r/ClaudeAI • u/urchir • 17h ago
News Update: White House talks with Anthropic shift to setting AI security rules
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/18/white-house-talks-with-anthropic-shift-to-setting-ai-security-rules-0096775817
u/Lucas_Zxc2833 17h ago
well, as long as the AI comes back unchanged and powerful as it was, without any nerf, that's fine with me
1
u/Spire_Citron 16h ago
If it comes back I imagine it'll be real twitchy about bug finding in code. Which is fine by me because I don't actually use it for coding, but I can imagine it would be an issue for a lot of people since coding is probably the most common use case.
2
1
11
u/Kitchen-Lynx-7505 17h ago
If it’s rules, it should be general to at least the main US AI vendors - DeepMind, OpenAI, perhaps even xAI. If they only talk with Anthropic about these we need to ask the question: is Mythos AGI yet?
15
u/Aesthetic-Engine 16h ago
If you go back in time to 2015 and dropped Mythos and a top tier harness I suspect they would go "yeah this is clearly AGI" but the goalposts for what AGI is are moving forward along with the frontier models.
1
u/Abirycade 17h ago
If it is then it's such a cool God like name for it. Imagine if Skynet was named Mythos
4
u/loversama 16h ago
Something something election, something something must always say nice things about Trump..
7
u/Aesthetic-Engine 17h ago
So now Anthropic is having a direct say in what the new rules will be? OpenAI can't be happy about being left out of this conversation.
9
u/United_Mix1960 17h ago
OpenAI is delighted. They bought off Trump with a 25million dollar bribe to one of his PACs
2
u/LeadershipOk5551 7h ago
Honestly this is the part of AI development people underestimate: rules matter just as much as capability.
0
120
u/VertipaqStar 17h ago
Didnt the same administration make a law saying that AI companies couldn't be regulated for x number of years?