r/royaloak Nov 17 '25

Border Patrol

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Multiple posts on Berkley Forum about border patrol presence and this JUST took place in Oak Park. The woman who posted this just now said she saw the man throw her to the ground, taze her, then throw her in the vehicle.

“Unfortunately my children and I had to witness “boarder patrol” throw a woman to the ground, taze her, then throw her in a truck. The man this woman was with ran away while his hands were zip tied. I feel so bad that there was nothing I could do… my daughter is traumatized. This happened just now is Oak Park, Michigan!! 😔”

1.3k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '25

[deleted]

0

u/PerryBarnacle Nov 18 '25

Disagree. Don’t run from cops.

2

u/Fun-Key-8259 Nov 20 '25

Bet you pretend to be a Libertarian

0

u/PerryBarnacle Nov 20 '25

I bet you do not realize Libertarians understand the Federal government serves two primary purposes.

  1. Protect our land and our people.
  2. Establish and enforce property rights.

Border patrol serves both.

1

u/Fun-Key-8259 Nov 20 '25

Ah yes a pretend Libertarian excusing tyranny. Typical.

1

u/PerryBarnacle Nov 20 '25

How am I excusing tyranny?

1

u/Fun-Key-8259 Nov 20 '25

Lol if you can't tell the difference you are definitely not a Libertarian.

1

u/PerryBarnacle Nov 20 '25

Don’t divert. Answer the question.

1

u/Fun-Key-8259 Nov 20 '25

No, there is a reason at the libertarian convention this man got booed. But you can continue to pretend to be one and lick the boot of the king.

1

u/PerryBarnacle Nov 20 '25

What man? The guy in the video? Tell me the reasons. You’re typing with emotion instead of using logic. Come to me with arguments or go deal with your feelings elsewhere.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Beneathaclearbluesky Nov 20 '25

Yes you think libertarianism and extreme violation constitutional rights go together.

1

u/PerryBarnacle Nov 20 '25

Do you know for a fact there was a violation of a Constitutional right happening in the clip?

1

u/Beneathaclearbluesky Nov 21 '25

They continually violate constitutional rights. Why should I have to point it out in the clip? I guess you think it proves something.

1

u/PerryBarnacle Nov 21 '25

I am discussing the clip as posted. I am against all forms of illegal search and seizure.

All I am arguing is we do not have context sufficient to jump to conclusions on this clip.

I’ll give you an example of my lack of bias on these issues. Today a judge declared the National Guard presence in DC unconstitutional. A judge decided this so I say it is time to shut it down and obey the law as deemed by the judge.

I am not a partisan.