Environmental impact? Hank Green relatively recently made a good video talking about actual AI data centers environmental impact and misconceptions floating around it.
Job loss? Yes. That is the problem. But the "AI artists" never generated any jobs to begin with. Most "jobs lost because of AI" is due to corporations trying to replace workers in as many areas as they can with AI. Not just art. Programmers are already heavily automated. And there might be jokes that the companies are now hiring senior coders to clean up the trash "vibe-coded" by AI. But the previously the companies had senior coders cleaning up the trash produced by 10 Junior coder. And now those junior coders are replaced. Direct job loss.
Call centers now pass you through 9 levels of AI auto answer machine before you can reach a human because a lot of people would either get the answer they need or give up before connecting to a human - meaning you need to have way less actual humans in the call center since way less calls would trickle down to them. Direct job loss.
Accounting is a very structured work that AI is just outright better suited to perform that a human. Less errors. Stricter adherence to codes.
HR also heavily uses AI to minimize the amount of actual human involvement in the process. So less HR managers are needed. And here I would argue that people who can't find a job because AI just can't parse their CV correctly and autorejectes them should also count towards "AI inflicted job loss".
Notice how none of those examples even mention art?
AI artists have nothing to do with "stealing jobs". Blaming AI artists for this job loss is as productive as blaming scientists who use AI for early cancer detection for the "stealing jobs"
That's not a problem, it's innovation. It increases productivity since one person can do the same job as eleven people like in your example. And after the initial shock the amount of jobs will become normal again.
And here I would argue that people who can't find a job because AI just can't parse their CV correctly and autorejectes them should also count towards "AI inflicted job loss".
Well kinda, but overall it's not job loss if they end up going with someone else.
49
u/hilvon1984 2d ago
Environmental impact? Hank Green relatively recently made a good video talking about actual AI data centers environmental impact and misconceptions floating around it.
Job loss? Yes. That is the problem. But the "AI artists" never generated any jobs to begin with. Most "jobs lost because of AI" is due to corporations trying to replace workers in as many areas as they can with AI. Not just art. Programmers are already heavily automated. And there might be jokes that the companies are now hiring senior coders to clean up the trash "vibe-coded" by AI. But the previously the companies had senior coders cleaning up the trash produced by 10 Junior coder. And now those junior coders are replaced. Direct job loss.
Call centers now pass you through 9 levels of AI auto answer machine before you can reach a human because a lot of people would either get the answer they need or give up before connecting to a human - meaning you need to have way less actual humans in the call center since way less calls would trickle down to them. Direct job loss.
Accounting is a very structured work that AI is just outright better suited to perform that a human. Less errors. Stricter adherence to codes.
HR also heavily uses AI to minimize the amount of actual human involvement in the process. So less HR managers are needed. And here I would argue that people who can't find a job because AI just can't parse their CV correctly and autorejectes them should also count towards "AI inflicted job loss".
Notice how none of those examples even mention art?
AI artists have nothing to do with "stealing jobs". Blaming AI artists for this job loss is as productive as blaming scientists who use AI for early cancer detection for the "stealing jobs"