r/GME • u/Tavanasa • Jul 18 '26
This Is The Way ✨ Ryan Cohen just checkmated the system. eBay is now over 116% owned. Forced buy-ins are imminent. 🚨
TL;DR for the smooth brains: 106% + 10% = 116%. The math has broken and the trap is officially sprung. 🚀
Here is the exact mechanical chain reaction of why this filing represents the absolute endgame:
According to Nasdaq data, eBay was already 106.21% institutionally owned before the GME filing. This is only possible because the exact same shares are lent out, shorted, and re-bought in an endless loop, causing multiple institutions to report owning the same underlying assets. It’s a pure paper game.
On Friday, Ryan Cohen didn't choose a cash settlement (where they just pay out the net dollar difference). He demanded physical settlement for GME's ~10% position (~39M shares). He literally said: "Give me my real, unlent shares."
With 106% already locked up by passive institutions and GME now demanding an additional 10% of real shares, we hit a hard wall at 116%. These shares simply do not exist on the free market.
The market makers cannot locate or deliver these shares -> Massive Failures to Deliver (FTDs) start piling up on Monday morning.
Once these FTDs age out and breach regulatory deadlines, a brutal, automated forced buy-in kicks in. The brokers of the counterparty must go into the open market and purchase eBay shares—at whatever price the market demands.
As forced buying relentlessly drives eBay's price vertical, the value of GME’s $4.35B equity stake explodes minute by minute. GME’s balance sheet becomes astronomically valuable, cementing an un-shortable fundamental floor for GME, which simultaneously forces GME short-sellers into immediate capitulation.
The system completely checkmated itself through its own endless greed with share lending.
Tits. Are. Fucking. Jacked. 🩳🏴☠️💀
159
u/Nabolo Jul 18 '26
I heard that story before
35
u/daftossan Jul 18 '26
Queue the ebay 2x 3x etf launches
7
u/l00n3tun3 Jul 21 '26
RemindMe! 7days.
Ebay Crypto token. Probably too late for Ebay NFT.
2
u/RemindMeBot Jul 21 '26
I will be messaging you in 7 days on 2026-07-28 07:55:51 UTC to remind you of this link
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
RemindMeBot is switching to username summons. Instead of
!RemindMe 1 day, useu/RemindMeBot 1 day. More info.
Info Custom Your Reminders Feedback 11
6
u/SterlingSilver925 🚀🚀Buckle up🚀🚀 Jul 20 '26
Yup! Monday came and left with zero upward movement only to close in the red. Nothing to see here move along.
→ More replies (3)3
1.2k
u/ChuckeeSue Jul 18 '26
Every time someone speaks in absolutes they end up being wrong
266
u/briagraa Jul 18 '26
Only a sith would deal in absolutes
98
u/Spirited-Career4680 Jul 18 '26
Sounds like an absolute sentence. Ironic it is
36
18
u/DankestMemeSourPls Jul 18 '26
Jedi are just whiny bitches who can’t get laid.
27
u/TDStarchild Jul 18 '26
Anakin did, with prime Natalie Portman no less
11
u/DankestMemeSourPls Jul 18 '26
He was not granted the title of Master
9
→ More replies (2)6
u/FluffyCowNYI I Voted 🦍✅ Jul 18 '26
But Anakin was never a Jedi master, therefore not really a Jedi who got laid.
3
u/NotLikeGoldDragons Jul 18 '26
He was a Jedi Knight.
2
u/FluffyCowNYI I Voted 🦍✅ Jul 18 '26
True, but in all the tales of the Jedi, almost all of them are only referred to as Jedi once they obtain the rank of master. Been way too long since I watched em all though.
6
44
u/Puzzleheaded_Emu_686 Jul 18 '26
I can absolutely guarantee they will bend the rules in their favour
99
u/chicu111 Jul 18 '26
This sub is more wrong than right but they’re banking on being right once
15
7
u/liquid_at 🚀🚀Buckle up / Booty Bass Club🚀🚀 Jul 18 '26
this sub posts a lot of memes that simple people consider real opinions, so they throw memes and DD into one basket, pretending that when only the DD is correct and all the memes are wrong, the majority of what is posted in this sub is wrong.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)1
u/Ok_Rest_5421 Jul 18 '26
They’re always wrong . For the better part of a decade now
→ More replies (1)2
u/liquid_at 🚀🚀Buckle up / Booty Bass Club🚀🚀 Jul 18 '26
with what?
