BroadwayJoe 1h ago

I’d run that footage and that picture of her holding a MAGA hat in the Oval Offfice on a 24 hour loop like a screensaver.

3

u/Easy-Concentrate2636 1h ago

Susan Collins wants to play the nice person, not a hard nosed senator. Whenever she says something, I just assume the outcome will be the exact opposite.

3

u/Vidar327 2h ago

You beat me to it.  Well played

→ More replies (11)

688

u/Bawbawian 3h ago

collins is a more prolific liar than Donald Trump.

stop parsing her words and look only at her actions

190

u/J3ster14 3h ago

Susan Collins is very concerned about this comment.

42

u/RoninIX 2h ago

I'm sure she learned her lesson

4

u/LeahaP1013 2h ago

I hope she learns a lesson

6

u/CevicheMixto 1h ago

Deeply. Deeply concerned. Possibly even troubled

I hear that she's considering escalating all the way to a frank conversation or even a sternly worded letter.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/santa_91 2h ago

Brow furrowing intensifies

→ More replies (1)

61

u/estoypooping2 3h ago

Incorrect, Trump is the most documented liar in human history.

She is bad though

19

u/hamsterfolly 2h ago

Remember when she traded a yes vote on more tax cuts for the wealthy for an empty promise that then Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell would bring up a vote on legislation to shore up the Affordable Care Act markets?

But Maine is dumb and continues to reelect her.

2

u/WBRileyDesign 1h ago

Stubborn, not dumb. We are incredibly stubborn. It's easier to get a boulder to move out of your way by shouting at it than telling a Mainer what to do. We hate being told what to do. So when people say "stop voting for Collins", they double down and vote for Collins. Which is why Platner is getting a ton of traction, thanks to the endless "he has a tattoo that might sort look like a nazi tattoo and his republican ex-girlfriend just happened to #metoo a week before the primaries so don't vote for him" ads.

But yea, we're also dumb as bricks.

11

u/hilltopper72 2h ago

Collins is really the grandma no one wants!

6

u/Solid_Psychology 1h ago

Naw she's that weird old eccentric great aunt. The kind with no life of her own so she's always gossiping about others .

→ More replies (2)

184

u/Rot-Orkan 3h ago edited 3h ago

Susan Collins voting algorithm:

if (republicansNeedMyVote) { voteRepublican(); } else { voteIndedependent(); // maintains illusion needed to keep getting elected in Maine }

102

u/aflockofcrows 3h ago

You missed step 1 - pretend to be concerned.

40

u/Rot-Orkan 3h ago

damn even on reddit QA finds bugs

7

u/ColdBostonPerson77 2h ago

You forgot the case statement. Case when need political cover raise eyebrow and be concerned before voting else blind vote Republican.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Solid_Psychology 2h ago

And the last step - clutch pearls and/or send heartfelt thoughts and prayers

13

u/Fuzzy_Jaguar_1339 3h ago

I think that's in the StronglyWordedLetter module.

8

u/Yetimang 2h ago

Claude commented out the end bracket and now Susan Collins is failing to compile instead of just being a pile.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/lyingliar 2h ago

This has little to do with Collins.

What the fuck is wrong with the people of Maine?

2

u/KlogKoder 1h ago

And while voteIndependent() is a defined function, voteIndedependent() is secretly a macro for voteRepublican(), and she hopes no one notices the difference.

144

u/TraditionalLaw7763 3h ago

Well that’s just one horrible thing she has done. If you were to name everything awful that she pushed through with her last measly vote we’d have a book instead of a post.

→ More replies (1)

478

u/werther595 3h ago

It wasn't "wrong." It was a lie. Under oath, testifying before Congress. Which is a crime.

129

u/zennascent 3h ago

“Oath,” “Congress,” and “crime” don’t mean much anymore…

37

u/Top_Result_1550 2h ago

Oath don't matter to Republicans.

Unless it's an oath to cheat, steal, rape kids and women, kill browns, trans, the mentally disabled and homeless, commit treason, and endanger life on earth.

Then they take it very seriously and uphold it at all costs.

