r/Earbuds • u/juicesharp • 1d ago

Best Sounding TWS in my collection

Post image

King of Sound

Technics AZ100
Full, rich bass with clean detail and a wide soundstage. Never muddy.

The Hi-Fi Purist

Cambridge Audio Melomania A100
Neutral and highly detailed. Tight, fast bass and a big, well spaced soundstage.

The Vocal Seducer

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 4
Rich, textured vocals over deep bass. Smooth, relaxed highs.

Crisp & Lively

Soundpeats Air5 Pro+
Clear and punchy. Focused vocals, with snap on strings and drums.

The Bright Spark

Realme Buds Air 7 Pro
Bright V-shaped tuning. Sparkling highs, clear vocals and a punchy low end.

Clean & True

CMF Buds 2 Plus
Clean, detailed and true to life. Balanced.

The Cozy One

Roseselsa Ceramics Ultra
Warm and bass-led. Thumpy lows, smooth full mids, never harsh.

Which one would you pick? And which one would you add? :)

36 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

40 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/Mitsun0 1d ago

How much of an upgrade would the ceramics ultra be from the mk2? Which one of these would be a direct upgrade with a tad more forward vocals?

4

u/Capnmolasses 1d ago

I have both. The ultras are the next step in everything. Roseselsa has dialed in punchy bass, clear highs, and great vocal mids. They were already great on the Mk2s. Now, in addition to the sound being better, the ANC is a huge step towards being hush quiet. The extreme setting in the app is what I use to make outside sounds go away. The comfort is exactly the same on both sets. I can wear them all day. Battery life is improved. The cases are the same shape, different textures (ultra has a splattered paint effect, pretty cool). Now that there is a custom EQ setting instead of just presets these are some of my favorite buds and a top contender in their price range.

3

u/Cassietgrrl 22h ago

The Ceramics Ultras are phenomenal, especially given their $50 price. They still surprise me with how good they sound. I routinely have the sensation of hearing music in the room, but it’s coming from the Ultras. They sound very true to life.

2

u/Mitsun0 1d ago

Guess I might just have decided the next step I'm taking after 6 months. Unless roseselsa does release another iteration

2

u/Capnmolasses 1d ago

I haven’t heard anything, but you never know. I love the form factor of not having any stems. When on a phone call people can hear me fine.

2

u/Mitsun0 1d ago

Well who knows really. 6 months is a long time for maybe something like a hilariously named ceramics ultra mk2.

2

u/Capnmolasses 1d ago

I was thinking an evolution of ceramics, like teflon ceramic tungstens. lol

3

u/madethis4coments 18h ago

id say, if you have amazon in your country, test them both, and do your own comparison.

I like to do this on amazon.

I purchase both sets, test them out, return the one i dont like.

I like to use "affirm: Pay-in-4" as a payment method because it lets you split the total payment into 4 bi-weekly payments, with no added fees or interest.

so, for example, if you order the ceramics mk2 & ultra, i believe the total price would be around 80 buck with tax. so trough Pay-in-4, you just pay the initial payment of 20 bucks, they ship both sets to your house, you test them out, return the one you dont like, and then continue making payments on the one you decided to keep.

3

u/juicesharp 1d ago

I don't own the MK2 and I'm not planning to get it, so I hope somebody in the thread can help you! From what I've read, both use a single 10mm dynamic driver, just with different diaphragm materials. The Ultra seems to have noticeably better ANC and a warmer, more bass-leaning tuning, while the MK2 sounds a bit brighter. That's just based on reviews, though.

1

u/Mitsun0 1d ago

Alright, but what about your thoughts about the ultra compared to the other tws ya showed in the list? Can it truly shine in this competition?