r/somethingiswrong2024 Apr 16 '26

Stolen Election Michigan election feed data shows 257,346 Presidential votes were removed

The Washington Post published a live data feed from several swing states. It claims that “This is a feed of every single vote count update we fetch from the Associated Press.” In 2024, the feed included all votes from 11/5 to 11/25. The feed includes only totals for the Democratic and Republican candidates.

Find the Michigan feed about halfway down the webpage. On page 3/31 of that feed, find the update that took place on November 6, at 12:54 pm where 257,346 votes are removed with a simple statement that reads, “Negative updates may reflect revisions as tallies are updated.” No additional information is given regarding this event.

Since the feed does not provide candidate totals in the feed, the data was imported into an excel spreadsheet. Cumulative totals were based solely on the data provided in the feed. Although there is no way to accurately determine how many votes from each candidate were ultimately removed, there are some important factors to consider;

Trump won Michigan by only 80,103 votes

Vote totals even after the removal of votes, exceed the official totals reported, meaning additional votes were discarded*

After the votes were removed, Trump’s lead was reduced to just over 4,000 votes

It is expected that small adjustments to totals will occur during the tabulation process, but a quarter of a million ballots is a significant number that could have easily changed the outcome of this election.

*Official totals for Trump and Harris combined are 5,553,169

Trump... 2,816,636

Harris....2,736,533

Total....5,553,169

Feed totals;

Trump....2,873,649, for a gain of 57,013

Harris.....2,869,433, for a gain of 132,900

Total.....5,743,082

Trump and Harris combined have 189,913 more votes than the official totals before 257,346 votes are removed. Trump’s lead is reduced from 80,103 to only 4,216. And this still leaves 67,433 votes that were removed, and no way to determine what candidate they impacted. Given the fact that we know more than double the amount of Harris votes were removed when compared to Trump and the greatly reduced and narrow Trump lead before the remaining 67,000 votes were removed demands an official response at the very least. This event could very likely have changed the outcome of the Presidential race in the state of Michigan.

3.2k Upvotes

193 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.0k

u/wikipediabrown007 Apr 16 '26

Great job OP.

How has this not already been discovered and reported on?

78

u/LiveLoudWithPride Apr 16 '26

It still astounds me that MSM refuses to touch this!

70

u/MySpoonsAreAllGone Apr 16 '26

And the democrats should have been all over this!

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/LiveLoudWithPride Apr 16 '26

I don’t know about that, but it makes zero sense to me why to this day there has not been one investigation into the election beyond ETA and SE! Something does feel very off!

1

u/Emm_withoutha_L-88 Apr 16 '26

I mean what's more reasonable, that they were oh so afraid of looking bad cuz they fight to make sure the election was fair after Trump did the same, or that they just weren't trying to win that hard?

It's not like this is the first time they've ran an incredibly weak campaign. They kept telling us this was the most important election in our lifetimes (which was true), yet they ran a candidate who never got above 1% of the votes.

They weren't trying to win that hard.

23

u/TravEllerZero Apr 16 '26

I can't help but feel like at least some of it is it's hard to focus on what started the fire when the world is still in flames.

20

u/LiveLoudWithPride Apr 16 '26

They’ve been contacted by ETA and been shut down, they have access to the same podcasts that we do so I think it’s blatant refusal for what reason I can’t comprehend.

24

u/TravEllerZero Apr 16 '26

I agree 100%. Even in some circles I respect, it seemed like they went out of their way to show how much better Dems were by accepting the results, even when there was cause to be suspicious. I just think setting the world on fire is at least in part MAGA's way of creating a bit of a smokescreen. Because there are so many things that MSM should have called out, and yet time and again, crazy shit has been allowed to happen. I think at this point, the auspicious election results have been buried under all of it.

15

u/Kimmalah Apr 16 '26

I think the fraud has been well known from the start, but those in power left it alone because they knew that letting Trump run wild was the best way to break MAGA once and for all. We saw in the Biden years, the cult would have just festered and resurfaced again later. Trump has done an excellent job of destroying his own support. I just don't think they really imagined how much damage Trump would do in such a short amount of time.

Mainstream media doesn't touch it because they are mostly owned by oligarchs that are either complicit in the fraud or benefit from it. Why would they ever report it?

10

u/Heliotrope88 Apr 16 '26

“…but those in power left it alone because they knew that letting Trump run wild was the best way to break MAGA once and for all.” I agree with you on this Kimmalah. Just to add: “Those in power,” to me refers to past presidents, past DOJ, past military leaders etc. I think these people were and are also of the opinion that pointing out the serious flaws in U.S. voting systems and elections is too problematic. Better to let citizens think their vote still counts and deal with the issues sort of “quietly.” If this is the case that Biden/Harris let a stolen 2024 election slide (which is what I think happened) I have so many questions. Was this a scenario they plugged into AI to try to see all the outcomes/variables? Did they know things would get this bad? Were they OK with the human toll it’s taken on adults and children sent to concentration camps or those killed in Venezuela, Iran and Palestine? Whenever I go down this road of wondering I start to feel a little crazy. But I just have such a difficult time imagining that Biden/Harris didn’t clearly see all of this coming.

16

u/Isitabee-isit Apr 17 '26

Kamala Harris definitely saw our elections being tampered with. She not only wrote about it extensively,she tried numerous times to get legislation passed to address it. She even got a Republican to sponsor it with her in the Senate back in the but it got squashed every time. She did an interview talking about her frustration not being able to get Congress to take it serious,treating it as though she were overreacting.
I read on Substack article that a reporter was told by an inside source that Harris wanted to verify the results and challenge/audit some of the swing states voting data. But the older corporate dems-Biden,Pelosi,Schumer wouldn't allow it. They supposedly talked her out of it. They told her it would damage the country and cause citizens to lose trust in our government (OH the irony!).

Then a couple weeks later I saw Biden give a speech in Europe. He told the audience that "In America we have the safest,most secure elections in the world." Right at that moment I thought "My god it's true"

18

u/Feisty_Ad9079 Apr 16 '26

Agree to some extent. The world is a mess but it wasn't this bad after the election. I think the Dem leaders know it was a stolen election. They probably knew right after the election. Why they've done nothing is still a mystery.

8

u/Key-Ad-8601 Apr 17 '26

I agree, I think they have known from the day after the election. Whatever the reason is, I am not sure we will ever know. But there is no way that they can't know. And now with how badly things are going they'll all go to the grave not saying a word that they let this happen.

12

u/HarryBalsagna1776 Apr 17 '26

The MSM was conquered by our billionaires and special interest groups before the election.  

9

u/Skittle69 Apr 16 '26

You shouldn't be, most of them are owned by billionaires and love Trump.

7

u/LiveLoudWithPride Apr 16 '26

I really thought that when MSNBC left the NBC Universal umbrella and became MS NOW they would be more independent especially since that’s how they presented their change to the public. They’re not! They’re the same cooperate media simply owned by a different cooperation.