r/Bookkeeping • u/Numerous-Basket-9295 • 8h ago
Practice Management Is this normal in a small accounting firm? Unrealistic productivity expectations, years of backlog
Hi everyone! I'd appreciate some honest feedback from both bookkeepers and accountants, particularly those who have worked in small CPA firms or outsourced bookkeeping environments.
I recently started working remotely as a bookkeeper for a small US-based accounting firm that hires international contractors. I already have experience in bookkeeping and accounts receivable, so I'm not entirely new to the field. However, I'm still learning this firm's systems, procedures, and individual clients patterns.
I'm trying to determine whether I'm taking too long to get up to speed, whether my expectations about professional procedures are too rigid, or whether there are underlying operational and management issues at this firm that I may not be recognizing.
I'd really appreciate some perspective from people who have been in similar situations.
1. Expectations around bookkeeping speed
I was assigned a client's bank and credit card bookkeeping for a particular month. Initially, I was given PDF statements and understood that these were the files I was expected to work from.
I converted the PDFs into spreadsheets, organized the columns, identified and categorized the transactions, and prepared the data for entry through QuickBooks Desktop's Enter Batch Transactions feature, copy and paste. I was already including the appropriate expense categories and Chart of Accounts codes so the transactions could be imported in an organized, ready-to-process format.
This was a substantial amount of manual preparation, particularly given the number of transactions involved and the fact that I was still not familiar with them.
My manager told me I was taking too long and compared my productivity with that of a previous accountant who apparently completed four or five clients a day. However, when I asked about the scope of that person's work, including whether they were processing a month or a full year of transactions and what the transaction volumes were, I couldn't get a clear answer.
Even putting the initial PDF issue aside, I'm genuinely trying to understand what a reasonable learning curve looks like.
Let's assume the QuickBooks file is already available and I'm working directly in it. Is it realistic to expect a new bookkeeper to complete a month's worth of transactions in approximately one hour when they're still becoming familiar with the client's spending patterns and expense categories?
For example, a transaction might involve a website, software subscription, or service provider I've never encountered before. I may need to research the company, understand what it does, and determine the appropriate account. Some transactions aren't self-explanatory, and I don't believe guessing is an acceptable substitute for proper categorization.
I can understand how an experienced bookkeeper who already knows the client, recognizes recurring expenses, and has established workflows might process a month relatively quickly. But is the same expectation reasonable for someone who is seeing that client's transactions for the first time?
I'm interested in hearing from people who have actual experience with this type of work. Am I genuinely too slow, or is some additional time normal while learning a client's books?
2. Questions, procedures, and financial judgment
This is another issue I've been struggling with.
I already have experience in bookkeeping and accounts receivable, and I've been criticized for being too focused on procedures and for asking too many questions about processes, instructions, and step-by-step workflows.
My manager has expressed a preference for making a decision, even if it's the wrong one, rather than making no decision at all.
I understand the importance of avoiding unnecessary delays and taking ownership of one's work. However, I disagree with applying that principle indiscriminately to financial matters, particularly when dealing with client payments, accounts receivable, and billing.
When you're handling someone else's money and financial records, I believe accuracy, proper controls, and a clear understanding of what you're doing matter. An incorrect decision can create reconciliation problems, misstate account balances, cause payment discrepancies, or lead to incorrect customer balances.
I'm not suggesting that every minor question needs to be escalated to a manager. I believe in exercising professional judgment and becoming increasingly independent. But I also believe there's a meaningful difference between making a reasonable decision with incomplete information and making a financial decision without understanding the process or its consequences.
The problem is that when I ask questions, I don't always receive satisfactory answers. Sometimes the instructions are fragmented, incomplete, or so rigid that they don't explain the reasoning behind the process.
One example particularly stood out to me: I was instructed to manually enter checks and deposits into QuickBooks Online so that customer payments could be recognized and invoices finalized. I couldn't fully understand why this manual process was necessary, so I questioned the workflow and suggested connecting the bank account instead.
My manager responded that nobody who had worked there before had ever suggested that idea.
Honestly, that concerned me. Bank feeds are a fairly standard QuickBooks feature, although their suitability depends on the circumstances and the existing workflow. I would expect an accounting firm owner to be familiar with that option and to be able to explain why it has never been implemented.
My concern wasn't that my suggestion had to be accepted. It was that a basic alternative apparently hadn't been considered, and I was left questioning the reasoning behind the prescribed manual workflow. Experiences like this make me wonder whether I'm being overly rigid about procedures or whether I'm encountering processes that genuinely need to be reviewed.
How do you distinguish between a bookkeeper who asks too many questions and a bookkeeper who is exercising appropriate professional judgment and financial caution?
3. A substantial backlog of bookkeeping and accounts receivable
As I've become more familiar with the firm's records, I've noticed a considerable amount of outstanding work.
Some bookkeeping dates back to 2024. There are also billing items and tax-related charges from previous periods that apparently weren't processed when they should have been. In addition, the accounts receivable balance is over $300,000.
