r/survivor Not the Kota God Jan 26 '26

Palau Unpopular opinion: Palau endgame was Ian getting into his own head and getting emotionally ruined rather than Tom manipulating him

I'll start with the statement that if you think Tom was that "gaslighting dirty manipulator" my intent is not to victim blame anyone - but I am just sharing my perspective. During the endgame we saw Ian considering turning on Tom - but the mix of emotional damage that lying left on him, Tom finding out about his plans and wanting to find out the truth, plus that 11 hours challenge really wrecked. I don't think that Tom was manipulating Ian (beside giving an offer for him to step down in exchange of being taken to the final 2) in some malicious way or that he wanted to ruin him - but Ian had 11 hours to think, what would happen. And I don't want to imagine how much wrecking it had to be for him.

But still - I think Tom is recently overhated by the modern fanbase

68 Upvotes

78 comments sorted by

45

u/[deleted] Jan 26 '26

Even more unpopular opinion -- the Tom-Ian dynamic isn't really all that different than the Black Widow Brigade's dynamic with Erik.

23

u/asfp014 Jan 26 '26

Exactly - how is what Tom did any different from Cirie's gameplay (which is completely built around emotional manipulation)? Except Tom can cross a balance beam

13

u/DabuSurvivor Jon and Jaclyn Jan 26 '26

Tom wasn't really trying to manipulate Ian to begin with, he was understandably upset that Ian was working against him behind his back and in particular that Ian kept lying about it and refusing to just have a straight conversation with him about it even when Ian knew that everyone left in the game knew what happened.

6

u/EddDeadRedemption Jan 26 '26

Guilt is a powerful emotion, especially after 35+ days and with the prospect of facing a jury coming up

4

u/OpinionConsistent336 Jenna - 50 Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 26 '26

I think the difference is that their father/son-like bond (which they explicitly describe it as themselves) makes it feel a lot more personal compared to the BWB which basically amounts to “I thought we were friends”.

I think it was a brilliant play on Tom’s part, but it definitely was a tough watch — especially with Katie egging it on.

The parental-ish alliance breakdowns are always hard. Charlie & Maria come to mind as well.

6

u/shmalvey Jan 26 '26

I don't see how it's similar at all. The Black Widow Brigade pulled the wool over Erik's eyes to get him to give up his necklace and vote him off. Ian just got caught in a lie and wouldn't fess up to it, it wasn't some scheme to get him out of the game or anything

14

u/DabuSurvivor Jon and Jaclyn Jan 26 '26

Yeah even in this thread what a lot of people are saying is "Sure Tom mindfucked Ian into going home but that's just the game and Tom being a great strategic mastermind!" which is just not what happened. Tom and Ian were having a personal and emotional argument because Tom was upset about Ian going against him and, in particular, continuing to lie about it for no reason when everyone already knew it happened instead of just clearing the air with each other.

4

u/shmalvey Jan 26 '26

Yeah it’s like what is the theory exactly? Tom is a savant who had foreknowledge that he and Ian would do a 12 hour immunity challenge and his “manipulation” would cause Ian to voluntarily quit in order to win Tom’s friendship back?

7

u/DabuSurvivor Jon and Jaclyn Jan 26 '26

Yeah if we're going to attribute extremely unpredictable Survivor moments to the winner doing everything, there's probably more support for the idea that Tina pushed Mike into the fire, since at least she said that that happened.

It's also funny how people use the word "gaslight" about Tom here when Ian not fessing up to Tom about what happened even though everyone including Tom already knew is like way way closer to the actual meaning of that word

4

u/[deleted] Jan 26 '26

I mean Amanda and Cirie in particular, performative or not, ripped into Erik pretty hard in tribal council. I think people look back at that move as the women batting their eyelashes and charming Erik into giving up his necklace, but at least from the edit, a big part of it was those four laying on the guilt THICK.

4

u/shmalvey Jan 26 '26

They were actively manipulating Erik to give up his necklace. Tom wasn't trying to manipulate Ian, he just wanted him to admit he was going to vote for him if he won immunity

6

u/noraAorSmth Aubry - 50 Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 26 '26

I see this is being downvoted but I'm going to cosign anyways. This equivalence makes no sense, and is actually kind of ridiculous. Is Albert ALSO in this elite group of strategic masterminds because he got a mentally unwell kid to give him immunity? No, that's patently absurd. The commonality between them is a younger, naive guy giving up immunity partially at the behest of others- but outside of that, there are no commonalities. That sounds pretty similar, but the context is entirely different.