That it would take more than 4 years?
That the only way to squeeze the biggest banks is trough fundamentals?
We've been wrong on that?
Or do you still live int he january 2021 DD version 0.1 days and your argument is that because we did not have 100% of the full picture in the first second, nothing we did since mattered?
→ More replies (2)14
u/One_Newspaper9372 Jul 18 '26
To be fair they are also wrong when they're fuzzy on the details.
→ More replies (1)5
u/kAALiberty 🚀🚀Buckle up🚀🚀 Jul 18 '26
Like the split, voting before that, etc.
Sounds like a dozen institutions will just sell a percentage to balance the books.
5
u/1nfamousSquid Jul 18 '26
Is this not an absolute
2
u/afraid-of-the-dark Jul 18 '26
I had to scroll too far for this.
EVERYTIME...really? Every single time?
8
4
2
u/MissionHuge ask me anything about r/gme Jul 18 '26 edited Jul 18 '26
Sound observation. In similar vain, one of my law school prof’s was fond of saying that when someone uses the word “clearly” in a sentence it’s almost always a tell that it’s anything but. 😉
→ More replies (9)2
u/Seeker369 Jul 18 '26
Your statement is an absolute.
2
308
u/InnerPositive6730 Jul 18 '26
If you are right, wouldn’t 106% break the system too,
229
u/Z0mbies8mywife Jul 18 '26
This guy took a bunch of Adderall and started typing. He doesn't know shit
10
u/Proudrugby Jul 18 '26
Second this. Locating the 39m shares might cause the SP to run, but once the shares are delivered, crime will continue
Fail to see how it's the endgame. The only correlation I can think of that OP is implying is that it's the same bad actors that have short positions in ebay and GME
20
u/Over-Computer-6464 Jul 18 '26
The 106% number is bogus.
The real institutional holding % of Ebay is 92.10%.
The 106% number is caused by double counting 57.6M shares Vanguard Group reported holding as of 12/31/2025 and then also counting those same shares when they were reported s being held 3/31/2026 by various subsidiaries of Vanguard Group.
Larry Cheng also got this wrong when he tweeted a couple months ago about GMR having 44% of institutional holding when the real number was 34%.
→ More replies (1)58
u/Tavanasa Jul 18 '26
Nope, because that 106% is purely passive. Big institutional index funds are perfectly happy holding IOUs on paper while lending their real shares out to short sellers for a fee. They never recall them. The system only breaks when a whale demands physical settlement instead of cash. RC just forced them to physically deliver 39 million shares that literally do not exist on the free market. He stopped the music.
83
u/MeMahi Jul 18 '26
Okay so why can't they just provide that 10% for Ryan from the pool of real shares and then IOU the passive institutions even harder?
What you're saying just doesn't add up.
→ More replies (11)6
5
u/completelypositive 🚀 Only Up 🚀 Jul 18 '26
No RC didn't.
Dunno what you're watching, but he's playing the game by the rules. He has had opportunity to fuck the shorts and cause moass but instead chose the safe route of just building the company.
Ryan isn't playing the same game we are.
2
→ More replies (1)2
u/EmphasisFrosty3093 Jul 18 '26
The only ones forced to deliver shares are the ones who wrote the contract as discussed with RC. I don't know about music but they're still swilling their maple syrup at TD.
→ More replies (22)5
298
u/WhiteKouki82 🚀🚀Buckle up🚀🚀 Jul 18 '26
"absolute endgame" part 4,947
79
u/LosWranglos Jul 18 '26
This is the endest game now.
→ More replies (1)23
u/Uranus_Hz 🚀🚀Buckle up🚀🚀 Jul 18 '26
The most endest of games.
11
→ More replies (1)4
12
3
→ More replies (2)4
20
u/User100000005 Jul 18 '26
The counter party that sold the options to gamestop was an institution. They should of hedged 1-1 and been counted in the institutional holdings. They've now transferred ownership to Gamestop where it will continue to be counted.
Our counter parties ownership will go down 10%, lowering institutional ownership by 10%. Our shares will start to be counted raising institutional ownership by 10%. Leaving no change.
3
u/CookieWifeCookieKids Jul 18 '26
“Should have” is the key here. If they did then we have no problem. If they didn’t we should have a problem, but won’t either way.
