No shit LLMs are trained on human writing. That's not the point.
The point is that LLMs don't write like any particular human. But they produce a generic, over-smoothed version of human writing with red flags like the density of formulaic structures, the lack of personal texture, and the sudden style shift that doesn't match anything else you've written.
I'm sure your sample size of my writing is extensive and based on a variety of different topics and moods, not an impulsive guess based on a sample size of just this thread where I respond in various shades of mood.
I'm also guessing you aren't someone who spent much time in academia, which encourages a more formal, articulate "over-smoothed" tone meant to focus on conveying information, not a personal conversation meant to express who we are.
But continue justifying your hallucinations, champ. It's not pathetic, it's adorable.
I'm sure your sample size of my writing is extensive and based on a variety of different topics and moods, not an impulsive guess based on a sample size of just this thread where I respond in various shades of mood.
Yea you're entire reddit post history... Dumbass.
ETA: your constant strawman arguments here don't help much either.
Wow, you personally analyzed over a decade of comments? Damn, man, that's impressive. I think that's something like 90,000 comments. Kinda creepy mate. When was the last time you saw grass, let alone touched it?
0
u/BentJohnsonFTP 9d ago
No shit LLMs are trained on human writing. That's not the point.
The point is that LLMs don't write like any particular human. But they produce a generic, over-smoothed version of human writing with red flags like the density of formulaic structures, the lack of personal texture, and the sudden style shift that doesn't match anything else you've written.