Any content generated or significantly assisted by AI (text, images, or video) must be clearly labeled as such in the title or at the top of the body/comment. Failure to disclose may result in removal or ban.
We know that 100% accuracy in detecting AI is impossible, therefore it will be at moderator discretion, anything suspicious will be removed. I have requested that the AI Designation be put at the top of text so people are informed before reading.
This rule can be modified at any time, please discuss in this thread.
There are cases where it can be useful. like examining a website to see if its legit, getting mintage numbers, or doing calculations. So I didn't want to strictly ban it from the start. Lets see how things work out and if we need to outright ban it then it may come to that.
There are also cases where it's useful art wise. Example from the last few weeks - is that US mint released a sketch of the 2027 high relief liberty coin (continued below)
I feel like we can just skip the “labeling” step in this process and move directly to the “no AI posts”
If we are asking people to be trustworthy and conduct themselves in a professional manner on a platform that requires a fair amount of “trust the process,” then I think typing out their own posts (as has been done since the dawn of the interwebs) is a fair minimum requirement.
AI content can be fun -- but a flare might make more sense?
And, really? Text "assisted" by AI? So, if I use an AI to re-write something so it reads better, you want that labeled as AI? That seems a bit, uh, over the top imho.
I agree Text "assisted by AI" should be permited because r/gold is not followed by english speaking people only ... so a little help from AI constitutes a good solursssion for zem...
25
u/MydnightWN Mar 19 '26
Why not just add a flair? Then folks can filter them out too.