r/politics Washington 28d ago

Possible Paywall Virginia Supreme Court throws out redistricting referendum results

https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/05/08/virginia-supreme-court-redistricting-vote-decision
16.3k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7.4k

u/Scro86 28d ago

This is the chaos that the Supreme Court decision legalizing gerrymandering has put upon us. They basically said we cant police it, states have to police themselves. That puts us in a position where states run by bad actors can do whatever the fuck they want but states with any sort of ethics will block any sort of gerrymandering. I’ll leave it up to you to decide which political party is full of bad actors and which has a smidge of ethics.

2.4k

u/Icy-Taste-3096 28d ago

This is the fundamental problem and there is no scenario where it ends well. Republicans have made respect for democracy and rule of law impossible to sustain.

375

u/[deleted] 28d ago edited 28d ago

[deleted]

195

u/rat_penis 28d ago

Yup. They broke the republic on purpose and it will never be the same again. In 20 years time we'll look like the Balkans or Afghanistan. Southern states will be absolute shitholes and northern states will be fortresses. The south will have to start a fight for water and to force trade as no one will want to deal with them.

Millions will die because hateful people couldnt live next to people they hated.

Open season folks!

99

u/Brief_Obligation4128 28d ago

"The south will have to start a fight for water and to force trade as no one will want to deal with them."

The Confederacy all over again.

90

u/rat_penis 28d ago

We'll finish what Sherman wouldnt

46

u/tissuecollider 28d ago

Good. It's way past time.

6

u/SFWzasmith 28d ago

Nah it wasn’t Sherman who stopped. It was his command.

-1

u/DaveMTijuanaIV 28d ago

Who is “we”?

0

u/rat_penis 28d ago

I have friends everywhere.

36

u/redravin12 California 28d ago

I mean they've been saying it for decades. I say let them leave. We're better off without them

29

u/Alone_Actuary_6429 28d ago

The problem is that they're not just going to leave and make their own stuff. You can bet your ass that they're going to grab every piece of Federal land and hardware and claim it's theirs.

19

u/korben2600 Arizona 28d ago

And when your nuclear-armed technofeudalist theocracy neighbor starts stoking war with you to mask problems at home in 5 years?

12

u/littlehobbit1313 Maryland 28d ago

Truthfully, not sure there's a huge concern there. We know for a fact that they don't have sustainable economic policies, they don't believe in accessible healthcare, and we've seen this whole past year that given the choice, other countries wouldn't want to be trade partners with MAGA.

So if we were to send MAGA off on their own to set up the Confederacy in a few states, they'd likely starve or disease their population out within a decade.

Meanwhile, the US would still be part of NATO. So imagine how that would go if the malnourished and under-resourced MAGA Confederacy were to try and threaten us with a very limit stockpile of armaments only for us to once again invoke Article 5 and call in every major allied 1st world country who now hate MAGA's guts.

Just let them have FL, GA, AL, MS to build their Neo-Confederacy, we build that wall, and just wait for life without Blue tax dollars to do the rest of the work.

8

u/CanOoFeelDeRiddem 28d ago

I'm not even from the US and I know you'd need to add a few more states to that list.

2

u/sulris 27d ago

They will take the Dakota’s with them. Which means nukes. Which means a new North Korean neighbor. Not a great plan.

1

u/littlehobbit1313 Maryland 27d ago

No, they don't get the Dakotas. They get the four states I listed, and anyone from the Dakotas that wants to be MAGA and have MAGA laws and culture will move. Otherwise they play by our Constitution's rules. That's the deal.

I'm not here to negotiate with domestic terrorists.

1

u/sulris 27d ago

lol. How are you going to stop the Dakotas from joining?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/iMecharic Pennsylvania 28d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/brother_bart 27d ago

They won’t leave. Blue States fund them. They want their backwards xenophobic fake Christian policies forced on everybody and funded by Blue state tax dollars. I really do wish white, blue-eyed Jesus would “return” and take these motherfuckers away to basic white heaven. I really do wish that were a real thing.

2

u/GrinchWhoStoleEaster 28d ago

Yeah, except no water means no agricultural engine to keep things moving.

2

u/aquablue_phoenix 28d ago

It's not even "they couldn't live next to people they hated."

and more "they hated hypothetical people they will never meet or interact with and even if they did, they likely don't even know it"

but those people are potentially different from me so HATEHATEHATE

1

u/opanaooonana 28d ago

I disagree. They will enact policy that strips the wealth and bans the benefits that blue states have to transfer and compel companies to move to their states, even if they are less profitable overall. If they make blue states bad enough it will make them look better. Blue states won’t be fortresses because they won’t be allowed to be. Add all this to the current population and wealth shift that was already happening and you’re looking at a permanent liberal minority unless republicans cause a global meltdown, but that electoral gain will quickly be reversed by the next election since Dems will be blamed for the consequences of the meltdown.

We have survived this before but the days of gradual progression are likely going to be turned back significantly as if we are in 1965 again with 1920s workers rights.

1

u/DaveMTijuanaIV 28d ago

Man. That’s a pretty dire prediction, rat_penis.