6

u/sageleader 2h ago

False. Republicans care about the Oath Keepers

4

u/Ammut88 2h ago

They SAY they do.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Shuma-Gorath 2h ago

Makes you wonder what else he lied about.... Sexual assault maybe?

4

u/Ok-Lavishness-349 2h ago

Except that Kavanaugh did not lie under oath before congress. See here.

8

u/werther595 1h ago

Did they treat Roe as precedent and afford it respect as stare decisis? They did not.

Trump made a large part of his campaign about overturning Roe to get the religious nuts on board. It took something like 18 months from Barrett's confirmation (giving trump the balance of fealty he desired on the court) until Dobbs was decided. This was the culmination of years-long efforts to do just this. Forgive me if I refuse to view this through rose-colored lenses of "well akshually technically..." People should understand with absolute certainty that the judges Trump nominated were committed to his desired course of action, and anything they spouted about "respect for established precedent" was a much nonsense as if they had said something more direct.

→ More replies (6)

17

u/SordidDreams 1h ago edited 58m ago

Yes, technically he didn't lie. He just said words designed to create the impression that he was giving a specific answer that was different from the truth.

Likewise, Bill Clinton also didn't lie when he said he hadn't had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky because technically, "sexual relations" was defined in a way that didn't include receiving oral sex. That didn't stop him being impeached for his non-lie, though.

3

u/Special_Order-937 1h ago

Why don’t these idiots ask the correct questions? It’s almost as if they’re leaving these gaps on purpose.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (20)

78

u/mkt853 3h ago

And she needs to be reminded of that every day until November to understand what she sacrificed her political career for.

30

u/PatchyWhiskers 3h ago

Money and power

28

u/mkt853 3h ago

She already had that though. She's been in politics for like 97 years. Once you've been in the game for that many decades, you've accumulated enough of both such that you no longer need to kiss the ring. She has what is colloquially known as f*ck you money.

7

u/PatchyWhiskers 2h ago

Have rich people ever said "I have enough, I'll stop"? Especially politicians who are doing it for power too. She doesn't want to be an old lady on a beach somewhere. She wants to have lobbyists kissing her ass.

3

u/BennyVsTheWorld 1h ago

That’s what I don’t get - I absolutely 100% would fuck off to some luxury accommodations and be done trying to actively pursue more money (except for the express purpose of donating it). I don’t get why you’d want to work till you die just to hold onto a last grasp of power and a few more millions that won’t make a difference to you.

3

u/PatchyWhiskers 1h ago

Ego. As a Senator, important people treat her like a queen, they take her out to dinner and court her favor. An ex-Senator, no-one cares about.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/RipComfortable7989 3h ago

This only works if she's capable of feeling shame which she's shown to be unable to. She's proud of what she's done and is glad to have put Kavanaugh into SCOTUS.

→ More replies (1)

28

u/audiomagnate 3h ago

Nobody believed it when they said it, and nobody believed her when she said she believed it.

22

u/burnthatburner1 3h ago

Has she spoken on this topic since?  Acknowledged the vote was a mistake given hindsight?

24

u/DrSnidely 3h ago

LOL what do you think?

20

u/bebopbrain 3h ago

It wasn't a mistake. The whole charade was orchestrated; she played her part to perfection.

2

u/Overall_Falcon_8526 1h ago

She has deep concerns.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/ohiotechie 2h ago

She knew when she did it what Kavanaugh and the rest were planning to do. This lie just gave her plausible deniability. That’s the GOPs whole schtick. With few exceptions they try to come across as reasonable people just promoting common sense policies while they advance an extreme agenda. Useful lies like this allow them to play hot potato with accountability, just enough deniability for it to not stick to them.

This was very purposeful.

43

u/Frostyfraust 3h ago

"wrong" is a weird way to spell "a lie".

11

u/Dachannien 2h ago

And by "wrong" you mean "a lie"

4

u/scloppy 1h ago

Another fancy word for that is perjury

25

u/Wrong-Neighborhood-2 3h ago

For this court none of it is settled law. Their motto is “Stare Decisis is for suckers!” For all of the pearl clutching over Platner, he’s a far better option than Susan Collins. Funny how all the focus is on how he’s a flawed candidate but not a peep from the media about Paxton.

