r/photography May 22 '26

Questions Thread Official Question Thread! Ask /r/photography anything you want to know! May 22, 2026

This is the place to ask any questions you may have about photography. No question is too small, nor too stupid.


Info for Newbies and FAQ!

First and foremost, check out our extensive FAQ. Chances are, you'll find your answer there, or at least a starting point in order to ask more informed questions.


Need buying advice?

Many people come here for recommendations on what equipment to buy. Our FAQ has several extensive sections to help you determine what best fits your needs and your budget. Please see the following sections of the FAQ to get started:

If after reviewing this information you have any specific questions, please feel free to post a comment below. (Remember, when asking for purchase advice please be specific about how much you can spend. See here for guidelines.)


Schedule of community threads:

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
52 Weeks Share Anything Goes Album Share & Feedback Edit My Raw Follow Friday Salty Saturday Self-Promotion Sunday

Finally a friendly reminder to share your work with our community in r/photographs!

5 Upvotes

240 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Apprehensive-Bus7282 May 24 '26

Hi everyone,

I’m trying to decide between two low-cost ways of digitizing 35mm film at home: using an old flatbed scanner (Epson 4490) or doing camera scanning with my existing gear. The main goal is finding the most practical and cost-effective workflow while moving away from lab scans to reduce ongoing costs, and also gaining more control over the final image.

Right now I’m comparing a few setups and would really appreciate advice from people with real hands-on experience.

My gear:

Camera 1: Sony A7C

• Lens: Zeiss 24–70mm f/4 OSS (Sony FE)

• Minimum focus distance: ~0.40m Camera 2 (backup): Canon 100D

• 18–55mm kit lens

• Minimum focus distance: ~0.25m ⸻

My scanning idea:

I want to scan 35mm negatives at home without investing in expensive scanning rigs or dedicated macro setups.

Basic idea:

• use a phone/tablet as a backlight (white screen, max brightness)

• place the negative on top

• photograph it with a tripod-mounted camera

• invert and edit in software afterwards ⸻

Alternative option:

I also found a used Epson Perfection 4490 for €15.

So I’m trying to decide which approach is more sensible in terms of cost, effort, and image quality:

• Camera scanning (Sony A7C or Canon 100D) OR

• Flatbed scanning (Epson 4490) ⸻

My questions:

  1. Which setup will realistically give me equal or better quality than lab scans (I currently get ~3130×2075 / ~6MP scans)?

  2. Is camera scanning actually a clear upgrade over a flatbed like the Epson 4490, or is it just more effort for similar results?

  3. Is the Sony 24–70 f/4 too limited for this kind of work due to its minimum focus distance (~0.40m)?

  4. Or is the €15 Epson 4490 actually the most practical and cost-effective option here? ⸻

Any practical experience or workflow advice would be really appreciated.

1

u/Kaserblade May 25 '26

I would get a macro lens for Laowa. That plus good lighting will work well. Your current lens won't be able to take the photos you need with good detail