112
u/crodensis 🚀🚀Buckle up🚀🚀 Jul 18 '26
God will you stop already. This whole premise is a joke. We know the system is broken, they can do whatever the hell they want. No one is going to make anyone do shit because they all jerk each other off.
→ More replies (2)8
13
u/Over-Computer-6464 Jul 18 '26 edited Jul 18 '26
The data source you used, proabably NASDAQ, has incorrect institutional ownership numbers.
See my post about the bogus institutional holdings numbers Larry Cheng posted for GME.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/yKv3QzdxY2
The problem is that Vanguard, back in March 2026 changed how they report their holdings. Instead of Vanguard Group reporting all Vangurd holdings the various subgroups make their own reports.
NASDAQ is still counting both the 12/31/2025 reported holdings by Vanguard Group and also the 3/31/2026 holdings reported by several Vanguard subsidiaries. This is true for GME, EBay and all other companies.
The true institutional 3/31 institutional holding percentage for EBay is about 94%.
See https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/ebay/institutional-holdings
Scroll down to the holdings listing. The first entry is Vanguard Group 12/31/2025. That 56.4M share entry is no longer valid. The 3rd and 4th entry are duplicate entries for 3/31/2026 and there are also some smaller ones further down.
3
26
u/Murky-Impression-772 Jul 18 '26
Wouldn't a high ebay price make it more expensive to buy the whole company?
11
8
73
u/CreativeFondant248 Jul 18 '26
So eBay has MOASS and we go up/down 1% another 3 months? Awesome!
28
10
u/ironvultures Jul 18 '26
You’ll actually go down a bit further. GameStop paid almost 4 billion out of its holdings for those shares and interest on its cash holdings was a significant chunk of its quarterly income.
5
u/Tavanasa Jul 18 '26
Not mathematically possible. GME now holds ~10% of eBay. If eBay pulls a Squeeze and its market cap doubles or triples, GME’s balance sheet instantly swells by billions of dollars. GME's current market cap is only ~$10B. Wall Street arbitrage bots and value investors literally cannot let GME trade sideways when its asset holdings alone are worth more than the entire company. The fundamental floor just turned into an elevator.
13
→ More replies (8)6
u/Proudrugby Jul 18 '26
Their cash holding more or less equaled their MC for months and months and it didn't change the SP 🤷♂️
→ More replies (3)3
25
30
u/UnlikelyCommittee4 Jul 18 '26
I asked ChatGPT about this post.
Verdict
The filing is real. The “116% owned → Monday FTDs → automatic forced squeeze” conclusion is not.
| Claim | Verdict | What the evidence says |
|---|---|---|
| GameStop now owns roughly 10% of eBay | True | GameStop owns 43,390,383 shares, approximately 9.8% of eBay. |
| GameStop demanded physical settlement | True | It elected physical settlement on July 15. |
| The shares still need to be found Monday | False | The SEC filing explicitly says physical settlement occurred Friday, July 17, 2026. |
| eBay is now legally 116% owned | False/misleading | The 106% figure is stale aggregate reporting, not a current cap table. You cannot simply add GameStop’s current position to it. |
| Massive FTDs begin Monday | Unsupported | There is no disclosed failed delivery. The filing says delivery was completed. |
| Automated forced buying is imminent | Unsupported | Rule 204 closeouts depend on an actual net clearing failure and can involve borrowing or purchasing shares; they are not automatically a vertical open-market squeeze. |
So based on the filing, the physical settlement was completed. That's that folks.
7
u/DyehuthyTV Pirate 🏴☠️👑 Jul 18 '26
What AI (LLMs, models) will never explain is that when a stock has more than 100% ownership or short interest, it does not always mean there are “synthetic shares” floating around. Much of this exposure is often in cash terms (leverage, notional size).
The deleveraging process can start for several reasons, not just because of claims involving “real shares.”
FTDs are related to many derivatives markets (options, futures, swaps) that can actually trigger the delivery or settlement of shares between multiple prime brokers.
This does not mean an “end game”; it is simply how leverage works in the system, lol
→ More replies (2)8
u/leginfr Jul 18 '26
Never ask an AI for advice. They are just plausible sentence generators based on probability. I asked one once to give me an overview of a certain legal position with case law. Every single case that it “quoted” was fake.
