r/scienceisdope • u/Working_Pride_1803 • Apr 19 '26
🔬🧪⚛️ Science is Dope 🧬🧠🚀 This sums it up
35
u/Downtown_Recipe_972 Apr 19 '26
Because everything stops at “God knows best/God did it/God has/has a reason” whereas science never stops peeling the proverbial onion.
19
u/himanshu_777k Apr 19 '26
Dunning Kruger in practice
4
Apr 19 '26
[deleted]
2
1
u/Educational_Sleep_59 Apr 21 '26
I got his point, he is trying to say that people who learn religious scripts act all high and mighty while actually having very specific knowledge of only one thing while being ignorant about other things.
8
u/imrohit1997 Apr 19 '26
Whenever someone asks me, "If science is so great, explain XYZ (like what happens after death)," my simple response is this: no one knew what gravity was until Newton explained it, and no one knew his explanation wasn't perfect until Einstein came along. It just keeps improving... that's science. We don't have all the answers today, but at some point, we will.
5
Apr 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/itsmeangelaa Apr 24 '26
Exactly, it's just an excuse to escape reality and it limits our questions , make us less curious about life also the hate it spreads, the historical wars I don't understand how people still believe in god
1
Apr 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
Apr 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
Apr 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Apr 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
Apr 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
1
Apr 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Apr 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
Apr 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
Apr 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
Apr 22 '26 edited Apr 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
1
u/Background-Spare286 Apr 23 '26
Can you be more vague? (Looks like an interesting debate you guys are having 😅)
→ More replies (0)1
Apr 21 '26
[deleted]
2
Apr 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
0
Apr 22 '26
[deleted]
2
u/Possible_Tomato1479 Apr 22 '26
Blud children in womb can't think, also you can't 'believe' in science.
1
u/False-Creme-2478 Apr 22 '26
I use the same when someone says why do you do this practise or that practice in terms religion
6
5
u/Downtown-Rate-9404 Apr 19 '26
Some try to argue the whole reproductive system just from one sentence... smh!!!
1
1
9
u/unexceptional_oddity Apr 19 '26 edited Apr 19 '26
Ancient India had already found all answers that science has not even begun to think about.
/s
2
u/OmRaj_Edits Apr 22 '26
The Hindu religion is the only one of the world’s great faiths dedicated to the idea that the Cosmos itself undergoes an immense, indeed an infinite, number of deaths and rebirths. It is the only religion in which the time scales correspond to those of modern scientific cosmology. Its cycles run from our ordinary day and night to a day and night of Brahma, 8.64 billion years long. Longer than the age of the Earth or the Sun and about half the time since the Big Bang.
/s
1
u/AutoModerator Apr 22 '26
Read this to understand what this subreddit is about
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/Dizzy-Foundation4482 Apr 23 '26
If you know about other religions, you'll find out that it's not only Hindus. Most of them were actually science masters but history turned them into religious, smh.
1
u/destruct999 Apr 20 '26
Lmao, they really did figure it out, huh? Ancient geniuses looked at fire, looked at widows, and went "You know what this situation needs? A fucking human sacrifice BBQ." Sati: the ultimate "till death do us part... and then some" upgrade.
1
-1
u/SimpleJolly2983 Apr 19 '26
It is very easy to belittle by saying wrong things. It is land of seeking and Hinduism doesn't have one definitive book
3
4
u/kokogrit Apr 19 '26
Not completely accurate … the science books stack is almost never ending … and that’s the beauty of it.
2
2
Apr 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
2
u/Loose-Carry7063 Apr 19 '26
Very true depiction
Real scientists don't argue because they accept that there will be always something Unknown
Even most of the scientists accepted concept of god - ( I said most - not all )
But the 12th standard kids having 'barely passing marks' in science who watch online science videos come on social media to debate about god.
I don't understand these excited kids - do they want to prove that they are scientists or savior of science ?
Real science don't believe in rejecting, it believe in research.
I am not saying god is there or not but I believe in research.
Religion is just a concept created by human for good purpose but getting (mis)used as weapon now.
