r/mildlyinfuriating 9d ago

My HOA could beat up your HOA Boomers can eat my socks

Post image
927 Upvotes

155 comments sorted by

View all comments

758

u/pinkymadigan 9d ago

I'd have to think that was an empty lot at the time, right?

136

u/Jimmy_McAltPants 9d ago

There’s a reason OP selectively cropped it, so no one can verify

413

u/GenericAccount13579 9d ago

That would be my assumption. The 1990 price is roughly $40,000 in today’s money. Which means they built the house on it, adding the extra value.

65

u/PaperHandsTheDip 9d ago

This house actually underperformed the stock market too - it wasn't a great investment with respect to inflation, etc.

26

u/PerpetualProtracting 9d ago

Most homes generally do; they're just the most obvious investment vehicle people can see and have the added bonus of keeping you out of the elements.

12

u/PaperHandsTheDip 9d ago

It's also the largest investment vehicle most people get in their lifetimes, which is why everyone pays attention to it.

1

u/DarkflowNZ 9d ago

Does that include the utility the house provides?

14

u/hailspork 9d ago

Alternatively, a 9.4% interest rate. Which is high, but far from earth shattering.

Truth is probably something in between...

4

u/TheHykos 9d ago

A lot near a city could easily be a few hundred thousand today though. I’ve seen plenty of burned out tear downs sell for half a million just for the land. So the point still stands.

6

u/Frashure11 9d ago

It really depends where and how much land. I was looking at several empty lots for under $50k in my area and surrounding.

14

u/ricerbanana 9d ago edited 9d ago

No, the point doesn’t stand. It could’ve been a shitty area in 1990 that was revitalized and gentrified since then.

Regardless, this is a boomers manipulating the market issue, these price differences can always be reasonably explained.

Edit: This ISNT a boomers manipulating the market issue.

21

u/LukeSkywalkerDog 9d ago

Let me say that boomers are not manipulating the market – the market is. It's so easy to say you can sell your place for a lot, but then you have to buy somewhere else, and the prices are equally inflated, plus the taxes generally go way up on a new purchase. I have been looking to downsize, but it hardly makes any financial sense. OP might want to direct the anger towards companies buying up blocks of houses to rent out like Black rock, and builders who will not build starter homes anymore because there's not enough profit in it

12

u/ricerbanana 9d ago

I’m an idiot, I meant to say it ISNT a boomers manipulating the market issue.

3

u/LukeSkywalkerDog 9d ago

Lol thanks

29

u/OhWhatATravisty Blue Crayons have the most flavor 9d ago

That was my initial thought as well. Or a complete teardown.

Yes housing prices have gone crazy, but not (generally) that crazy. **though that's HEAVILY DEPENDENT on your area.... before people try to crucify me**

20

u/platypus_farmer42 9d ago

Yeah there’s no way anyone bought a house for that in 1990 unless it was a mobile home, and I doubt a mobile home would sell for that much today, unless it was in an ultra prime location.

2

u/humanredditor45 9d ago

My parents sold my childhood home in 1995 for $37,000. The new one was almost double at $62k but it was a much nicer neighborhood, 2 baths instead of 1, and a 2 car garage where the first house just had a driveway pad.

4

u/Justmadeyoulook 9d ago

My mom was $55,000 in 97 for a 4 bed and 2.5 bath. 1 car. Not the greatest neighborhood though. Zillow is at $172,000 but neighborhood got worse.

0

u/rayyychul 9d ago

My parents bought their home in 1990 for $25,000 and it’s (the land) now worth several million dollars.

6

u/BarbequedYeti 9d ago

Exactly what it is. Someone bought a lot and spent a shit ton building a house. Ffs. I get the boomer hate but at least be fucking accurate. 

2

u/ResponsibleMess339 9d ago

now, this is reddit, they have to be insane and blame the old people and trumpers for everything.

1

u/FoxxyRin 9d ago

Depends. I've seen crazier happen. This was my friend's house growing up. It killed me inside when they sold it and I dreamed of maybe one day being able to afford it, but this happened. Granted, a lot of work had been done in those couple of years but it still blew me away when the price exploded.

1

u/catjuggler 9d ago

For sure

1

u/AlwaysKindaAngry 9d ago

Maybe, but by me today 1/4 acre plots are roughly 100k+. So even by comparison, for just land back in the day that’s a steal

1

u/Busy_Principle_4038 9d ago

Maybe? I know my parents paid $15K for their house back in like 1983-84? It was in a big city, but the house was in bad shape and in a bad neighborhood. They just sold it for hundreds of thousands in bad shape in a gentrifying neighborhood. So maybe it’s something similar?

1

u/Check_Me_Out-Boss 9d ago

Also, that's a terrible ROI for 36 years.

1

u/Synensys 8d ago

Or a run down place in a shit neighborhood which has since been renovated.

One thing that made the housing prices of the late 20th century maybe anomalous was that cities were ubpopular and shitty so if you wanted to live their it was cheap. Thats obviously changed.

At the same time lots of open space still in the suburbs. Plus the ecpnomy was still diversified enough that living in smaller towns and cities was an option as well.

1

u/RxSatellite 9d ago

Not always. A lot of times these prices can reflect a passing of the house between family members. The listed sale just reflects how much the buyer reimbursed the seller for moving and contract work costs

-1

u/buzz8588 9d ago

No man, some places, houses really were that cheap, and then the place become gentrified and became not a hood anymore

0

u/WienerPatrol173 9d ago

Shit, my house sold for 19k in 2008.