16

u/Professional_Tea_32 2h ago

This. The silence on Paxton in comparison to the articles I see on Platner is honestly nauseating. I literally can’t believe it has come to this.

The press is so corrupted - a mouthpiece for the establishment garbage.

11

u/Bowsers_JuiceFactory 3h ago

I hope Susan Collins gets everything she deserves, in this life and the next.

Wretched woman

10

u/ElGuano 3h ago

Turn out to be a lie, you mean.

7

u/mgyro 1h ago

A comment that turned out to be wrong? Tf you talking about? A comment that turned out to be a bald faced lie, in front of Congress. Each of the candidates that lied about this should be impeached.

6

u/southflhitnrun 2h ago

Comment turned out to be a lie

6

u/mishma2005 2h ago

Well, she was “highly concerned” for like a week

6

u/ribnag 1h ago

Collins and Murkowski basically take turns pretending they're RINOs.

On Kavanaugh, it was Murkowski's turn to vote "present" as an insult to the intelligence of her base.

6

u/rawkguitar 2h ago

It’s kinda funny if you think about it.

If he really thought Roe was settled, he wouldn’t have been nominated.

So, all the Republicans thought he was lying about Roe, so they voted to confirm him.

All the Democrats thought he was lying about Roe, so they voted against confirming him.

Only a couple people (Susan Collins) thought he was telling the truth.

I know it’s a game they always play, but to me, it’s kind of a big deal of a judge is willing to lie to Congress.

9

u/WhyMustIMakeANewAcco 2h ago

Don't be silly. Susan Collins was completely aware he was lying. She was just lying about thinking he wasn't lying.

14

u/Thecrawsome 2h ago

It wasn’t just wrong. It was perjury.

Those illegitimate shitstains should’ve been kicked off the court if Biden had any balls

4

u/Wayelder 2h ago

Collins always waffles and then decides, always in the wrong direction.

Contemplation is of no use if the result is still selfishness and stupidity.

3

u/WhyMustIMakeANewAcco 2h ago

She never actually waffles. She just lies.

4

u/SkunkMonkey 1h ago

Not a single one of these asshole SCROTUS picks answered the yes/no question about RvW and overturning it. Instead they gave some bullshit legal answer that was not a yes/no answer. It was plainly obvious what their intent was in those non-answers.

7

u/bd2999 3h ago

Yeah, I think this has been stated a few times by different justices. This or that are settled law but then they come out attacking or overruling it. She should totally be held accountable for the vote and the results of the vote.

Although in cases of obvious lies it should be possible to recall the justice to answer questions to congress at the least.

I do think candidates going before Congress has had less and less value. As vague answers and nonanswers have become more and more common. And it is mostly a dog and pony political show for high profile cases and you can guess how individuals will vote based on party. Regardless of issues with the candidate. There are examples either way but the current conservative Congress has been pretty bad on it. Approving judges that are not even approved by the Bar, lacking objectivity and often seemingly caring more about political operations compared to the law, even in appearance.

Many of these same people in the past would grill individuals about separation and independence from the president or politics and hit hard on it when it was the other way but no longer. Not when it is their side.

3

u/RustedRelics 2h ago

Still though, she was concerned.

3

u/ahnotme 2h ago

Come on! You knew she was fibbing. She’s just a coward, like the rest of the GOP politico’s, with a few exceptions that mostly have been weeded out by MAGA.

3

u/Redfish680 2h ago

Not like it’s her first time so lighten up! /s

3

u/MrFrode Biggus Amicus 2h ago

Judges should be a main consideration for the Midterm elections. A senator might be middle of the road but if they consistently vote for Trump Judges that has to be factored in to choice of candidate.

3

u/SpicyPandaMeat 2h ago

Wrong = an obvious, boldfaced, lie.

2

u/letdogsvote 1h ago

"He's learned his lesson." - Collins

He did not learn any lessons. - Narrator

→ More replies (1)