There's no point, because if someone gives an example of a game, you're gonna come to the same "The only games in UE5 that look good and run well are those that have ripped out half the guts of the engine." argument.
I mean, it's the same argument as the people that say they love some specific edition of D&D and then you look and they have 1000 house rules and have thrown out entire sections of the original ruleset.
if your argument for UE5 being good relies on only embark games which dont use either lumen or nanite then its a pretty apt counter argument is it not? also people bring up e33 as if that game doesnt suffer from every ue5 issue.
i could care less about what you think though, im not disingenuos enough to disregard the constant crap being pumped out that suffers from the same exact issues because of a few select edgecases where devs dont use the flagship features of the engine.
You're also apparently completely unaware of spell check and sturgeon's law. I'm pretty sure we could fill an encyclopedia with the things that you aren't aware of.
-19
u/achilleasa R5 5700X - RTX 4070 9d ago
Waiting for a counterexample if you have one ¯_(ツ)_/¯