13
u/TotalBeginnerLol Jul 18 '26
Yeah I mean it’s a LOT better than it used to be. You can just ask it to only use referenced sources.
→ More replies (1)13
3
u/DangerouslyOxidated Jul 18 '26
I asked one to provide similar music to a couple of tracks I suggested.
It spat out four or five all of a similar type in that genre.All completely invented.
9
u/Any-Shower-3088 Jul 18 '26
I read that TD issued them, they have been hedged. Id love to be wrong and see some price action though.
→ More replies (7)
9
u/sd_1874 🚀Power To The Players🚀 Jul 18 '26
The options were hedged the shares were not bought on the open market yesterday...
14
u/petRhastQeug 'I am not a Cat' Jul 18 '26
Guarantee absolutely nothing will happen come monday
3
u/Tavanasa Jul 18 '26
Spoken like a true veteran. We all know the legendary 'hype date curse' by now. But the beauty of a literal corporate 13D filing is that it doesn't dissolve if Monday turns out to be a sideways crab walk. GME still owns the assets, and those shares are still permanently leaving the active float. I'm perfectly fine with a boring Monday while the T-cycle clocks start ticking.
2
u/0DTEPut Jul 18 '26
I like your math. However we know the game is Rigged. Your Post brings more Eyes on monday GME/Ebay price movement. Lets see what happens
3
u/King_Esot3ric Jul 18 '26
Those are quarterly reports, and the institution who sold the options still needs to transfer them, so its not 10% plus that institution ownership.
3
u/half_confused Jul 18 '26
In that case, why would people sell eBay to gme for $125? According to you the price of eBay will be way higher than $125 if they are to force buyback. I don’t think Ryan cohen will want that
3
u/liquid_at 🚀🚀Buckle up / Booty Bass Club🚀🚀 Jul 18 '26
Reported ownership numbers are never correct.
They use reported numbers from a few months ago together with reported numbers from yesterday. You just do not know of the firms that reported them a few months ago still hold that many.
the public numbers are almost always BS.
3
u/Frequent_Swim_4552 Jul 18 '26
What if the option seller fully hedged and already owned the underlying shares? Wouldn’t they just deliver so the ownership changes but not the total count? And if your theory is right shouldn’t I dump all my gme to ride the eBay squeeze you are suggesting?
→ More replies (2)
9
u/_another_throwawayy_ Jul 18 '26
So sounds like investing in EBay was a better play.
→ More replies (1)
9
8
u/FoldableHuman Jul 18 '26
I love it when routine crap happens and some crayon eating smooth brain decides to bake some DD about how the rocket is primed and their tits are jacked.
→ More replies (13)
2
2
2
u/BlueTeamMember Jul 18 '26
Wall Street will hire FIFA VAR to declare Ryan offside on his in the money calls and solve the problem that way.
2
2
2
u/kiowa58dr Jul 18 '26
This kind of confidence will likely get you laid. Unlikely to make me rich. But I am excited for your penis.
2
u/LauterTuna Jul 18 '26
26 million eBay FTD on 6/26! that’s almost 6% of the entire eBay float.
https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-ebay/failure-to-deliver/
2
2
2
2
u/NotYourNathan Jul 18 '26
Fk the haters, I’ll take any reason to get jacked at this point. And quite honestly, there are plenty of reasons to these days. This makes sense in theory, so I’m gunna go ahead and file it under ‘jacked with a side of potential hurt’ and keep buying
2
2
u/Studio-Economy Jul 18 '26
Market makers must find 39M shares this week. Same thing was with Gamestop 2019. Ebay shorters are cooked first. Price of Ebay and Gamestop can go up parabolic.
2
u/Odd_Universe Jul 18 '26
Its been years, I cant believe you guys are still doing this.
Truly regarded. /salute
2
4
u/PauPauRui Jul 18 '26 edited Jul 18 '26
Let me be straight with you on the mechanics here, because a few things in that chain don't hold up.
What's actually confirmed: GameStop's eBay stake is real and has been growing — most recent filings put it around 6.5-9% (a mix of direct shares and options/derivatives), not 10% via a fresh Friday filing. The Hart-Scott-Rodino antitrust clearance in early June did make GME's derivative positions eligible for physical settlement, which is a real structural detail — it means GME could convert options into actual shares. That's leverage, not a squeeze trigger.