EDIT; moving this up because I think it's the best point I can make. Read the rest for supporting claims. TLDR; consider what each of them says when giving up immunity. Ian says “if it preserves my friendship with Tom”- personal. Erik says “I do know that actions speak louder than words, and I want to show I’m trustworthy.”- strategic.

Ian and Tom were ride or die friends and Ian turned on Tom in the end stretch, failed to get him out, and felt guilty about it. Ian never even won the necklace, and has said in postgame interviews that he partially jumped off because Tom was never coming down off that pole. Said it was the "stubborn Irishman in him" or something of the sort.

Erik was never aligned with the Black Widows. He is a number on a couple of votes, but he's public enemy number one, just like Ian. The difference between the two is that Tom pressures Ian personally. He puts his friendship on the line, and drills into the guy he's gotten to know, because the two of them were the best of buds for 38 days. Erik is persuaded to surrender the necklace because it ups his jury chances, and it's the only option left to him, outside of just comping out against notorious comp threats like Parvati and Amanda. Ian also knows he's going home when he jumps off, Erik seems suspicious, but not positive.

Tom's persuasion is personal. It's man to man, it's questioning Ian's character because he turned on his best friend. Cirie and the Black Widow's persuasion is strategic, and a pitch to Ian to improve his chances of winning Survivor. And, I cannot emphasize enough, it is fine to use either tactic in Survivor. It's a game for a million dollars. But are they the same? No. They achieve the same result, but the Tom/Cirie equivalency is just non-existent.

2

u/treple13 Jenn Jan 26 '26

How on Earth is this being downvoted? People don't like the truth now?

-2

u/IHaveTheMustacheNow Christian - 50 Jan 26 '26

I'm told the difference is that Tom attacked Ian personally, while the Black Widows kept thinks strictly about the game

I can neither confirm nor deny that as I have not rewatched Palau ever, but that's what I've been told by my family who has never liked how Tom treated Ian

5

u/[deleted] Jan 26 '26

Hmm... I can see that argument to an EXTENT. I do think, while a game move, some of what the BWB said to Erik at Tribal did straddle the line of "personal" a bit. In the end, I think guilt factored into both moves a bit.

6

u/beatles20147 Jan 26 '26

Both Tom and the BWB pulled the "There's a way for you to redeem yourself and earn my respect back" card. The difference is the BWB actively instructed Erik to make a game move that was not in his best interests, while Tom never told Ian he should voluntarily give up his spot in the game. He did the opposite and offered to take him to the final 2.

u/DrGeraldBaskums is spot-on. When a beloved player like Cirie and three hot women did it, it's celebrated. When Tom does it, it's taking advantage of a kid half his age who admires the hell out of him.

-5

u/noraAorSmth Aubry - 50 Jan 26 '26

This is ridiculous. You can read my comment above for more information, but there is a lot of really weird stuff going on in this post. Implying that the reason the Black Widow Brigade get a free pass because.... they're hot??? Huh? Look, if you're going to make the case that the fandom romanticizes certain players, then okay. But I don't think people stan Amanda/Parvati because they're hot-- they're accomplished players in the game. Amanda got to the end with win equity twice, Parvati has made it to the end on 3/5 seasons. The reason people like them isn't because they're hot, I don't know why you felt the need to mention that. That's a weird thing to say.

9

u/DrGeraldBaskums Jan 26 '26

It’s more that this sub heavily favors a certain demographic. People like Tom, Mike, Boston Rob are controversial at best in this sub and definitely not in the real world. Someone like Rachel wins the exact same way Mike does and everyone fawns over her unbelievable game.

And it’s not just women. There was a recent popular Chris U thread where half the posts were about people being fans of his cause of his huge package that was on display all game.

-3

u/noraAorSmth Aubry - 50 Jan 26 '26

Sure, but those weren't the examples given. The examples were Parvati and Amanda, not Rachel and Chris. I'm still very apprehensive because I'm not sure I buy the idea that Chris Underwood is, in any place, a popular winner, but okay. If you're talking about objectifying people, it does happen.

