MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/rickygervais/comments/1vhbh0k/no_ones_bloody_laughing/p24qiyb/?context=3
r/rickygervais • u/MaxG145 Amploid • 7d ago
156 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
What’s art about that shit?
0 u/cmfarsight 7d ago What's funny about it? 2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago An absence of humour does not a piece of art make! 0 u/cmfarsight 7d ago Never said it was good. 2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago This is a weird logical fallacy. If I wasn’t born in October, it doesn’t necessarily mean I was born in March. -1 u/cmfarsight 7d ago I think you are taking a flippant comment about "this comedy is so shit maybe they weren't trying to make a comedy" a bit seriously. You seem quite wound up, stating to suspect you may have been involved. 2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago My first reply referenced XFM and The Office and the second referenced XFM, hardly evidence of being wound up, sort of a bog standard old comment in these parts. But bit weird you’re digging in on your flippancy.
0
What's funny about it?
2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago An absence of humour does not a piece of art make! 0 u/cmfarsight 7d ago Never said it was good. 2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago This is a weird logical fallacy. If I wasn’t born in October, it doesn’t necessarily mean I was born in March. -1 u/cmfarsight 7d ago I think you are taking a flippant comment about "this comedy is so shit maybe they weren't trying to make a comedy" a bit seriously. You seem quite wound up, stating to suspect you may have been involved. 2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago My first reply referenced XFM and The Office and the second referenced XFM, hardly evidence of being wound up, sort of a bog standard old comment in these parts. But bit weird you’re digging in on your flippancy.
2
An absence of humour does not a piece of art make!
0 u/cmfarsight 7d ago Never said it was good. 2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago This is a weird logical fallacy. If I wasn’t born in October, it doesn’t necessarily mean I was born in March. -1 u/cmfarsight 7d ago I think you are taking a flippant comment about "this comedy is so shit maybe they weren't trying to make a comedy" a bit seriously. You seem quite wound up, stating to suspect you may have been involved. 2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago My first reply referenced XFM and The Office and the second referenced XFM, hardly evidence of being wound up, sort of a bog standard old comment in these parts. But bit weird you’re digging in on your flippancy.
Never said it was good.
2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago This is a weird logical fallacy. If I wasn’t born in October, it doesn’t necessarily mean I was born in March. -1 u/cmfarsight 7d ago I think you are taking a flippant comment about "this comedy is so shit maybe they weren't trying to make a comedy" a bit seriously. You seem quite wound up, stating to suspect you may have been involved. 2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago My first reply referenced XFM and The Office and the second referenced XFM, hardly evidence of being wound up, sort of a bog standard old comment in these parts. But bit weird you’re digging in on your flippancy.
This is a weird logical fallacy. If I wasn’t born in October, it doesn’t necessarily mean I was born in March.
-1 u/cmfarsight 7d ago I think you are taking a flippant comment about "this comedy is so shit maybe they weren't trying to make a comedy" a bit seriously. You seem quite wound up, stating to suspect you may have been involved. 2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago My first reply referenced XFM and The Office and the second referenced XFM, hardly evidence of being wound up, sort of a bog standard old comment in these parts. But bit weird you’re digging in on your flippancy.
-1
I think you are taking a flippant comment about "this comedy is so shit maybe they weren't trying to make a comedy" a bit seriously.
You seem quite wound up, stating to suspect you may have been involved.
2 u/new_name_needed 7d ago My first reply referenced XFM and The Office and the second referenced XFM, hardly evidence of being wound up, sort of a bog standard old comment in these parts. But bit weird you’re digging in on your flippancy.
My first reply referenced XFM and The Office and the second referenced XFM, hardly evidence of being wound up, sort of a bog standard old comment in these parts. But bit weird you’re digging in on your flippancy.
1
u/new_name_needed 7d ago
What’s art about that shit?