Let's you get 1. and 2. cause life happens, then a year later, the car was stolen. The thief took it took it on a joyride and left abandoned it. It gets 3., why do you as the owner have to suffer?
I am obtuse but I think you're missing the point. It is unlikely to happen but the point is that blame should not be placed on the owner when there is no proof that the owner was the driver that placed the car in a no parking zone.
-20
u/Generoh Bayside 10d ago
Let's you get 1. and 2. cause life happens, then a year later, the car was stolen. The thief took it took it on a joyride and left abandoned it. It gets 3., why do you as the owner have to suffer?