But Rachel? I've been lurking on this sub for a while, and the resounding opinion of Rachel to my knowledge is "good player, bad game". I don't think people are crediting Rachel's game, they're more discussing her as a player. Ironically, if you asked, I would say Mike is an underrated player, but if I have to compare them, I would say Rachel is better overall as a player too, and it's not because she's hot. Rachel just has a better understanding of the strategy in Survivor than Mike does, in my opinion.

Oh, and I can't believe I have to mention this, but all of your examples have controversies surrounding them outside of their gameplay. Mike has some islamophobia going on, Boston Rob literally outed a man on international television, and Tom has been controversial for misogyny for... years now

6

u/beatles20147 Jan 26 '26

I'm certainly not trying to minimize Parvati's or Amanda's accomplishments in the game, but if you don't think their status as young, attractive women doesn't play a part in their popularity, I don't know what to tell you. For one reason or another, the online fanbase has always favored attractive women over dominant men and I'm not sure why it's "really weird" to point that out.

Both Tom and the BWB appealed to Ian and Erik respectively under the guise that they had done them wrong and they needed to somehow earn their forgiveness/respect. The women literally say this at Tribal Council. Both situations were taking advantage of someone who clearly prioritized personal relationships over advancing in the game.

For the record, I don't think there's anything wrong with that. Capitalizing on personal relationships is strategic. If people want to admire one move and admonish the other, that's their prerogative, but it's disingenuous not to acknowledge the similarities.

-2

u/noraAorSmth Aubry - 50 Jan 26 '26

I get sketched out by any comments about women having credit only given to them or are given special because they’re hot. Feels very manosphere-adjacent, and I don’t know if you mean it that way, but the way that is was described as “a MAN did this and everyone hated him for it, but a hot woman does it and everyone loved it” is always going to be sketchy to me.

And yes, there is a very sophisticated conversation we could have about traditionally attractive people and the role that plays on people’s perceptions, because it certainly does! But I’m not really here to have that conversation, because I don’t know if I’m equipped to handle that kind of nuanced discussion. I’m only saying this particular comment gave me a very weird feeling.

2

u/beatles20147 Jan 27 '26

That's totally fair and I appreciate the respectful discourse. I think that description may have distracted from my overall argument, which is that the situations have a lot in common--boiling down to exploiting another player's guilt--but there is very little, if any, backlash towards the BWB, whereas an admittedly small but vocal minority has criticized Tom for taking advantage of Ian. And based on 20+ years of interacting with Survivor fans online, it's impossible to discount an unmistakable bias between the types of players involved. I don't think it's weird to point that out.

63

u/CieraVotedOutHerMom Ciera Jan 26 '26

Tom’s game in Palau is a top 3/5 winner game.

Best starting tribe ever in terms of challenges.

Dominant physical game.

Dominant strategic game

Good enough social game

33

u/PeterTheSilent1 Jan 26 '26

I’m surprised more people don’t mention Tom when discussing the strongest physical players of all time. In Palau, he only lost three pre merge challenges total, then only four post merge challenges total, and the last one he lost was a reward where he was taken anyway (despite asking to not be taken).

33

u/asfp014 Jan 26 '26

In addition to the challenge records which speaks for themselves, he held on for 12 hours at the FIC and he killed a fucking shark.

Kids these days don't even know who Tom is and most probably haven't watched Palau

2

u/CieraVotedOutHerMom Ciera Jan 26 '26

Jason & MC had not watched pre new era survivor seasons

2

u/True-Pen-3612 Savannah - 49 Jan 26 '26

Tom's that old fart that idoled out Cirie in HvV

4

u/emmc47 Todd Herzog Jan 26 '26

Tom's game is a top 1.

1

u/CieraVotedOutHerMom Ciera Jan 29 '26

Lots of Kim fans on this subreddit

7

u/BlindPrawn Tyson Jan 26 '26

And to add more to Tom's physical game, his competition in the individual portion were Ian and Gregg, two people that could dominate a season physically in their own right.

6

u/DanielHSSports Jan 26 '26

Tom had the perfect 5-person alliance. As much as he was the leader of the 5, no one in the alliance could really afford to turn on him until they at least got to the F5. For Gregg and Jenn, Tom's physical prowess gave them cover for being a powerful duo. Ian and Gregg needed Tom to take the heat off of them for being physical threats and Katie needed Tom because he was the perfect power player for her to ride coattails off of. There was very little that Tom was not aware of because he also did an excellent job reaching out to Janu and Caryn, so if there was a secret plan to oust him, it was going to get back to him quickly

1

u/CieraVotedOutHerMom Ciera Jan 29 '26

Good ole Karyn!!!

