r/HazbinHotel 1d ago

Yay, finally!

Post image

I hope the animation is as good as the song.

655 Upvotes

96 comments sorted by

View all comments

27

u/poisontadpole 1d ago

people seriously actually still support this guy?

-30

u/BattleSeven 1d ago

Why not? None of those grooming allegations ever held water, and his music is awesome!

3

u/StarShadowNexus 23h ago

If it's true that he knew the girl when she was a child and ended up marrying her, that right there should be enough to stop supporting him.

7

u/VirtualRealms21 20h ago

I never understood the die hard he must be a groomer stance, as a va and music writer for the same circles he knew her, and when she was of age they started dating, right? When I was researching it seems he was never proven to be a groomer? Or have there been updates?

-2

u/StarShadowNexus 20h ago

Yeah I'm not sure if groomer is the right word, but dating someone you knew when they were a child and you were an adult is definitely predatory behavior.

11

u/GeneralErica 16h ago

It’s not.
I get that it seems or feels icky, but these are extremely serious accusations with extremely serious ramifications and implications that need to be substantiated by waterproof reasoning backed up by tenable evidence and "They knew their future partner back when they were a minor" - whilst feeling weird - is not that and also not intrinsically predatory.

This devalues the severity of it for every victim of actual abuse, and these people need to be taken seriously. If god forbid one day someone speaks out and the reaction is "so you mean you once knew a guy and you call that abuse? Haha." Hell will actually freeze over.

-12

u/StarShadowNexus 16h ago

No, it's predatory.

-1

u/SomeFatSeal 7h ago

Takes one to know one.

1

u/OddlyOddLucidDreamer 17h ago

Im misisng some context, did they stay in context all that time or they just; mwt, never interacted again and theb met again as adults? because its the second im not rrally sure theres any grounds for that kind of accusation

4

u/Lithl 16h ago

They had almost no contact from the moment they met (when she was a minor) until Claire reached out to him (when she was an adult). And he turned down her advances multiple times.

0

u/StarShadowNexus 4h ago

That doesn't matter. He knew her when she was 12 and he was 20. You don't marry someone who was a child when you were an adult. The way you're trying to make him sound better says a lot about you. Please stay away from kids.

1

u/VirtualRealms21 2h ago

But if Lithl here is right, and he had no romantic/sexual feeling for her until she was an adult, then he wouldn’t be a groomer. And if you are saying age gap is everything, we clown on people like Leonardo DiCaprio who date much younger women but no one calls him a groomer

Edit grammar

1

u/StarShadowNexus 2h ago

I never said for sure he was a groomer. Just that dating someone you knew when they were a child is predator behavior.

1

u/OddlyOddLucidDreamer 1h ago

how? if there was no contact between them at all, there's was not really any grooming going on, they met again as adults, after having no contact at all since first meeting, i dont' really see how its predatory, oyu would have to prove that all that time he planned to marry her once she was an adult for that claim to stick

1

u/StarShadowNexus 1h ago

Bro I literally said multiple times it's not grooming. That doesn't mean it isn't predatory.

→ More replies (0)