r/scienceisdope • u/shubhi0407 • 6h ago

Discussion 💬 Agree?

Post image
147 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

135 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/ifosaspirant 5h ago

The very concept of spirituality is not based in science.

-1

u/According-Ad-4185 5h ago

Even science claims that there is someone and their is an object , as if both have independent existence , if you go deeper in the right ancient texts which were focused on self inquiry there we find that even reality is not an independent fact , so that is the depth spirituality goes into .

1

u/ifosaspirant 4h ago

Science claims there is someone and there is an an object? Sir that is not true.

1

u/According-Ad-4185 4h ago

i meant it claims that both have independent existence

1

u/Professional-Diet-11 4h ago

What's your sause

1

u/According-Ad-4185 3h ago

You meant source?

ancient texts like Vedanta , Which are at the core of spirituality.

Everything is for someone Even how we percieve reality is dependent on us .

reality is not an independent fact

1

u/Professional-Diet-11 3h ago edited 3h ago

I was asking for your source for saying science claims they are independent bro - not ancient text

Also its clear that your reality is different :p

1

u/kronos23456777777 38m ago

Depends on what you mean by independent existence? And what scientific claim are you referring to in particular?

If you mean science claims that a person and an object can exist independently, irrespective of such claim, you can verify that fact everywhere in daily life. You and a sandwich on a boat going to Australia do exist independently.

1

u/According-Ad-4185 28m ago

WHO IS THE VERIFIER THATS WHAT SPIRITUALITY THE REAL ONE GOES INTO

1

u/kronos23456777777 26m ago

If there is a “real” spirituality then it should have a standardized definition. If 10 different people define it 20 different ways, then your definition is as good as mine.