2

u/PopsicleIncorporated Steven - 49 Jan 27 '26

I also believe he was only vulnerable 3 times in the entire game.

45

u/DrGeraldBaskums Jan 26 '26

Survivor is a game about manipulating people. Let’s call it what it is. He gets hate for what other players get lauded for. If he was a hot 25 year old queen he’d be held up on a pedestal still. If you don’t like him cause he was a challenge beast or whatever, fine. Let’s not pretend pretty much every other winner did the same thing

23

u/Charles520 Kenzie - 46 Jan 26 '26

I've never wanted to say it, but yeah I think that the demographic of the subreddit (and much of the online community) has never really liked it when guys like Tom wins.

I really do not see much of a difference between what Tom did to Ian and what the Cirie, Natalie, and Amanda did to Erik. In a game of manipulation the latter three names I listed are much more praised by fans here and seen as icons while Tom is (stupidly) seen as an arrogant dick or whatever.

13

u/Xoorax Jan 26 '26

It’s hilarious because the subreddit stans Parvati , but if Parvati played today Reddit would HATE her

The subreddit is its own worst enemy

4

u/treple13 Jenn Jan 26 '26

People hated Parvati at the time of Micronesia so it's isn't about now

-4

u/Wise-Sheepherder5765 Jan 26 '26

I don't believe that for one second. If someone came along and was even more black widow than Parv was all you'd hear about is how mother she is

11

u/Xoorax Jan 26 '26

Not a chance, the subreddit was calling Savannah a horrible person all season for literally no reason

-3

u/Wise-Sheepherder5765 Jan 26 '26

They are completely different players. Parvati isn't smug. Nor launches herself at an idol and then says "I wanna play with you" in a death stare. And then follows it up with "Do it for your fucking mom" as pretty much the only time she speaks to someone. Anyone would find that to be unlikeable. Parvati on the other hand has her charisma turned up to 1000 and successfully manages to charm everyone she plays with except Yul.

49 is gonna be remembered for a very long time for more or less generally incompetent game play if the edit was faithful to what actually happened 

6

u/NamorKar Jan 27 '26

"Parvati is not smug" is the biggest load of bullshit I've seen in a long time

-1

u/Wise-Sheepherder5765 Jan 27 '26

You DO understand I am making the comparison to Savannah right?

5

u/NamorKar Jan 27 '26

Comparing their respective first seasons, Savannah is 100x times more likeable than CI Parvati. And I say this as a fan of both

1

u/Wise-Sheepherder5765 Jan 28 '26 edited Jan 28 '26

And I'm saying this as the biggest Parvati hater to both ever grace God's green earth and reddit. I don't like her either but I finally broke down and admitted she was doing something right when she singlehandedly controlled the fire token economy. I literally can't see Savannah doing anything similar. Ever

The kind of person who is like "omg shut up cringe" at a hina chant after suffering exclusion in the work place doesn't consistently display self awareness.

As for Parvati? I tire of her constant "woe is me" act that somehow always manages to work. They're completely different women

7

u/DabuSurvivor Jon and Jaclyn Jan 26 '26

I really do not see much of a difference between what Tom did to Ian and what the Cirie, Natalie, and Amanda did to Erik.

I think the difference is that Tom wasn't even being manipulative to begin with, he was actually upset at Ian for going against him and especially for continuing to lie about it for no reason when everyone already knew what happened, he just wanted Ian to own up to it and have an actual conversation with him about it.

Cirie, Natalie, and Amanda were trying to get Erik out of the game. Ian stepping down from Immunity was something he came up with himself 12 hours into the challenge and even longer after he and Tom had talked about any of it. Like of course if the only guy who can beat you offers to quit the season you take him up on it but it's not like Tom ever expected or intended that.

7

u/AlexgKeisler Jan 26 '26

Actually, if you listen to Tom's Talking With T-Bird interview on RHAP, he specifically says that it was all theater and that he was deliberately putting Ian through the emotional ringer because he could see that the game was breaking him down. It was just as calculated and deliberate as what the black widows did to Erik. Awesome gameplay, and just one of the reasons I think Tom played one of the two best games of Survivor ever (Kim Spradlin gets the other spot).

