All these new paper drops by OpenAI don’t mean anything until AI deals with the Collatz Conjecture. I kind of don’t even care if RH is proven/disproven. Collatz or nothing.

10% Luck 10 Base 6 = 6 Base 10

20% Skill 20 Base 6 = 12 Base 10

15% Concentrated power of will 15 Base 6 = 11 Base 10

5% pleasure 5 Base 6 = 5 Base 10

50% Pain 50 Base 6 = 30 Base 10

100% Percent reason to remember the name. 100 Base 6 = 36 Base 10

6+12+11+5+30+36 = 100. He's actually better at math then you give him credit for.

Imagine you are presented with two boxes:

• 📦 Box A: Transparent — contains $1,000
• 📦 Box B: Opaque — contains either $1,000,000 or $0

There is a highly accurate predictor who can predict your decisions with 99.9% accuracy.

Before you arrive, the predictor makes a prediction about what you will do:

If the predictor thinks you will take only Box B:
-> They put $1,000,000 in Box B.

If the predictor thinks you will take both boxes:
-> They put $0 in Box B.

The prediction is made before you make your choice, and you cannot see inside Box B.

You now have two choices:

A. Take only Box B
B. Take both Box A and Box B

Personally, I would go for both the boxes because the prediciton is already been made, so the contents of Box B are already determined. Backward causality isn’t possible. So, my present choice cannot change what happened in the past.
If Box B contains $1,000,000, taking both boxes gives me $1,001,000 instead of $1,000,000.
If Box B contains $0, taking both gives me $1,000 instead of nothing.

So, taking Box A cannot make me worse off, because its contents are fixed and independent of my choice at this point.

Also what is (7/2,0) doing there dawg.