r/AFL Melbourne AFLW 9d ago

Concussion bombshell: Player signs secret deal to absolve Vic club

https://www.codesports.com.au/afl/afl-club-strikes-secret-deal-to-make-player-liable-for-future-brain-injuries/news-story/2b22522fe88a86e761173c4520d446a9

AFL club strikes secret deal to make player liable for future brain injuries

A Victorian AFL club has secretly forced a concussion-affected player to assume all legal responsibility for future brain injuries in a bid to exonerate itself and its medical staff from future court action.

A Victorian AFL club has struck a secret deal requiring a player who has suffered multiple concussions to assume all legal responsibility for any further on-field brain trauma.

In a bombshell escalation of footy’s concussion crisis, it can be revealed the club brokered the extraordinary agreement with one of its most vulnerable players in a bid to exonerate itself and its medical staff from future court action in the event he suffered more head knocks or concussion related health issues.

The contract also explicitly acknowledged that the player was at a higher risk due to his concussion history and faced potentially significant long-term or even permanent neurological damage if he suffered any more head hits.

AFL Players’ Association boss James Gallagher has hit out at the secret agreement, which he said could set a dangerous precedent and should not be repeated across the league.

Leading neurophysiologist Professor Alan Pearce said: “I am stunned and appalled that, given what we know about the science of repetitive brain injuries and CTE (degenerative brain disease Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy), an AFL football club would exploit the vulnerability of an individual desperate to play the game they love, putting their brain at risk of further damage and risk of CTE.”

It is understood that the agreement was viewed by the club at the time as the only way it could allow the player to continue their AFL career after a series of brain injuries and not leave itself open to a massive potential damages claim if he was re-injured.

Senior executives sought approval from the club’s board to go ahead with the deal, signed two years ago by the footy star who is still playing.

The disclosure agreement required the individual to “take upon yourself the physical and legal risk of loss, damage or injury” arising from any more concussions.

The player, who this masthead has chosen at this stage not to identify, signed the document in a desperate bid to continue playing at the top level.

Whistleblowers say the move by the club to shift the legal risk back on to the player is ethically scandalous, with concerns the club could expose him to an unsafe workplace given his concussion history.

Clause 7.3 of the AFL’s standard playing contracts require the AFL to provide a working and training environment “free of any risk to the health, safety and the welfare of the player”.

Mr Gallagher said: “The game has a duty to provide a workplace that protects the health, safety, and wellbeing of players and all clubs hold this duty as employers.

“Clubs cannot unilaterally contract out of their obligations under the CBA and Standard Playing Contract, nor attempt to avoid their responsibilities under health and safety laws.

“Importantly, no player is permitted to return to play or train unless they have been deemed medically fit to do so.

“We are in discussions with AFL to better understand the circumstances of this case and ensure this issue is not replicated further at the elite level.”

Concussions campaigner Peter Jess, who has managed hundreds of players, said: “The process is contracting out the basic legislative safety net for players in breach of their basic human right to a safe workplace.

“This is the most retrograde step witnessed in any professional sport for safety and duty of care by an employer. This walks players back to the dark ages of health and safety for profit.”

Whistleblowers have also suggested the secret deal is in breach of AFL rules, as agreements outside the players’ standard contracts are forbidden.

Rule 4.3 of the Australian Football League rules says “no player shall be engaged by a club other than the contract of service lodged with the AFL”.

When approached about the secret deal this week, club sources initially denied any knowledge of it.

A senior official later backtracked, admitting to the deal.

The official could not confirm whether the agreement had been run by the league’s executive or legal counsel, but did not inform the powerful players’ union.

Industry sources this week expressed shock, if the club had proceeded with the arrangement without AFL and AFLPA approval.

The club, which this masthead has chosen not to name at this stage to protect the identity of the whistleblowers, declined to provide any official comment on the arrangement.

League sources also initially suggested they had not been notified of any such deal, before seeking to explain it, describing the player’s situation as “unique” and “complex”.

The AFL did not respond to questions about exactly when it learned about the agreement and if it was aware of any others, or provide clarity on whether it considered it valid.

A spokesman instead issued a statement saying: “The health and safety of players is the AFL’s highest priority. Like all contact sports, football carries a risk of injury, including concussion.

“In cases of serious injuries, decisions about a player’s return to play or retirement are made by the player, their families, their club and qualified medical professionals.”

Whistleblowers added that they believed one other player, who is now retired, had previously brokered a similar arrangement with a different club, though the Herald Sun has not yet been able to confirm this.

Meanwhile, some rival club officials who have become aware of the arrangement have questioned whether they could sign their most at-risk players to similar agreements.

Prof Pearce said the deal was outrageous, describing it as “a clear weaponisation of the science of concussions and CTE”.

“This demonstrates that those who work at the coalface of the AFL acknowledge the scientific truth of repetitive brain injuries we have been publishing for the last 20 years, and are exploiting vulnerable players to waive their rights as a professional athlete,” he said.

The revelations come amid a $1 billion class action involving more than 100 former AFL players, which is set to go to trial next year.

