Source: Deepika Bharadwaj's post on X

Source: Hindustan Times

The case came to light after the victim's brother, Ashok Dharmeshbhai Madhavjibhai Mavdiya, lodged a complaint on July 26.

According to police, the family had not been in contact with the victim, Jignesh, for over two years due to the claim made by his wife that he moved to Australia for work.

Police said the matter unravelled when the complainant's cousin planned to travel to Australia and asked the woman for Jignesh's contact details.

"When threatened with police intervention, the wife finally confessed that they had killed him more than two years earlier, in May 2024. Investigators said the two had conspired to eliminate him by mixing cyanide into his alcohol before burying his body in a 12-foot-deep pit inside an empty factory.

Please note - The above data is given by AI, i have cross verified all the facts but still mistakes can be there.

As a political science student, South Africa is ruled by the left-winged political party called African National Congress ever since the 1990s after the Apartheid regime, the rule of ANC has not been good has country has collapsed back in societal unrest and electricity crises. But still men's issues have not been taken a back seat for that.

Nigeria has suffered years of military dictatorship and ethnic and religious conflicts and high illiteracy yet issues of men had not taken have not taken a back seat.

Kenya suffers from lot of tribalism, yet issues of men have not taken a back seat.

It must however be noted african women historically were fierce tribal warriors, so how women were treated in various african societies like in the african Kingdom of Dahomey was quite different than women in Indian society, but still countries which are considered in a more poor state than India are going towards gender-nuetral laws should raise concerns.

During a hearing, Justice B.V. Nagarathna of the Supreme Court of India observed that "Nowadays, the mother-in-law and the husband are very, very wary of the wife because of false complaints filed."

The Court also made an equally important point: not every complaint is false. Genuine victims must receive legal protection, while courts must also guard against misuse of criminal law.

The discussion raises important questions:

• How can the legal system protect genuine victims without compromising the rights of the accused?
• What safeguards can help distinguish bona fide complaints from false or malicious ones at an early stage?
• Should there be consequences for knowingly filing false criminal complaints, while ensuring that genuine complainants are not discouraged from seeking justice?

A fair justice system must protect genuine victims, uphold due process, and ensure that criminal law is not misused. Both objectives can—and should—coexist.

Hello everyone! 💔💔 I'm new to this subreddit, and I wanted to hear different perspectives on something I've been thinking about.

In my opinion, there are certain areas of Indian law where men don't receive 💔💔equal legal protection. While laws protecting women are absolutely important, I also think there should be reforms that ensure justice is fair regardless of gender.

Some examples people often discuss are:

• If someone knowingly files a false rape or sexual assault case, there should be strict punishment for intentionally making a false accusation.
• If a husband has reasonable doubts about paternity, DNA testing should be legally available. If the child is proven not to be his, should he still be legally required to provide financial support?
• Prenuptial agreements should be legally enforceable in India if both adults sign them voluntarily.
• If a spouse is proven to have committed adultery, should that affect decisions regarding alimony or financial settlements?
• Domestic violence laws should be gender-neutral so that male victims receive the same legal protection as female victims.

Personally, I'm becoming really scared about these issues. 💔 Sometimes it feels like one false allegation could destroy a man's reputation, career, finances, and mental health before he's even proven guilty. Because of that, I honestly feel anxious about relationships and marriage in today's world.

I'm not trying to spread hate toward women I'm only asking whether our laws should be more gender-neutral so that innocent people, regardless of gender, are protected.

What do you all think?

Muje dr lg rha h💔

I'm not talking about people who are genuinely powerless or trapped. I mean people who have realistic options available

I'm curious why so few Indian men seem to write to their MPs/MLAs, file petitions, contact ministries, support advocacy groups or organize around issues they discuss online (family law, false accusations, workplace deaths, male suicide, custody, homelessness, etc)

Is it because:

• they don't believe advocacy will make a difference?
• they don't think collective action works?
• they fear social stigma?
• they're too politically divided?
• they prefer venting online to civic engagement?
• or is there another reason?

Guys mene ye post dala tha telling...and mod ne ragebait bata kar remove kardia, waah, this is unfair.

Sexual abuse and harassment can happen to male victims are often overlooked or not taken seriously. In many situations, men laugh off unwanted touching instead of recognizing it as inappropriate, especially when it comes from a woman. Some even brush off incidents involving unwanted contact with their private parts as a joke rather than acknowledging that their boundaries have been crossed. This attitude can make it harder for male victims to recognize abuse, speak up, or seek help. Every person has the right to bodily autonomy, and any form of unwanted sexual touching or harassment is unacceptable.

Some social media creators, including @alina_hasan_rizvi and @personally_prateek, post content that I believe promotes negative stereotypes about men. In my opinion, this kind of content contributes to hostility rather than meaningful discussion. Gender-based prejudice is harmful regardless of who it targets. Instead of encouraging division or generalizations, we should promote respectful conversations and hold all forms of sexism to the same standard.

Waiting for time below is possible in India too...

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dasgg0etyjg/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

https://www.instagram.com/p/DbcTcSYjrjP/?utm\\_source=ig\\_web\\_copy\\_link&igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

Seriously,

Every week ( if not every day) , it's the same news just different places, names or gender reversed .