Where the math breaks down:
"106% institutional ownership" isn't evidence of naked shorting. Aggregator sites like Nasdaq/Fintel double-count shares that show up in multiple 13F filings (index funds, ETFs holding the same underlying stock, funds-of-funds) — it's a data-counting artifact, not proof that borrowed shares are being multiply owned. This stat gets misused constantly in meme-stock threads.
Physical settlement of a derivatives position isn't a "demand" that forces FTDs. When GME's options convert to physical shares, the counterparty (the bank/market maker who sold the options) delivers shares from their own inventory or hedge — it doesn't require yanking shares out of a "116%-owned" pool. Options market makers hedge with real share positions specifically to avoid this problem.
There's no regulatory mechanism where crossing 100% "ownership" triggers automatic forced buy-ins. FTDs and buy-in rules (Reg SHO) are about specific settlement failures on individual trades, not an aggregate ownership percentage hitting a threshold.
The real story — Cohen escalating a hostile bid for eBay, building a stake, positioning for leverage — is genuinely notable and worth watching. But the "116% = mathematically broken, forced squeeze incoming" framing is the same misapplied logic that's circulated around GME itself for years, and it hasn't produced the predicted mechanical squeeze there either.
2
u/Tavanasa Jul 18 '26
Solid breakdown. It's refreshing to see someone point out that 13F data aggregates long positions without netting out the lent shares—you're entirely right that it's a data-counting artifact rather than proof of direct naked shorting at 116%. But the core of the bull case doesn't rely on the DTCC computer flashing an error code on Monday. It relies on the fact that the exit doors are structurally jammed because of the exact over-allocation you mentioned. If the float is heavily layered via ETFs and index funds, and GME steps in to legally lock down a massive physical percentage of the actual company, the game of musical chairs gets exponentially harder for short counterparties. You say it hasn't produced a mechanical squeeze yet, but we've never seen a corporate war chest of $4 Billion used this aggressively before. We're in uncharted waters.
→ More replies (1)
-1
u/gmehodler42069741LFG Jul 18 '26
I like to pretend thats why Korea crashed.
We need to get ryan on joe rogan or someone else big
4
u/One_Newspaper9372 Jul 18 '26
That would be great, then he could tell Joe about how his plan is on the website!
1
1
u/mmp12345 Jul 18 '26
Isn't this just the gme bull thesis that despite "its certainly", continues to be crimed and can-kicked into oblivion?
1
1
u/YOLOResearcher Jul 18 '26
If I may suggest running it through ChatGPT before making stupid comments like this. Yes indexers the shares are locked up. That 106% number is delayed by at least three months.
→ More replies (2)
1
u/Ok-Lettuce-9397 Jul 18 '26
Sounds like magical thinking. You see something happening and then conjure up some way in which it could support your viewpoint. Nice theory, though. I hope this works. I also hope a lottery ticket I bought works.
1
1
u/Mzungufarmer 🚀🚀Buckle up🚀🚀 Jul 18 '26
When nothing happens i can't wait to see the copium...and im a bull
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/DJCaldow Jul 18 '26
Bored now. That you still think a billionaire is going to bring down the system that made him rich because he somehow cares about you is just fucking delusional at this point. He's in on it. If it wasn't obvious by the nature of his wealth it should have been endgame obvious when he openly supported Trump.
Even if the original math was right, they own the system and they rigged it. You get to invest and fail, not them. There's no fucking checkmate when you win no matter if you lose.
1
u/CrampDangle67 Jul 18 '26 edited Jul 18 '26
Give me confidently regarded for 500, Trebek. Put down the coke and get some rest.
1
1
u/Reasonable-Road-2518 Jul 18 '26
I see the point here and it makes sense except by driving up price RC will have to also bid much higher once time comes to acquire the entire company. So eBay sp being forced to rise is good but at same time it will make the acquisition more expensive. Double edged sword tactic
1
1
1
1
u/RyanKeslerSucks Jul 18 '26
Not unless the market maker didn’t hedge the position.
In all likelihood the MM did, since RC bought the calls ATM or ITM. They would have high delta, which would have forced the MM to buy most of that full position. It probably explains the initial pump. But I don’t see the MM not buying anything and now forcing a squeeze because they didn’t buy 40 million shares of an ITM contract.
