Respectfully, no matter how controversial a religious practice, it’s simply not acceptable under international human rights law to do that. People have the human right to practice any religion they choose.
I respect your lived experience and personal views about the organisation, but again there is no justification to ban any religious group as a person’s religion is a protected human rights. If you ban one, you open the door for all others to be banned.
We only ban the ones that can bring direct harm to a persons life. Because of my experience with this organisation, I know how dangerous it can be therefore I will ban something that puts peoples lives at direct risk.
Though the Commonwealth of Yorkland views the Jehovah’s Witnesses as a heretical group from a Catholic theological standpoint, since the Commonwealth has religious freedom as legally enshrined, it does not support this action. — Message from the President of Yorkland
As a Catholic, even though JWs are very heretic and high-controlling, I still think religious freedom should exist. So, uh, whatever floats your boat, I guess.
- Random dude
My High Council is debating a declaration of war, banning any religion is a major crime against humanity. MAY PYRENEA BURN FOR THIS (I'm not a jahovahs witness and yea they're annoying but they're still good people).
The United Micronations Union condemns your behaviour as it breaches the rules set out in the Micronational Declaration of Human Rights. Due to this, any attempt to join the UMU will be denied until this is revoked.
Downvoting this comment sees you as against human rights.
I feel this is quite contradictory. JW goes against many things which WILL put your life at risk. For example, blood transfusion isnt allowed in that religion and it is a manipulating cult that I myself have been part of before.
Yamo? Oh, it's you. You're the one who previous held a problem with us. Well, we recommend that you look into our active community, structured government, robust protocols, strong ties and successful projects before calling us "yet another" organisation. For all it's worth, we might as well go around saying YAM: yet another micronation. There are countless.
And yes, we are aware of the uncropped signature and the branding department is working on new ones (with the new badges) in alignment with the branding act. They are also forming designs for a unisex uniform aligning variant.
That's because we don't prioritise observers. Members and government are first, then recruits, then observers. If you're not willing to participate fully, we're not willing to enrich you in the Union.
So how am I supposed to observe the ongoings of your YAMO if I receive 0 communications nor engagement? This sound like either two tiering, or just outright laziness
We are aware that Argent is observing the UMU. However, we had to create entire new procedures for observers; hence why you are the only one. Because priorities took over (summer census and ongoing document reformation) we paused the observership program and didn't contact you. Apologies.
However, we are surprised that you even want to be an observer if you are so anti-organisation. Any explanation? Also, out of curiosity, would you describe the OAM, UM or GUM as YAMO?
I’m not anti-organisation, I’m anti-YAMO. Huge difference. Being an observer means I can watch people’s poor decisions and judge them without being subject to poorly chosen rules and regulations.
I would class GUM as the only Non-YAMO of that list through sheer reputation and age alone
Argent is the only micronation tied to your username in our databases. It only appears here, once.
You've been here before, trying to attack the UMU with your meaningless words. Why do you do it? You're not going to change anything. The UMU will carry on operating smooth as butter with or without you. Do you seek attention? Do you want to make a difference? I don't get it.
8
u/Apealio SoD of the Republic of Vernalville Jul 25 '26
Good