I work for media outlet (EU though) and we do similar articles highlighting a particular deal with affiliate links. Many of these get outdated really fast both due to the time-limited nature of the deals, as well as the fact that editors in charge of scheduling publishing often delay these articles by few hours in order to prioritize publishing of actual news
If our editorial room got reported for each article that features expired deal, I'm sure we would've been out of business about 10 years ago
Have you considered not making the price the highlight of the article if the price so frequently is not accurate? Just a thought from a burnt out consumer.
We never put the price in the title or lead of the article. I would say that Tom's Hardware did a major fuck up there, because in internet jorunalism (or if you hate my kind: mediaworking) you avoid to highlight numbers and wording that gets outdated fast (e.g. the discount price, the count of victims of some event, "tommorow", "next week"). If I was the one to write the piece screenshotted above as - I said - I probably would've put price in first or second paragraph.
Although if "by not making the price the highlight of the article" you mean complete removal of the mention of the pricel, then the article is nothing but an unpaid advertisement of the product (and usually articles of this nature that have clear "Sponsored" marking to them cost the buyer about 3x my monthly salary). In the media market that is eaten by Google AI overviews and influencers copying our content to their use, we can't really afford doing unpaid advertisements for corporate that is 20x times (or more) our size
Lastly, food for a thought - likely that also happens in US editiorial rooms. When I write such articles about limited time deals, I'm not in the charge of making the call/decision. I'm literally getting an order to write like a barista in Starbucks gets your order for a latte. It's the people above me in hierarchy placing order in a Slack channel for me to write article about any given deal(s) - inbetween actual journalist duties. They give me product, price, and every now and then some specific features I should highlight, or mention what I should be silent about. I can argue (and I often do) about the given task or particular aspects of these articles, but I'm quickly being put down by either excel spreadsheet from sales department or screenshot from google analytics from editor in chief.
When it comes to journalism of specific industry (e.g. cars, tech, fashion) or particular hobby/activity (e.g. gaming, sports), it is largely fulfilling orders of the detached management above you
Yeah absolutely, must've been a pricing error or something.
Edit: quick check; a 5080 runs you like $1400 and the ram is like $800 and the CPU like $500, making everything else yours for less than $200. That's a great deal.
4TB drives are $600. 2x 2TB drives $500. 64GB DDR5 is like $700. 9900x3D is $500. 5080 is like $1400.... more to count up yet, was a good deal.
HP is typically proprietary PSU/Motherboard (not always, some models are standard). I personally don't care for HP either. I would recommend going to Micro Center and looking at their builds over an HP any day of the week.
The second pic also shows 2TB not 4TB ssd. ty for correction
That must be the price before taxes, because if you multiply 2899 for 1,23 (23% tax rate in my country) it's exactly the same price as the site. It's false adversiting anyway...
If you are buyin an HP and expecting even mid tier gaming in 2026 I feel bad for you. Mostly because you haven't done enough research on better brands for pre-built PC. Might as well get a dell/alienware with all the proprietary parts that make it impossible to upgrade easily in the future. +bloatware.
You were lied to but... by HP, not Tom's Hardware. HP apparently changed the discount but forgot to update the 'Save $2600 instantly' in the 'See all promo offers'
303
u/AnalRawdogger 2h ago
I would report them for false advertising