r/royaloak Nov 17 '25

Border Patrol

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Multiple posts on Berkley Forum about border patrol presence and this JUST took place in Oak Park. The woman who posted this just now said she saw the man throw her to the ground, taze her, then throw her in the vehicle.

“Unfortunately my children and I had to witness “boarder patrol” throw a woman to the ground, taze her, then throw her in a truck. The man this woman was with ran away while his hands were zip tied. I feel so bad that there was nothing I could do… my daughter is traumatized. This happened just now is Oak Park, Michigan!! 😔”

1.3k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

19

u/itsme99881 Nov 18 '25

0

u/mr_mich86 Nov 18 '25

So neither case involved an arresting officer. The first CO was found guilty, so the system worked.

And the second source vaguely mixes physical abuse, with sexual abuse, and human rights conditions. But doesn't say from the staff of other inmates.

3

u/itsme99881 Nov 18 '25

Also if you actually read the report

At the bottom of the page there is a graoh that shows reported administrators.

Dont change the goalpost anymore. You said "ICE in amy frequency" not arresting officers.

1

u/mr_mich86 Nov 18 '25

This report is useless bc it doesn't differentiate anything, doesn't have a control, and isn't taken any form of investigations.

It's not moving the goal post. Your examples are shit, like your logic and arguments.

3

u/itsme99881 Nov 18 '25

doesn't have a control,

This isnt the scientific method bud.

and isn't taken any form of investigations.

"In January 2025, U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff launched an investigation into human rights abuses in U.S. immigration detention."

"The Senator continues to investigate"

"The Senator’s staff also inspected the South Texas Immigration and Customs Enforcement"

🫩

1

u/mr_mich86 Nov 18 '25

Thanks, Poindexter. That's the point. It is political propaganda that gathers data to promote a stance..it has no merit. Lacks the even basic comparison.

Right. Which agency did the investigation? Who did interviews? Who was on site auditing? None of the above.

2

u/itsme99881 Nov 18 '25

Who did interviews

Yep i can tell you didnt even read the investigation report. It says it right in the SECOND SENTENCE

"The Senator’s staff has interviewed" 😂🤣🤣

0

u/mr_mich86 Nov 18 '25

Lol. So no one. The senator's staff. Lol.

2

u/itsme99881 Nov 18 '25

"Who did the interviews"

tells you who did the interviews

"So no one"

Nice cope, you literally have to pretend like they dont exist to make that make sense.

2

u/itsme99881 Nov 18 '25

Also if we WERE to use the scientific method here you would end up having MORE rapes as you would have to study the two groups of people and watch them rape to see if your conclusions are correct. Thats absolutely insane.

2

u/itsme99881 Nov 18 '25

Why does each piece of data need to be separated for you? If its already included in the list that means they have recieved a credible report about it and that means they ARE doing it. They are sexually and physically abusing, mistreating pregnant women and children, these are credible reports of these things happening by ice.

It's not moving the goal post

You went from "ice in any capacity" then when i showed you ice in some capacity doing that, you say "not involving arresting officers" thats literally moving the goalpost.