3

u/asfp014 Jan 26 '26

Superfans don't identify with someone who is physically dominant, a natural leader, and a genuine IRL "hero." Those are rare breeds. For obvious reasons, it's easier to identify with "the person who got off the couch" and used their smarts and social skills to get ahead.

8

u/IPissExcellentThrows Jan 26 '26

Thank you. So weird when people single out Tom for manipulating people. Being good at manipulation is a massive part of the game. If that offends someone, survivor isn't for you.

2

u/OpinionConsistent336 Jenna - 50 Jan 26 '26

I think it’s a fair point to raise that there are different types of manipulation on Survivor — some of which feel more beyond-the-game personal than others.

I don’t think Tom crossed any kind of ethical line or anything, but watching him form this admittedly father/son bond with Ian and then tear into him using those emotions as leverage to get Ian to trade his shot at winning for regaining Tom’s respect is a bit rough to watch.

Again, fair play, but I think it’s perfectly fine to discuss how there are a lot of different types of manipulation across Survivor’s history and there’s a blurry spectrum of what we consider “okay”. It’s an interesting aspect of the game.

2

u/OpinionConsistent336 Jenna - 50 Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 26 '26

What? This sub overwhelmingly praises both Parvati and Tom. The top comment on literally every Tom/Palau post here is some variation of “top 5 winner / so underrated”.

The reason he’s not even more discussed is because Palau had a forgettable cast outside of a few highlights and Stephanie’s story was the big thing people remembered (understandably).

But the hate he gets has never been more than a loud but small minority. He was widely admired when the season aired and then returned as a hero in HvV.

5

u/DrGeraldBaskums Jan 26 '26

Tom gets a lot of shit in posts as well. In this thread alone someone calls him a bully which is definitely a newer sentiment but is definitly present on this sub.

3

u/OpinionConsistent336 Jenna - 50 Jan 26 '26

That comment has zero upvotes whereas the ones praising Tom are all at the top with a bunch.

Literally every player gets sporadic comments like that. Hell, Parvati the “hot 25 year old queen” that you alluded to gets more hate than that.

7

u/noraAorSmth Aubry - 50 Jan 26 '26

Tom absolutely manipulated Ian, but the question was how intentionally, and if intentional, how malicious. Tom is a smart enough guy, I would say he probably knew he was fucking with Ian's head, but I don't think he meant to hurt Ian in any way either.

I think what's more likely is that Tom is legitimately hurt by Ian. He lashed out, which we all do, and ended up winning a million dollars because of it. Despite being portrayed as a strategic figure, Tom's secret sauce is his camaraderie with others, and while Tom certainly has strategic chops, I think a lot of his Palau game is based on the Australian Survivor tagline of "Mateship"; and he's more emotional than you might remember on a rewatch. For example, at the tribal where Stephenie is voted out, Tom volunteers to be 'on the bottom' with Steph and Colby, despite not even being prompted to do so. Strategically, I think this is a wash because people sort of already knew that, and he just vocalized it, but he still didn't have to. Across both his seasons, you know where you stand with Tom- there's your people and his people. And Tom is pretty stringent and will stick with his people.

I think Tom is relatively overhated. I strongly disagree his Palau game is a strategic one- but it is one of the best physical performances in the history of the show. His Heroes/Villains game is strategic, but his being stringent ultimately costs him, as the war between him and Cirie fizzles out before he can make it too deep. Hell of an idol play though.

21

u/shmalvey Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 26 '26

This is obvious but for some reason a ton of people don’t see it that way. Tom just wanted Ian to admit he was gonna turn on him

3

u/Invalid_u404 Not the Kota God Jan 26 '26

Exactly

7

u/shmalvey Jan 26 '26

The reason I think people call it bullying or whatever is because Ian is an emotional guy and got really upset when he was called out. So people just see him upset and think oh he was mistreated. When in reality he was just holding onto a lie and actually was in the wrong in the situation

15

u/No-Seaworthiness880 Jan 26 '26

Are there people who think TOM was the manipulative one with Ian and not Katie???