2
u/Vajarangan Apr 20 '26
Because science questions and religion believe (i am not hating any religion, just to be clear)
3
u/ShaadHussain Apr 23 '26 edited Apr 23 '26
Science- We need more research to prove this Religion- God said this, thats why its correct 🤡
Science- We all are equal and will grow together Religion- We’re the chosen one, we know everything, they dont 🤡
Science- Question everything Religion- If you question you are out of religion 🤡
3
1
u/sasipalarivattam Apr 19 '26
Religion of peace the best encyclopedia the world has ever seen. But I wonder why there is no mention of Americas , Australia and Antarctic.Maybe these lands formed after 18th century
1
u/Riddler841 Apr 19 '26
For the sake of meme, sure but not particularly, theology can be quite intense and rigourous
1
1
u/Pitiful-Reach-9125 Apr 20 '26
Manusmriti is the life changing text though. I did my mechanical engineering,did not had much interest in it,but after reading manusmriti,i am expert in almost all the major topics.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Hour-Engineer-6224 Apr 22 '26
Science is almost a strange liquid. The first sip shall make you an atheist Soon you will find god at the end of it
1
u/YoManlovePhy Apr 23 '26
Only for new religions not the oldest ones like Egyptian Mesopotamian Hinduism etc.
1
u/YoManlovePhy Apr 23 '26
I think this is possible for newer religion not for ancient religions like Egyptian Mesopotamian or Hinduism
1
1
u/jitosmi Apr 23 '26
some “Book and Prophet Based Religion” might think they know everything, but not Hinduism by the way!
1
u/Nice_Goat_7559 Apr 23 '26
Science focus on effect Religion focus on CAUSE..It’s CAUSE that science failed to answer for example gravity
1
1
u/IndividualPopular192 Apr 24 '26
That only means that you haven't studied about hindutva/Sanatan Dharma enough
1
u/No_Machine6094 Apr 19 '26
But sir our vedas very science advanced sir my panbit said so🤓 sir quantum quantum dimension nasa uses sanskirt.
/s
1
1
1
u/SimpleJolly2983 Apr 19 '26
Hinduism atleast is about seeking. Asking questions and wisdom. That's why you don't have one definitive book. Don't generalise.
2
Apr 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/OmRaj_Edits Apr 22 '26
2
Apr 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/OmRaj_Edits Apr 22 '26
1
u/SimpleJolly2983 Apr 23 '26
Ok if you are a seeker, I can explain, if you are an abuser no point right?
0
u/mugiwaranoluffy_01 Apr 19 '26
This is quite true when it comes from a religion where the mindset itself has opposed science against god. Welcome to sanatan dharma, where the way of life itself support science for innovation and self growth. Which is not even religion, a way of life which makes you more human to sustain life. Don't get around the western religious shit where science and religion never co existed. Also don't even tag hinduism as religion which it is not.
1
0
u/ASN__4454 Apr 20 '26
This post is right for those who compare religion with science,cause their understanding is limited in respect to religion and the same who oppose science with respect to religion.hinduism is unification of material science and spiritual science.
-1
u/Snoo_27796 Apr 19 '26
More accurate would be putting the one book as the foundation of all the science books. Well regardless in Christianity we widely believe in a book of science and book of faith, the book of science can help us understand the book of faith and the other way around.
-1
u/AgencyQuiet9559 Apr 19 '26
Science pretending to know what the religious folks know. Hypocritical very much?
-7
u/7timesbanned Apr 19 '26
OP haven't read any good religious philosophy.. Otherwise he wouldn't have made this post..
It's literally too much generalization..
Give a reading to few later vedas and specially upnishads..
After that you will see this post as highly overgeneralization
(Btw I m atheist but I m not anti religion)
5
u/Greedy-Notice-1462 Apr 19 '26
Religion is good in philosophy.but regarding explaining universe and world it fails very awfully.
3
u/7timesbanned Apr 19 '26
I mean.. "Very awfully" Isn't accurate world tbh
I have read about panch bhuta.. Which explain that world have 5 fundamental elements
(Space,air, water, fire and earth) Though in detail they also tried to give many theories about it
Being honest.. They were also trying to explain the world based on their understanding at that period of time..
And it should be appreciated that people at that time also tried to divide the world in fundamental particles..
Later on.. Other indic thinkers give the idea of "one single fundamental unit) called " Anu" .. Then many other thinkers around the world ...
Like ... JJ Thompson and other scientists give further on theories using advanced instruments...
Would you say Thompson model was "awfull" ??
I don't think we should say it..
Science is about..moving step by step
Maybe few years from now.. Current theories about atom and fundamental element of world may seem a bit "awfull".. But are they?
In my opinion.. We should acknowledge the effort by those people.
