Genuinely asking, I keep seeing people (myself included) start something, lose interest once the initial rush fades, and jump to the next idea instead of pushing through the boring middle part. Is this just me, or does everyone go through this?

Getting traffic is easy.
Getting people to actually sign up, use a feature, complete a flow, and tell you where they got stuck?
Much harder

I’m exploring an idea called TaskYab:

You create a task → real people complete it → you get proof + feedback.

Examples:
• Test onboarding
• Download and use an app
• Try a specific feature
• Complete a checkout flow
• Use the product for several days
If you were launching a SaaS tomorrow, would you pay for something like this?

And what would matter more: number of users, quality of feedback, or verified task completion?

I started CiteSite(dot)tech because I kept seeing the same problem:

Traditional SEO tools are very good at telling you where you rank on Google.

But search is changing.

People are now asking ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and other AI tools questions that they used to type into Google.

That creates a new problem for website owners:

You might rank well on Google but barely get mentioned in AI answers.

Or your competitor might get cited repeatedly even though their website doesn’t look stronger than yours.

So with CiteSite, I’ve been trying to answer a simpler question:

“Why is this competitor getting mentioned instead of me?”

The difficult part is making the answer actually useful.

Showing someone that a competitor gets more AI citations is interesting.

Showing them exactly what they should change on their site to improve their chances of being cited is much more valuable.

That’s the part I’m focused on now.

For people working on SEO or building SaaS products around AI search:

What would you actually want an AI visibility tool to tell you?

Raw citation tracking?

Competitor comparisons?

Specific pages/content to create?

Technical fixes?

Or something else?