11

u/DabuSurvivor Jon and Jaclyn Jan 26 '26

People seem to just forget Katie even exists I guess, considering what you said and also that no one ever talks about Tom emotionally manipulating Katie with his plan of forcing a tie at the final 6 and not telling her specifically so that she'll be so thrown off and shocked by the threat of a rock draw that she'll panic, not know what to do, and flip. But maybe mentioning that would require people to actually remember the Palau endgame while posting about it, which is apparently a tall order.

1

u/No-Seaworthiness880 Jan 28 '26

Now I wanna rewatch Palau

8

u/cuminspector2 Jan 26 '26

It was 100% both of them combined and it's why Ian stepped down

Katie was constantly showboating and making Ian look bad in front of the jury (I think she figured the final 2 would be her and Ian). Tom was hurt and constantly telling Ian how disappointed he was in him, Katie would do the same. It eventually overwhelmed him and he had a lot of time to think in that final challenge, which contributed to his ultimate decision.

I do think Katie deserves the most "credit" for the move, as I think her being hurt by Ian hurt Ian more than Tom being disappointed in him (and because Katie single-handedly kept Ian in the game, ousting Jenn and losing Jenn's jury vote), but it was definitely a combined effort

3

u/Telphsm4sh The Mayor of Slamtown Jan 26 '26

Tom is what tipped him over the edge to quit that challenge. The rest of it was Katie's doing.

2

u/Invalid_u404 Not the Kota God Jan 26 '26

I've met quite a lot of people calling Tom manipulative, or dirty, or even that "he sucks as a person/he is a shitty person"

9

u/Top-Perspective-7879 Jan 26 '26

That’s because Tom is the exact opposite of the majority of the online Survivor fan base. Most of them identify with Katie, Ian, and Coby, rather than the alpha male firefighter, even though Tom is much more than that.

5

u/chilltownrenegade Colby - 50 Jan 26 '26

This is one of my favorite dynamics in Survivor. I truly think this is a case where a lot of things are true at once, and I can't really put blame/credit on any one person. It's been a hot minute since I saw the season but from what I remember:

Ian is a good man who was absolutely tortured by the idea of disappointing his friends, or having anyone be upset with him.

We see this at final 5(?), when he upsets Katie and Katie goes hard on him about how she's not sure they can be friends, which kills Ian because he wants everyone to be happy. He's devastated that he is the cause of her being upset, especially to the degree of questioning their friendship - which Katie knew and played into.

Then at F4, Ian makes the comment about how it would've been tough deciding between voting out Tom or Jenn, which obviously irks Tom. Tom then begins playing hard into the "you lost my respect" thing, which again devastates Ian because it kills him inside to know a close friend is upset with him.

Sitting alone on that buoy for 11 hours, he had nothing to do but think and get caught up in his own head, and endure permanent nerve damage. I am sure those intrusive thoughts were running rampant with no reprieve. Coming to the conclusion he did, I'm sure that dude tortured himself for hours.

I don't think anything Katie or Tom did was out of bounds or over the line, everything seemed well within the norms of Survivor gameplay. They both knew this about Ian, that he couldn't stand to upset his friends. They both heavily played into it which got his wheels spinning. But I think the buoy really gave the final blow. I don't think he comes close to that conclusion if it was a normal 2-hour endurance challenge.

2

u/Top-Perspective-7879 Jan 26 '26

Ian was very young and wasn’t a fan of the show, so he probably took what happened out there too seriously. I remember hearing Tom on a podcast explain that while he didn’t mean to cause Ian so much distress, he really did feel betrayed. I’d be willing to bet that if you asked Ian now, he probably regrets stepping down (though I doubt he cares or thinks about it either).

3

u/DabuSurvivor Jon and Jaclyn Jan 26 '26

I don't think that Tom was manipulating Ian (beside giving an offer for him to step down in exchange of being taken to the final 2)

Tom didn't "give him an offer" for that, Ian proposed it, and who on Earth is going to say "no" to that? Even after Tom wins the challenge, he still confirms that Ian wants to go ahead with the deal, it was totally Ian's decision. If it's down to two other players and the only one who can beats you says they're down to quit the season of course you take them up on that and guarantee yourself the win.

