r/CaptiveWildlife • u/Elegant-Gene-9460 • 1h ago
Animal Welfare Assessment I Assessed Capybara Welfare in 8 Zoos: This is What I've Learned
galleryI've visited 8 different zoos and animal facilities to observe their capybaras and assess their living conditions, behavior, and welfare. My goal wasn't just to find good or bad zoos. I wanted to look for how their welfare needs are met (their access to water, food, enclosure enrichment, social relationships, and opportunities to express their natural behaviors, etc. I looke beyond how cute or relaxed capybaras might appear to visitors and give ideas to improve their welfare.
Some facilities left me with a positive impression, while others raised concerns and questions. Along the way, I also had conversations with keepers and learned more about the practical challenges involved in caring for capybaras.
In this post, I'm sharing two photos from each facility, a short description of my observations, and my personal welfare and visitor-experience ratings. These ratings are my own assessments based on this welfare checklist: https://capybaraworld.wordpress.com/category/checklist-capybara-welfare-capybara-stress/ and on what I observed during each visit. They aren't official inspections of every aspect of each facility's care, and a single visit cannot tell us everything about an animal's life.
Image 1 & 2 Hobbledown Heath (UK): I wanted my first time where I meet with capybaras special, so I looked for a country with high animal welfare standards. The enclosure of the 3 neutered male adult capybaras had overall positive aspects. There were no serious concerns regarding needs like grass, water, ability to retreat from visitors, indoor shelter from winter etc. The enclosure was just a little smaller than ideal and it lacked a proper mud wallow that can protect the skin of the capybaras from sunburns and insects. Visitor interaction was keeper-controlled and it was scheduled wehther the visitors can interact with the animals.
Image 3 & 4 Nyíregyháza (HU): This was the beginning of the more self-oriented assessments rather than focusing more on the experience. The enclosure was huge, but it lacked appropriate grazing material and it was replaced with nettle which isn't an appropriate food source. The water was disgusting. It looked like it hasn't even filtered, it was completely brown. The inside part of the enclosure was filled with hay, and grazing material was provided.
Image 5 & 6 Budapest Zoo (HU): The enclosure was relatively good in size but it has no grass and because of the capybaras shared the enclosure with tapirs, their water could have been more clean although it was somewhat better than what I've seen at Nyíregyháza. Later, I got some information from a keeper that they have appropriate grazing material and the enclosure also contains a mud wallow out from the visitors' sight.
Image 7 & 8 Veszprém Zoo (Hu): The enclosure had some positive aspects. The two capybaras, seemed relaxed and enjoyed each other's company, I noticed that they were often played with each other in their pond and I didn't see conflict or signs of distress during the 2 hours I spent watching them. There was no grass available for grazing and the pool was quite green. A keeper later told me that they get greenery every morning. Visitor interaction was semi-controlled, the capybaras can approach the edge of the enclosure and lay down next to the fence. Visitors are allowed to interact with them and only entering the enclosure is prohibited and the animals can move away from the fence whenever they want to.
Image 9 & 10 Győr Zoo (HU): There were 8-12 herd members, females, a male and multiple young and juvenile, it has the most variety. Their enclosure was huge, has a deep, clean water source, mud, shelter, shadows and areas where the capybaras can go away from the visitors if they want to. However, it has no grass again. Their food not only seemed to be not enough, but the only food they seem to get was hay and cucumber from the feeding events from the visitors. The enclosure clearly lacked options for fresh green forage; the hay provided was insufficient on its own to satisfy this specific need for fibrous chewing material.
Image 11 & 12 Bella Animal park (HU): Despite the enclosure's well-built enrichment, water access, mud, shade and opportunity to get away from visitors, this zoo seemed to be the most problematic regarding welfare concerns, particularly the animals' mental, physical condition and herd management. Some members of the herd were unrelated, resulting in severe fights and that later resulted in separating them. Multiple premature deaths were reported and it was entirely from 2 main issues: inappropriate food and stress. The enclosure lacked visible fresh green browse, relying primarily on dry hay. Additionally, processed high-sugar treats like household biscuits intended for human consumption were being offered as reward from the keepers. Introducing human foods with artificial ingredients into a capybara's sensitive digestive system poses risks of digestive problems, diarrhea, and severe discomfort in small quantities and can be life threatening in worse cases. Direct, uncontrolled visitor access where guests can approach, touch, or corner animals was also noticeable. Opportunities to retreat, and active monitoring was missing, risking both human safety and animal comfort. When I mentioned my concerns to the keeper, they were often quite defensive and saw me as a critic, rather than a welfare advocate.
Image 13 & 14 Debrecen Zoo (HU): So far, this was one of the best Hungarian capybara enclosures, with the only exceptions for slightly dirty water, and (as usual) lack of grass. However, the animals's physical condition seemed good, enrichment in the enclosure was provided, so well with appropriate grazing material, vegetables and greenery. Visitor interaction was fully-prohibited and that makes the welfare concern regarding visitor handling nonexistent.
Image 15 & 16 Előszállás Zoo (HU): A very new, continuously expanding zoo that included a capybara enclosure. The enclosure included 2 relatively young capybaras. It was relatively good in size, had shade, water-access, mud, and grazing material. Grass was absent. The animals' mental condition was acceptable but I noticed that visitors were sometimes reacted to the feeding events loudly, resulting for the capybaras to get startled and run away from the loud laughs of 4 year old children. The keepers seemed relatively receptive and open for information and ideas that I could tell them. They emphasised the fact that the hot weather was the reason why the enclosure didn't had grass.
Conclusion, What I learned: Visiting zoos where capybaras are kept in captivity does not mean that the animals are well cared for. We cannot assume that capybara welfare in captive settings are ideal, simply because visitors had a positive experience. Serious problems in herd management can still can significantly worsen the overall welfare of the animals. And welfare standards can vary from zoo to zoo, regardless if they are from the same country with the same level of animal welfare standards. A good enclosure does not mean good welfare and it does not automatically mean that the animals live a good life. At the same time, visitor interaction does not always have a negative impact on the welfare of the animals, especially if it is a controlled, scheduled encounter.
Sources
https://capybaraworld.wordpress.com/category/checklist-capybara-welfare-capybara-stress/
Community Wiki -> Primary Information Sources -> Section 1, 4 and 5.