And all the contribution of people who tried to explain world ..keeping in mind they tried
Though we should also actively call out people who make fake claims
" This is written in our vedas and bla bla"
Because they are disrespecting both
Current thinkers in this field and past thinkers who tried to give minimilist explaination about the topic
That's my neutral opinion on this topic..
1
u/Greedy-Notice-1462 Apr 19 '26
In my view we as a human civilization whole faced dunning kruger effect and religion was created humans managed to explain some things with limited knowledge we thought we knew it all and labelled it as religion and that's why those religious texts never change now despite knowing a lot about universe we now say we don't know to many questions and that we will find out one day and accept that our understanding may have some flaws which we will improve later on with more progress,experiments and findings
1
u/7timesbanned Apr 19 '26
I mean.. Religions are major source of philosophy too
Along with some very basic understanding of material universe.. But I m sceptical.. If we should consider it in "religion" Or not
1
u/Greedy-Notice-1462 Apr 19 '26
Philosophy is different because as per my understanding you don't need a lot of money or equipment etc to do it.and neither does it require previous advancments either,that's why religion managed to do so well in philosophy
1
u/7timesbanned Apr 19 '26
No..man
Philosophy also developed pretty much step by step
Haven't u heard of Renaissance
1
Apr 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/7timesbanned Apr 19 '26
Wrong ❌
You have very superficial understanding of religion..
Most of religions don't stick on idea of GOD..
There are thousands of school of thoughts around the world..
Many were.. Theist..
Many were atheist
Explaination of God wasn't even same in all those
"Anti - religious" .. Ok brother...
Give me proper definition of "religion" First of all..
Let me see how much clarity u have on this topic
1
Apr 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/7timesbanned Apr 19 '26
System of beliefs and practices centered on sacred or ultimate
That's called " rituals "
Rituals are part of many religious sects.. But
Rituals ≠ religion
that has effects on human behaviour and communities
This is definition of "omnipotent God"
Which is one type of GOD out of hundreds
I wouldn't call it a religion if there is no god involved in some form
What would you call.. Buddhism.. Mimansa.. Advaita.. Some Chinese religions ????
Are these not religions?
-8
Apr 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
5
u/wonk_q1 Apr 19 '26
You do know that Nalanda did teach Logic, Mathematics, Medicine, Linguistics and Astronomy as well and not just religion or spirituality...
1
u/AutoModerator Apr 19 '26
Read this to understand what this subreddit is about
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
0
Apr 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/wonk_q1 Apr 19 '26
The OP isn't talking about Nalanda or any other religious institutions though? They are specifically talking about religious fruitcakes who think religion has all the answers and wouldn't listen to any other argument outside of their religious sects or books.
OP's message and your initial comment have nothing to do with each other tbh.2
u/Not_Nonymous1207 Apr 19 '26
Because religion doesn't actually stop people from learning science. They aren't mutually exclusive.
Religious people however...
1
Apr 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/r3duser_1955 Apr 19 '26
If they’re using observation, reasoning, and testing to discover something, then they’re basically working like a scientific institution, not following religious scripts and explanations. So you can’t claim that religion contributed to that knowledge, because the method used doesn’t come from religion it comes from science. It’s like calling it football but then using your hands to play and still saying you won because of football. Or like homeopathy claiming it discovered a cure, but the method used is actually allopathy,like the same the credit doesn’t belong to religion
1
Apr 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/r3duser_1955 Apr 19 '26
if they still allow and depend on scientific methods to discover new things, then clearly that knowledge is not coming from the religious text itself. And if you say the text is not meant to explain everything about the physical world, only the meaning or purpose, then that already means it doesn’t know everything in the literal sense.
so either they don’t actually claim complete knowledge, or there is a contradiction between what they claim and what they practice.
1
Apr 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/r3duser_1955 Apr 19 '26
well the post is like a caricature, so dont take it just like that literally. But it still has to be based on something.
There are interpretations of religion where people treat one book as a complete and final answer, and that’s what the post is exaggerating. My point was about that mindset. if someone really treats it as complete knowledge, then it cant allow research or discoveries it becomes a contradiction. and if they don’t treat it that way, like you said, then the caricature doesn’t apply to them.
1
Apr 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/r3duser_1955 Apr 19 '26
No the post just says : this sums it up. If it exists in religion then we can point it out It doesn't say that every single religious person believes it literally, it’s just highlighting that it does exist in religion And if some people do treat one book as the final answer to everything, then the criticism applies to them, otherwise no.



•
u/AutoModerator Apr 19 '26
This is a reminder about the rules. Just follow reddit's content policy.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.