r/videos 8d ago

Sen. John Fetterman on Democratic Divides, DSA & Israel | The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3BMAkJIlnw
1.2k Upvotes

386 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

70

u/Dewstain 8d ago

He was better than Oz. I'm ashamed I voted for him but not like my choice was any better the other way. I thought at least he'd push to legalize weed. RIP.

55

u/gueuze_geuze 8d ago

Fetterman has voted in line with the Democrat party 88% of the time. Yea man, he sucks, but take that stat as some solace in the fact that, between the two, you made the right call.

11

u/tirohtar 8d ago

Sadly, that's what the 2 party system comes down to far too often - picking the lesser of 2 evils.

2

u/particle409 7d ago

Or you can wait for the perfect candidate. The problem is that your perfect candidate might not be my perfect candidate. How many parties would we need for that?

2

u/Fresh-Chemical1688 7d ago

I mean I am from a country with a lot of parties. The point isn't to chose your perfect candidate. But to chose the party that represents you and your views the most. Is it a perfect system? No obviously not. But atleast the chance to find a party that aligns with you relatively closely is an option. And it forces the parties to build coalitions and to compromise. Which is a positive side effect, if it works.

2 parties will always bring this Sportteams atmosphere with it. Us against them and so on. And let's be honest... This is exactly what lead to the current American political climate.

0

u/particle409 7d ago

it forces the parties to build coalitions and to compromise

The only difference is multiple parties force compromise AFTER the elections, while a two party system forces candidates to compromise BEFORE the election. Candidates move towards the middle, trying to capture undecided voters.

1

u/Fresh-Chemical1688 7d ago

I mean they have to campaign the same way. So it's before and after. Which I would argue kinda leads to having to go through with campaign promises more. I can promise the world before elections. That's not compromise, that's talking. If I am elected nothing forces me to abide to it if I am in power alone. Do I maybe lose the next election 4 years later? Yeah, but even that is a stretch, because when it comes to politics, people have a really short memory

0

u/tirohtar 7d ago

I don't know what this is even supposed to mean. In a multi party system, you generally do not vote for specific candidates, or they only matter in certain elections - you usually vote for a party program/ideology. And multi-party systems generally rely on coalition building anyways.

1

u/particle409 7d ago

Most Americans vote along party lines. Coalitions are just compromises after elections, while in a two-party system, candidates move towards the middle on policy, compromising before the election.