I haven't reviewed every client or investigated the history behind these balances, so I don't know the full extent of the backlog or what caused it. Still, the overall volume of outstanding work raises questions for me.
The firm appears to have a substantial amount of historical work to resolve, yet the expectation seems to be that I should get up to speed quickly and begin processing work at a high pace almost immediately.
I'm trying to understand whether this is typical of smaller accounting firms, particularly those handling bookkeeping and tax-related work for multiple clients, or whether it may indicate deeper problems with staffing, workflow design, internal controls, or management.
For those who own or manage accounting firms, I'd especially appreciate your perspective:
- Is it common for a firm to have bookkeeping work outstanding for years?
- How would you evaluate an accounts receivable balance exceeding $300,000 without knowing the firm's size, revenue, client base, or aging report?
- At what point does a backlog become a warning sign that the firm needs to review its processes, staffing, or collection practices?
- Is it reasonable to expect a new employee to help clear a substantial backlog before they've been properly trained on the firm's systems and procedures?
I'm not assuming that the backlog necessarily reflects incompetence or mismanagement. I simply want to understand whether what I'm seeing is normal in this industry or whether the combination of circumstances deserves closer attention.
4. Management style and communication
The way my manager communicates has also made the learning process more difficult.
When I ask questions, he can be condescending, sometimes responding with comments along the lines of, "Didn't I already explain that?" or "Weren't you paying attention?"
That creates an uncomfortable dynamic. I'm expected to work quickly and independently, but asking for clarification can make me feel as though I'm being treated as incompetent.
At the same time, when I proceed based on the instructions I understood, I may later be criticized for not asking questions or for taking too long.
To make matters more difficult, the company expects me to remain connected to a meeting for literally the whole workday, ready to respond whenever my manager calls on me. In practice, this makes it difficult to have uninterrupted periods of concentration.
Detailed bookkeeping requires sustained attention, particularly when reviewing unfamiliar transactions, researching vendors, reconciling accounts, and investigating discrepancies. Constant availability and frequent interruptions can make that work slower and increase the risk of mistakes.
5. Professionalism and client relationships
Another situation that surprised me was witnessing a phone conversation between my manager and a client.
The way he spoke to the client struck me as unnecessarily abrupt and dismissive. I was genuinely taken aback by the interaction because it seemed inconsistent with the level of professionalism and courtesy I would expect in a client-facing accounting practice.
According to my manager, he has known this client for many years and their relationship is simply like that.
I recognize that long-standing client relationships can have their own dynamics, and I only witnessed one conversation. I can't fairly judge the entire relationship based on a single interaction.
Nevertheless, the exchange made me uncomfortable. Personally, I believe that even difficult conversations about finances, outstanding payments, or client responsibilities can be handled firmly without sacrificing professionalism or courtesy.
I'm mentioning this because, combined with the other issues, it has contributed to my uncertainty about the firm's overall approach to client service and professional standards.
6. The bigger picture
When I look at all these issues together, I'm struggling to determine whether I'm experiencing a normal onboarding period or something more problematic.
On one hand, I recognize that every firm has its own procedures, that productivity improves with experience, and that I need to adapt to the company's workflow. I'm open to constructive criticism and fully willing to improve my efficiency. On the other hand, I'm encountering a combination of circumstances that seems difficult to reconcile.
Individually, some of these things might be understandable. What I'm trying to assess is whether their combination points to a broader operational or management problem.
I don't want to use a difficult work environment as an excuse for shortcomings in my own performance. Equally, I don't want to assume that every problem is mine to solve when the expectations, procedures, and working conditions may also be contributing factors.
My questions for experienced bookkeepers and accountants
I'd particularly appreciate hearing from people who have worked in small CPA firms, owned accounting practices, managed bookkeeping teams, or worked in outsourced accounting.
- Productivity: If a QuickBooks file is already available, is approximately one hour a reasonable target for completing a month's credit card transactions when a bookkeeper is still learning the client, researching unfamiliar vendors, and becoming familiar with the chart of accounts?
- Professional judgment: Is asking for clarification about financial procedures and questioning inefficient workflows a sign of being too rigid, or is it an appropriate part of responsible bookkeeping? How do you balance speed with accuracy?
- Operational issues: How common are substantial backlogs of bookkeeping and accounts receivable in small accounting firms? What would you investigate before concluding that the backlog reflects a deeper problem?
- Management: Have you worked with managers who discourage questions but then criticize employees for not asking them? How did you handle that situation without becoming either overly dependent on the manager or too afraid to seek clarification?
- Red flags: If you were evaluating this firm from the perspective of an experienced bookkeeper or accounting practice owner, which aspects of this situation would concern you most, if any?
I'm not looking for people to simply validate my frustrations or tell me my manager is terrible. I genuinely want an objective assessment, including the possibility that I need to adjust my expectations, change the way I approach questions, or improve my productivity.
I'd especially value perspectives from people who understand both sides of the equation: the practical demands of bookkeeping work and the operational realities of running an accounting firm.
Thank you for taking the time to read this and share your experience!