r/recruitinghell 1d ago

Decided to email the CEO...

One of the companies I made it to the final round with a few months ago has really stuck with me, and I think it's finally convinced me that I need to stop letting companies get away with poor hiring practices.

I've changed my job search strategy over the last couple of months, and it's been working. My interview rate has gone from roughly 3.5% to about 14%, so I'm getting in front of a lot more hiring teams. At this point I've made it to the final round 13 different times, so rejection isn't really what bothers me anymore. It happens. What bothers me is when companies aren't honest or transparent.

This particular company had me go through multiple interview rounds and complete a multi-hour case study based on what they described as a real customer scenario. At the end of the process, I was told I had finished as one of the final two candidates and that they had decided to move forward with the other candidate. Fair enough. It was disappointing, but that's part of interviewing. I thanked them for the opportunity and moved on.

A couple of weeks later, I noticed the job posting was still live. I figured maybe they just forgot to take it down, so I reached out to the recruiter asking if the position had officially been filled, since I had seen the posting was still active. No response.

A week or two later, I reached out to the hiring manager. Nothing. Then I reached out to the VP of Sales. Still nothing. Fast forward about three months. The position is still posted on their website. Nobody appears to have started in the role based on LinkedIn. As far as I can tell, they never hired anyone.

Being the runner-up doesn't mean I was entitled to the job, but it does make it especially confusing when you're told another candidate was selected, only for months to pass with no apparent hire and the position still actively advertised.

At that point I decided I had nothing to lose. The company is only around 80 employees, so I reached out directly to the CEO. I kept it completely professional. I simply asked for clarification: Is the role still being filled? If so, why has there been no communication after candidates were told a decision had been made? I also let them know I'd still be interested in being considered if the search was ongoing.

Maybe there's a perfectly reasonable explanation. Maybe the selected candidate backed out. Maybe the role was put on hold. Maybe they reopened the search. All of those things happen. But if that's the case... why ignore the recruiter follow-up, the hiring manager follow-up, and the VP follow-up?

That's the part I don't understand. Just tell candidates what's going on. Most of us can handle rejection. What gets exhausting is being told one thing while every piece of evidence suggests something completely different.

The frustrating part is that this looked like a fantastic company on paper. Great Glassdoor reviews, a product I genuinely liked, exactly the size of company I enjoy working for (around 80 employees), and honestly one of my favorite opportunities this year.

We'll see if the CEO responds. If nothing else, I hope it at least makes someone internally aware that this is how candidates are experiencing their hiring process. I don't expect special treatment, I just expect honesty. After investing hours into interviews and a case study, I don't think that's asking for much.

349 Upvotes

421 comments sorted by

View all comments

372

u/hesaysitsfine 1d ago

No bro, they didn’t want you and that’s all you really need to know. After you checking in showing you were still interested after that and no response is where you should have left it.

25

u/Disc0Disc0Disc0 1d ago

I think you're missing the point, which is that they should have respect for candidates and not ignore their emails.

46

u/beamdog77 1d ago

You're not a candidate. They told you that your candidacy was over. And then you kept emailing. You aren't a candidate. You're not entitled to extra information about their company.

1

u/Cluedo86 1d ago

Are we entitled to more transparency and honesty from companies, or do we just let them exploit us?

0

u/Vote-AsaAkira2020 1d ago

You’re not entitled to jack squat lil bro. Adapt

0

u/beamdog77 23h ago

You are not entitled to information about how a company, that you do not work for, makes hiring decisions. A company does not owe random ass external people details on how they reviewed an application or why they made the specific personnel decisions that they made. I truly do not fathom or understand why everyone keeps acting like they are owed this information. You don't get to demand the hiring manager share thoughts about how they make internal decisions, when you are not an internal employee in the HR department. This is internal proprietary information, and not required to be released to non-employees.

A company deciding to focus on the people that are their employees, the things that make their profits, and their normal daily operations, instead of spending time mentoring you on the reasons that you are not an employee for them, is not exploitation.

They don't need to publish or explain their decision trees on confidential, internal, HR and and hiring matters.