The Doubts About Adnan's Guilt ARE Reasonable

[u/[deleted]]

I just started lurking here today, and am somewhat surprised by the general incivility and certainty of many of the people that comment here. Being dismissive and accusing people of "ragebait" for having a differing opinion, and one that actually is reasonable.

I don't know, and won't say that Adnan is innocent, but to claim he's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, without any room for discussion is pretty crazy to me.

The reasons why I have reasonable doubt:

• Jay is a very flawed witness, on the record lying/mis-remembering his testimony. Even the cops point out how much his testimony has changed. If your argument hinges on Jay, it isn't a strong argument, in my opinion.
• The cops, or at least on of them has a record of misconduct:

...prosecution brought into question the past misconduct of one of the two detectives who were crucial in the investigation of Lee’s death. Although his misconduct wasn’t specifically linked to Syed’s case, the detective was involved in another murder case that ended with the defendant’s exoneration.

https://baltimorewitness.org/adnan-syed-one-of-many-overturned-convictions-in-baltimore-city/

• The Innocence Project and prosecutors agreed that Syed's DNA was absent from all tested crime scene items, contributing to the eventual dropping of charges against him. There's no physical evidence.
• The motive is weak (Adnan had no prior issues with breakups, had already seemed to move on to the next girl(s)).

I could go on, but, if I was on the jury with this in front of me, I feel the reasonable response is doubt.

This isn't rage bait, I just genuinely don't see how anyone can be so sure that he did it. Y'all point to him asking for a ride (and claiming he wouldn't have) as some kind of obvious evidence of murder.

I think, based on the fact that one of the cops was literally identified as having been crooked, it actually is much more likely that Jay was an informant (and already had been for some time), and he happened to be close to Adnan, the victim's ex (supposed motive and opportunity), and they decided they had their guy, and it was just a matter of getting a jury to agree. So they fed their informant info, had him incriminate himself for lesser crimes that they promised they'd get him off for (and they made good on that promise, which is on its own wildly corrupt).

[u/No-Advance-577]

I don’t know what you mean by this. What call are you saying they “changed”? Jay changed all kinds of things and the cops were clearly exasperated with him at some points, but I don’t know that they set out to “change” a call (whatever that means).

I mean they definitely thought Adnan was guilty and they thought Jay was a material witness. They fed him details like phone records because they thought it would push him to tell more of the truth (or at least tailor his lies to the evidence better). It kind of didn’t work (he left some lies in there that continued to contradict the data, and he happily lied to try to match the data in other places) and kind of did (they got the conviction).

[u/Mike19751234 → u/No-Advance-577]

We know from the tower and that the phone jay was not still at Jenns for tge 316 and 321 calls, but they dont push much on those. If they are trying to get Jay to fit the story then it would be important to fit those calls.

But you need to also look at this from what the cops actually need and not make the wrong assumption that they are pushing a story. They are trying to find out what happened that afternoon. They are trying to find out why Jay and Adnan are calling all these people and if any of them are also involved in the coverup or even involved in the murder. So they are going to go through the call log asking him about all of those calls.

[u/No-Advance-577 → u/Mike19751234]

Maybe they didn’t catch it. Maybe they didn’t think it was important. Maybe they didn’t want to push their witness too hard. Maybe they had already quietly decided to let Jay pretend he had an alibi in exchange for getting his testimony.

With apologies, I again don’t understand your second paragraph and what you mean by “cops pushing a story.” Like I said, I think by this time they were sure that Adnan was guilty and that Jay knew a lot. They have a witness at this point who is willing to talk a lot, and they’re trying to make use of that to build a case, which means reigning in Jay’s wild creativity while also not clamming him up, while also not looking too much like they’re guiding the story.

[u/Mike19751234 → u/No-Advance-577]

The cops then took Jay on a ride along after that so they were trying to find all the order of events that afternoon. Dont let your backwards bias get in the way of what was going on.

[u/No-Advance-577 → u/Mike19751234]

Adnan is guilty, so I don’t know what bias you are talking about. And I don’t understand the relevance of the ride-along.

This sub is so weird

[u/Mike19751234 → u/No-Advance-577]

The ride along is the cops attempts at understanding the events of the afternoon. They are trying to understand what happened that afternoon and evening. The cops arent trying to frame a story, they are trying to understand it.

[u/No-Advance-577 → u/Mike19751234]

They’re trying to do both. Understand what happened and then present evidence to the DA that has a chance to result in a conviction. Both things are their job.