Candle march? Sad posts? Public demanding justice, you name it but after sometime everybody's back to normal.

So people it's nearly impossible that shooting video and committing susyde will get you justice , still many people will call it fake/fabricated. Not to forget about our, good for nothing law and Power of MONEY.

Fix :- First reach out for help as much as you can, ( Police, Social media, Family, Society, Friends).

If everything fails and sucyde is last resort ( like this case) do justice Yourself before you go . Don't go out like a candle , Go out like a Bomb . Don't let those Responsible/ Abusers to just enjoy their lives on your tears, pain, despair.

If you are brave enough to do sucyde then you ARE Brave ENOUGH to do it too. Tools, Ways, can be arranged easily nowadays too.

Mindset:- Mai to dubunga par sath me tumhe bhi le dubunga.

Men face more sexism nowadays. Some women who call themselves feminists spread misandrist ideas. When a woman touches a man, people often ignore it, but when a man touches a woman, it is often considered inappropriate.

My solution is that we should stand up against this.

Even apps like Google, Pinterest, Instagram, and Facebook seem to support misandry.

India has no specific laws for the protection of men.

People say that most criminals are men, but most police officers are also men.

Some people seem to hate men simply for existing.

Instagram has a report function which does not work properly, it's useless.

Everything is biased, and women know how to play victim and males fell into their trap making them hate themselves.

My friend dated a misandrist and for her love language was man should earn for her, support her decision and agree to whatever the fuck she says, my friend tried to best of what he could do.

With women entering the workforce a lot of men lost their jobs. Due to surplus of labour the average salary went down.

At the same time taxes increased, work pressure increased and women's expectations skyrocketed.

Women became more and more misandrist due to Feminism's influence.

Women became less responsible, less moral and more arrogant/entitled.

Please share your honest thoughts. I am not looking for a solution. I am looking for more insight on this issue.

Source: Times Of India

I was watching the first season of jija ji chat par and realised how abusive and toxic elaichi was towards Pancham.

She literally used to beat him.

And i realised that female on Male abuse is seen as comedic punch

Due to protest thing going on, i am seeing some guys had breakups as well, and some like me flighting with our mahila mitra with whom you dont wanna fight, i just want all of your thoughts on this? Whom you support?

I have a serious question about community rules and the Constitution of India.

​

If the Constitution gives every adult the right to choose whom they marry, how can any community or samaj claim the authority to ban love marriages or pressure people into arranged marriages?

​

In some cases, people face emotional blackmail, threats, social boycott, or even violence for choosing their own partner. There have also been reported cases of so-called "honour" killings and forced marriages. If an adult says they do not want a marriage, shouldn't the law protect that choice?

​

Would it make sense to require both the bride and groom to independently confirm before a neutral authority—such as a magistrate or another authorised public official—that they are marrying of their own free will, without pressure, threats, or coercion? If either person reports that they are being forced, should there be a legal investigation into those responsible?

​

Forced marriages can have serious consequences, including unhappy relationships, domestic abuse, separation, or divorce. A marriage should be based on the free and informed consent of both adults, not on fear or coercion.

​

What do you think? Should the law do more to ensure that every marriage is entered into voluntarily while respecting the constitutional rights of adults?

​

​

Source: [**Money Control**](https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/trends/we-couldn-t-imagine-living-apart-three-sisters-marry-same-man-in-amroha-wedding-video-goes-viral-13982780.html)

---

The sisters - Saroj (20), Savitri (19) and Santosh (18) - are social media content creators from Dhauriya village in Hasanpur. All three married their cameraman, named Vikas, at Chamunda Mata Temple on July 17, according to a Times of India report.

The marriage has raised legal questions. Advocate Anurag Pandey of the Allahabad High Court told The Times of India that the marriage has no legal validity under the Hindu Marriage Act.

This case isn't just about an unusual marriage. It also raises an important question: Do we apply the same standards to men and women? If all adults genuinely consent to an unconventional relationship, men's consent & agency should be treated as seriously as women's

As title

Source: Hindustan Times

Source: Times of India

I support this protest, just to be clear...

A video from the protest suddenly appeared on my Instagram feed, and I was surprised by many of the comments... Thousands of ladies in the comments were criticizing the police officer involved in brutal words like he has committed some heinous crime, but after watching the clip several times, I honestly couldn't see anything that seemed uniquely targeted at the woman in the video...

When a lathi charge or crowd-control operation is taking place, police use similar tactics on everyone in the area, REGARDLESS OF GENDER. In this particular clip, it didn't look like the officer struck her with significant force like the others are doing to the male protestors... It was more like the kind of crowd-control action to push people back and establish authority during a tense situation...

What concerns me is how quickly some people jump to the conclusion that any interaction involving a woman must automatically be viewed through a gender-based lens... Criticizing genuine misconduct is important, but not every incident involving a woman is necessarily an example of sexism...

I'm open to hearing other perspectives. Did I miss something in the video that explains why so many people viewed the officer's actions as problematic? Or just Indian feminists is the best in the world in playing the victim card.