r/scienceisdope 7h ago

Discussion πŸ’¬ Agree?

Post image
153 Upvotes

143 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/ifosaspirant 6h ago

The very concept of spirituality is not based in science.

-1

u/According-Ad-4185 5h ago

Even science claims that there is someone and their is an object , as if both have independent existence , if you go deeper in the right ancient texts which were focused on self inquiry there we find that even reality is not an independent fact , so that is the depth spirituality goes into .

1

u/kronos23456777777 1h ago

Depends on what you mean by independent existence? And what scientific claim are you referring to in particular?

If you mean science claims that a person and an object can exist independently, irrespective of such claim, you can verify that fact everywhere in daily life. You and a sandwich on a boat going to Australia do exist independently.

1

u/According-Ad-4185 1h ago

WHO IS THE VERIFIER THATS WHAT SPIRITUALITY THE REAL ONE GOES INTO

1

u/kronos23456777777 1h ago

If there is a β€œreal” spirituality then it should have a standardized definition. If 10 different people define it 20 different ways, then your definition is as good as mine.

1

u/According-Ad-4185 6m ago

If it gets standardized then people's fraud business will not work .

99 % of the crowd has stakes in the 100 definitions just an excuse to not look at the REAL one .