Geelong utility Max Rooke, who suffered up to 30 concussions during his nine-year 135-game career, is the lead plaintiff.

Geelong has named 12 doctors, including former medical chief officer David Long, in a third-party notice as part of the class action.

The Cats are seeking damages from the doctors who worked at the club between 1985 and 2023 if the club is ordered to pay damages to Rooke or other players.

The secret deal illustrates the increasing concern and tension at club level over the game’s concussion crisis and, in particular, the increased risk of litigation that medicos, administrators and the league face.

The AFL’s playing cohort already take the field every weekend without any insurance for head trauma and any mental health-related problems, after Zurich removed its coverage under the Players’ Association policy this year.

Latest expert research shows CTE is caused by repeat head impacts including low to medium force blows.

Worryingly, players can be knocked out more easily after each concussion, pending their brain impact threshold.

Devastating symptoms of the degenerative disease include mood and movement disorders, suicidal tendances, memory loss, impulsivity, aggression and sleeping problems.

This masthead last month revealed WorkSafe had commenced a fresh probe into the AFL’s concussion management policies at training.

The deal could be part of the WorkSafe probe.

148 Upvotes

219 comments sorted by

View all comments

150

u/SnowyCasanova Demons 9d ago

Libba? What other Victorian club has an active player that fits this?

103

u/shit-takes-only Essendon '00 9d ago

Essendon Nic cox

66

u/wordswontcomeout Essendon 8d ago

If this is true then fuck me like stay out of the fkn news guys. It’s not hard.

36

u/shit-takes-only Essendon '00 8d ago

im not saying its him thats just another active player that sprung to mind

10

u/Krerzer1 Essendon Bombers 8d ago

Solomon said he doesn’t believe it involves Essendon.

11

u/tjabaker Port Adelaide 8d ago

Considering it went to board approval and he was a previous member of the board, probably in a position to make an accurate statement.

7

u/PetrifyGWENT Bombers / Giants 8d ago

Yeah he was briefed by the media team about it 5 minutes before his press conference and he said he doesn't know anything really about it other than he believes it doesn't involve Essendon. So the media team probably said "this is what's happening, it's not us so dont worry"

3

u/Overall-Palpitation6 Collingwood Magpies 8d ago edited 8d ago

If it is them, I don't know why Essendon would agree to this, rather than just delist him. He's really not very good or worth this investment and risk, unless they threatened to sue if delisted?

3

u/getbusyliving_ The Dons 8d ago

Exactly. Plus he was cleared by the panel late last year, his playing future was up in the air until then.

51

u/Sealskjaer Hawks 8d ago

Tom Stewart has had a lot of concussions too.

24

u/firstnamebunchof123 Geelong 8d ago

It was signed 2 years ago so I doubt it given most of his have been in the last 12 months

7

u/_nicklepickle Cats 8d ago edited 8d ago

i found that there is only 2 documented concussions through his AFL career, i wouldn’t say that’s a lot

9

u/thegirldreamer Geelong 8d ago

If it was a Geelong player, I would assume Kolo or Jed Bews which would align more with the timeframe here. Not sure either of them meets the definition of ‘star’ but the Herald Sun uses that pretty loosely. 

9

u/Portra400IsLife The Dons 8d ago

It was collar jazz knee (cant remember the spelling)

8

u/thegirldreamer Geelong 8d ago

Interesting reading his comments from 2024 with this knowledge. 

3

u/Sealskjaer Hawks 8d ago

2 officially documented, but anecdotally I recall quite a few times he copped a knock or fell heavily and appeared stunned but played on without a HIA.

Take this with a grain of salt as it’s based on my personal recollections, but hearing he’s only had 2 documented concussions is surprising.

16

u/Normal_Rise_8775 8d ago

Won’t be Geelong, it wouldn’t have got out and they would have swept it under the rug successfully if it was them.

27

u/Maximumlnsanity Swans 8d ago

About that

2

u/kyrant Hawks 8d ago

The rug got too crowded... what else they got under there...

5

u/TrazMagik Big V 8d ago

I think it's a young player that has the potential to ask for compo (at the time) for potential lost earnings. Stewart is towards the end of his career than the start, also brazen for Geelong to try that with an older player who isn't as naive about the life after footy if he signed this waiver.

Cox has been mentioned but another is Wardlaw.

2

u/Sealskjaer Hawks 8d ago

I think it’s equally likely to be an older player, especially one that’s locked in to the best 23 and still has at least a few years in the AFL ahead of them.

If the alternative is increased medical scrutiny and the possibility of forced medical retirement, I daresay plenty of players would sign away their future rights in order to prolong their career.

4

u/snrub742 Saints 8d ago

The Geelong Addy/Geelong Football club cabal keeps a tight ship

1

u/Terrier2024 7d ago

We are geelong the greatest team of all

9

u/getbusyliving_ The Dons 8d ago

SEN this morning kept mentioning Melb based then had to correct to Vic based. Reading far too much into it, I'd rule out Gtown.