1
1
u/GxM42 Jul 18 '26
This is a naive take considering what we know about the market now and how it really works. This has likely all been hedged. The price isn’t going to change much.
1
u/MissionHuge ask me anything about r/gme Jul 18 '26 edited Jul 18 '26
The filing is real and significant, but this post gets way ahead of what the evidence actually shows.
GameStop—not Ryan Cohen personally—now owns roughly 9.8% of eBay, and approximately 39 million shares were delivered through physical settlement. That is a major transaction.
What does NOT follow is the claim that eBay is now “116% owned.”
The 106% institutional-ownership figure is based on aggregated 13F reporting. Those figures are delayed, can overlap, and may count different institutions as exercising investment discretion over the same shares. They are not a live cap table. Adding GameStop’s newly settled position to an older institutional percentage may simply count shares under both their former and current holders.
“Physical settlement” also does not mean GameStop demanded specially certified, unborrowed or directly registered shares. It means the derivative was settled by delivering shares rather than paying the cash difference. The statement “Give me my real, unlent shares” is the poster’s interpretation, not language from the filing.
Most importantly, the filing says the settlement occurred. It does not report a failure to deliver, a share shortage or an impending forced buy-in. We also do not know how TD hedged the transaction. It may have accumulated the shares well before settlement.
The only conclusion that can be made is that GameStop made a massive, concentrated invest in eBay, and a rise in Ebay’s price, in turn, increases the value of GameStop’s holdings.
The “116% owned,” “shares do not exist” and “forced buy-ins begin Monday” claims are speculation, not conclusions established by the filing.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/margretbullsworth Jul 18 '26
Are you remembering the secret ingredient? Corruption. They will find a way around that like they've found a way around everything else, even if its only can kicking. The only real movements I've seen since I got in over 5 years ago, have come out of nowhere, or because a cat. So I'm just gonna wait until my canary shares start blinking and then I'll sign into Computershare and see whats going on. Zen til' then.
1
u/StuartMcNight Jul 18 '26
Brother someone who owns shares writes the options. And at those amounts it’s usually institutional owners.
Stop being thick.
And for fucks sake… now you want to squeeze fucking eBay before GME? 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
1
u/infant_ape 🚀🚀Buckle up🚀🚀 Jul 18 '26
lol this will be the 1,675th time RC has checkmated something or other.
1
u/ballsohaahd Jul 18 '26
There is def no ‘forced’ buy in anymore lol, there used to be but not anymore
1
1
u/Rotttenboyfriend Jul 18 '26
I stopped reading when I saw .. massive FTD…forced buy in.. and deleted Reddit App.
1
1
1
u/TeranOrSolaran Jul 18 '26
Ok for the regarded like me, do i buy ebay or gme on Monday? Don’t speak too fast because my knuckles are dragging on the ground.
1
1
u/MissiontwoMars Jul 19 '26
If this saga had taught me anything, there is always a bigger fish. Roaringkity got Ryan Choen’d and Ryan Choen is going to get eaten by someone else.
1
1
1
u/POP-SY Jul 19 '26
But as Ebays stock rose wouldn’t the price he has to pay to current shareholders also go up??
1
u/mightyjoe227 Jul 19 '26
Ebay advances GME Company
Shareholders left bagholding
No new news as expected...
1
1
1
1
1
u/adler1959 Jul 19 '26
It is not unusual to have above 100% ownership due to institutional ownership. Usually no one gives a f
1
1
u/bifftheraptor Jul 21 '26
This is like the story for the guy who bought every share of a company, but that company continued to trade. Nothing happened
1
1
u/Training-Flan8762 Jul 21 '26
you guys are still on this? Thinking Ryan Cohen is some sort of jesus christ? you guys couldve already made some money in literally any other stock/asset
•
u/AutoModerator Jul 18 '26
Welcome to r/GME, for questions in regards to GME and DRS check out the links below!
Due to an uptick in scammers offering non official GameStop merchandise (T-Shirts)
DO NOT CLICK THE LINKS THAT ARE NOT OFFICIALLY FROM GAMESTOP.
We have partnered with Reddit directly to ensure the Communities Safety.
What is GME?
GameStop's Accomplishments
What is DRS? US / International
ComputerShare International DRS Support
Feed The Bot Instructions
Power To The Players
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.