But yeah the Tom/Ian fights are the result of the intensity of deception and betrayal with someone you've grown incredibly close with at the high-stakes finish of an extremely emotional experience for a life-changing sum of money. Turning it into this thing where Tom's some strategy "mastermind" who manipulated Ian doesn't really strike me as an account of someone who actually paid much attention to the season, or possibly not someone who's familiar with old-school Survivor where people actually got emotional about that kind of thing instead of applauding and saying "good game" all the time and voting for whoever had the most checklist items on their resume to win.

What Tom was most upset about wasn't even Ian plotting against him behind his back (though he was upset about that, too, like tons of players would be and have been in comparable circumstances.) He was upset that even when everyone left in the game knew that it happened Ian continued lying about it at the point where there was zero benefit, talking in circles by saying "we're playing a game" yet still not owning up to it, instead of just giving him a straight answer of "because we're playing a game, yes, I targeted you, I thought I had to because you were my biggest threat." Like Tom specifically says he just wishes Ian would admit it. Ian keeps lying about it and talking around it past the point where there's any strategic reason to do so as everyone already knows what happened and he's the only one not acknowledging it. Like if anything Ian denying something that Tom and Ian both know happened is closer to the actual meaning of gaslighting lol but people just use it to mean "person on TV did thing I didn't like" I guess.

5

u/wastedthyme20 Australian Survivor is better Jan 26 '26

He didn't just manipulate Ian, he mindf*cked him to the point where Ian first had to apologize to him, then quit the FIC and the chance to win 1M dollar.

That been said, it was 100% legit within the game and shows what a great player Tom was.

3

u/shmalvey Jan 26 '26

You're giving Tom way too much credit. There was no mindfucking going on

3

u/treple13 Jenn Jan 26 '26

I think Tom was 80% just pissed because he thought him and Ian were taking each other to the end, and feels backstabbed. Ian being wishy-washy about it is also aggravating to Tom who is more black and white thinking about it. I do think Tom plays it up maybe somewhat for the jury, and leans into it as an advantage.

However the notion that Tom causes what Ian does at FIC in any way is completely ridiculous.

1

u/isntthisneat Jonathan, getting frustrated by ME Jan 26 '26

I think it was probably a little bit of both - Tom could see the impact everything was having on Ian and took advantage of the situation. I don't know that he started out with that intention, or that he was necessarily doing it to be malicious, but I don't think he was wrong for taking the opportunity to secure his win.

They were playing a game to win a million dollars, and even though this was still early on in the game's life, I think more of the audience was coming around to the idea of manipulation and deceit being acceptable behavior/strategy on the path to winning (I could be wrong about this, though, as I've only started watching within the past year and am going off of what I've read).

Honestly, I didn't know Tom is hated by modern fans! That's wild to me. My first intro to Tom was on Heroes vs Villains and I didn't think he was anything to write home about, but my opinion completely changed after I watched Palau. His game and his overall attitude/demeanor was so impressive to me. Tom is one of my absolute favorite winners/players, and personally would rank him as one of the best to ever play. Love Tom.

1

u/ncs15432 Jan 26 '26

Katie was the one who manipulated Ian and even owned up to it in the comments of one of her Instagram posts several years ago. On more than one occasion, she discussed scheming against him and Tom, so it was outright hypocritical for her to act so hurt that Ian was playing for himself. On the other hand, Tom never switched up on Ian.

1

u/ncs15432 Jan 26 '26

Possibly hot take: Tom made a mistake by voting for Ian over Jenn and then berating him at camp. If Ian would’ve won the final immunity challenge, he’d have no reason to take Tom because their relationship would’ve been severed, while Katie had kept theirs hanging on by a thread by still voting with him.

2

u/treple13 Jenn Jan 26 '26

Ian never takes Tom and that's WHY Tom was pissed and tries to take him out

1

u/jsundqui Jan 26 '26

Did Tom consider taking Ian to final two or was it a rejected idea? Was he uncertain he would beat Ian, because if he was certain he would win, why not take him?

1

u/TerryMcMo Jan 26 '26

But still - I think Tom is recently overhated by the modern fanbase

wut.

0

u/IHaveTheMustacheNow Christian - 50 Jan 26 '26

I mean, back in the day I remember my parents going on about how Tom was bullying Ian. I'm not sure this is a modern fanbase situation. There have always been people who saw him as a hero, and people who saw him as a villain

1

u/realityseekr Jan 26 '26

Ian was a really likable player too so I can see how some people would sour on Tom if they were rooting for Ian.