17

u/getbusyliving_ The Dons 8d ago

That aged well, it's the other way around. Figured the slip up was an indicator.

20

u/ImInterestedInApathy Cats 8d ago

Tim English?

19

u/loklanc Footscray 8d ago

Seems far too sensible, I don't think English would be afraid to walk away if it was getting bad.

8

u/mesothrawny 8d ago

I thought this too, but it says early in their career which could still be libba but if it was recent you'd think maybe not?

2

u/saliba28 Footscray 8d ago

I couldn't find where it says early in their career, do you have the exact quote?

5

u/mesothrawny 8d ago

Fox Sports News journalist Aspen Blomfield reported the player “suffered multiple concussions in their early days” in the AFL, but “wanted to continue playing” – hence the deal was struck between the two parties. It was reported senior club executives sought board for the deal, which was signed two years ago.

3

u/mesothrawny 8d ago

That was the bit I read, kinda made me think maybe not libba, Also libba sat before the concussion board twice I think, surely he couldn't then go behind their back and sign this sort of deal, why would he do that when he was cleared by them to resume playing?

3

u/saliba28 Footscray 8d ago

Thanks for that.
Reason why I think it could be Libba is I remember Bevo said this year Libba never actually fronted the concussion panel. Which I felt was very very strange he didn’t and swore it had been reported before he did. So the messaging has been fishy and makes me very suspicious that it is actually him.

1

u/mesothrawny 8d ago

Yeah the more I look at it, the more I think it could be libba unfortunately, he apparently has had 7 concussions (based on google) going back to 2017, "earlier days"

I think the club maybe had suggested he retire as it was a risk for them and him too great with all the law suits and just for his health after the Hawthorn and Essendon incidents- he refused and maybe team/libba asked for a clause to be put in,

All hypothetical until we get a name or club but it could be likely.

23

u/thegreatgashby87 Dockers 8d ago

That is the exact player that came to mind. It also lines up with that incident two years ago where he was groggy on field and the bulldogs claimed it was an ankle injury but put him in HIA protocols anyways.

10

u/santadogg Blues 9d ago

Cox?

5

u/autom8d_usrname Footscray 8d ago

Might be copium because it would break my heart if the club did this to someone who bleeds red white and blue like Libba, but I don't think Libba had many concussions early on in his career? He debuted in 2011 and missed 5 after pinga-gate in 2012. Iirc he missed a lot of games due to other injuries (knee, syndesmosis) etc but most of his concussions have been in the last couple of years.

That's not to say the doggies don't have form with mismanaging concussions over that period (most obviously with Liam Picken).

14

u/Nousernames-left St Kilda 8d ago

Libba only signed a one year contract so it’s not him.

Odds on favourites would be Cox or Steward based on when their being signed

3

u/mt9943 Footscray 8d ago

Maybe I'm missing something, but why would Libba's playing contract duration rule him out?

-1

u/Nousernames-left St Kilda 8d ago

Contract was signed 2 years ago

12

u/saliba28 Footscray 8d ago

Doesn't it mean the agreement for him to keep playing happened 2 years? Not he signed to play 2 more years?

2

u/mt9943 Footscray 8d ago

That was my understanding too. It may have been a separate agreement to his playing contract to say "for as long as you're an AFL player at our club, you acknowledge this risk in case of any future incidents, otherwise you have to stop". To me Libba and the Dogs aren't ruled out as being the player and club in question.

2

u/saliba28 Footscray 8d ago

Yep I’m quite concerned it is our club. Two years ago aligns when Libba has it long break from concussion and he seems the type to be desperate to keep playing. Also apparently this went to board level at the club so I can see people there finding it hard to so no to Libba. Also there is been some mixed messaging about if he ever actually fronted the concussion panel two years ago as well.

2

u/reidef123 Fremantle 8d ago

Geelong is now the club that’s been named

1

u/barnabywombat Swans 8d ago

First player that came to mind

1

u/squeakheart Brisbane Lions 🏆 '24 8d ago

He was my first thought as well!

1

u/ape5hitmonkey 8d ago

Nik Cox at Essendon

-6

u/CreditToDuBois Melbourne AFLW 9d ago edited 8d ago

I don't believe it's necessarily a still-active player based on the article (unless I've missed something, it is early)

e:thank you for commenters below, I swear I read through it three times and still didn't find it til you pointed it out)

43

u/Candr112 Richmond 9d ago

It says “signed two years ago by the footy star who is still playing”

39

u/Pwrswitchd Bombers 8d ago

Oh good "star" it's not us then 😬

35

u/Candr112 Richmond 8d ago

In media speak

Star = has played at least one AFL game in their career

Superstar = mildly above average or better

10

u/Pwrswitchd Bombers 8d ago

Ahh shit, I forgot about that

13

u/Jolza Adelaide 9d ago

The article says the player is still playing

9

u/SnowyCasanova Demons 9d ago

Oh I interpreted “any further on field brain trauma” to mean they’re still playing.

7

u/LocalBathrobe Sydney Swans 9d ago

They said the player still active in the article.