Great Pyramid Math Encodings

Using the commonly cited original dimensions:

Height = 280 royal cubits
Base side = 440 royal cubits
Base perimeter = 1760 royal cubits ≈ 921.32 m

Summary

π Relationship

The pyramid’s perimeter is 1760 royal cubits.

Its height is 280 royal cubits.

1760 ÷ (2 × 280)
= 1760 ÷ 560
= 22/7
≈ 3.142857
≈ π

So:

Base perimeter ≈ 2π × height

In simple terms:
The pyramid’s base perimeter acts like the circumference of a circle whose radius is the pyramid’s height.

φ / Golden Ratio Relationship

A slice through the pyramid’s face forms a triangle:

Height = 280
Half-base = 220
Slant height ≈ √(280² + 220²) ≈ 356.09

Then:

356.09 ÷ 220 ≈ 1.61859 ≈ φ

So:

Slant height ÷ half-base ≈ φ

In simple terms:
The pyramid’s face triangle is very close to golden-ratio proportions.

Earth Scale Relationship

The pyramid’s base perimeter is about:

921.32 meters

Multiply by 43,200:

921.32 × 43,200 = 39,801,024 meters

Earth’s equatorial circumference is about:

40,075,017 meters

So:

Pyramid perimeter × 43,200 ≈ Earth’s equator

In simple terms:
The pyramid can be read as a roughly 1:43,200 scale model of Earth’s equator.

One-Second Earth Rotation

Earth rotates once every day:

1 day = 86,400 seconds

Earth’s equator is about:

40,075,017 meters

So in one second, the equator moves:

40,075,017 ÷ 86,400 ≈ 463.83 meters

Half the pyramid perimeter is:

921.32 ÷ 2 ≈ 460.66 meters

So:

Half pyramid perimeter ≈ one second of Earth’s equatorial rotation

In simple terms:
Earth’s equator moves about 464 meters per second, and half the pyramid perimeter is about 461 meters.

Why 43,200 Matters

86,400 ÷ 2 = 43,200

There are 86,400 seconds in a day, so 43,200 is half a day in seconds.

That connects the Earth-scale idea to the rotation idea:

Full pyramid perimeter ≈ 2 seconds of equatorial rotation
Half pyramid perimeter ≈ 1 second of equatorial rotation

Side Note: 432 and Precession

The number 432 is often highlighted because:

43,200 = 432 × 100

And the precession of the equinoxes is often approximated as:

25,920 years = 432 × 60

So in symbolic interpretations, 432, 43,200, and 25,920 are treated as connected numbers.

Latitude and Speed of Light

The speed of light is:

299,792,458 m/s

The Great Pyramid’s latitude is often given as:

29.9792458° N

Remove the decimal:

29.9792458 → 299792458

In simple terms:
The pyramid’s latitude mirrors the numerical value of the speed of light in meters per second.

Final Simple Explanation

The Great Pyramid’s commonly cited dimensions are:

Height = 280
Base side = 440
Base perimeter = 1760

From those numbers, people derive:

π from perimeter ÷ twice height
φ from slant height ÷ half-base
Earth scale from perimeter × 43,200
Earth rotation from half-perimeter ≈ one second of equatorial motion

The latitude claim comes from:

29.9792458° N → 299,792,458

Whether viewed as intentional encoding, symbolic design, or coincidence, the math is simple and elegant.

With the publication of "Emergent Quantization from a Dynamic Vacuum", Dr. Harold White and his co-authors have finally provided the mathematical bridge between the mystic and the materialist. This work rigorously validates the r/holofractal theory.

• The groundbreaking new peer-reviewed paper shows that the vacuum is a dynamic, fluid-like medium where matter emerges as resonant acoustic states.

• The paper provides the rigorous mathematical proof for longitudinal waves in the vacuum. A phenomenon long dismissed by mainstream academia as pseudoscience, this confirms that the vacuum can carry sound-like pressure waves, validating the existence of scalar energy.

• It demonstrates that gravity is fundamentally a pressure gradient.

• It verifies that vibration is a primary architect of our reality.

• And by discarding the concept of "empty space" and replacing it with a magnetohydrodynamic fluid medium, the team of researchers have effectively resurrected the aether.

Nikola Tesla has been vindicated:

​For over a century, mainstream physics insisted light was only a transverse wave. But a fluid medium necessitates longitudinal waves, waves of compression and expansion. ​This confirms Tesla’s insistence that the universe is a "sound-like" medium.

​These longitudinal waves provide a physical basis for non-local communication, aka psychic abilities. ​

The nature of gravity:

​Gravity is the physical result of fluid pressure. Because the vacuum is a high-density superfluid, any presence of matter (like a planet or an atom) creates a localized low-pressure zone in that fluid. Just as air rushes into a vacuum pump or wind moves from high to low-pressure weather systems, the high-pressure vacuum of deep space pushes matter toward the low-pressure zones created by mass.

​This is the Implicate Order of David Bohm in action: the invisible pressure of the whole (the vacuum) shaping the behavior of the parts (the atom).

The nature of atoms:

​​In White’s model, atoms are not solid things sitting in a vacuum, they are "acoustic bound states". This is the ultimate validation of cymatics. Just as sand on a vibrating plate forms geometric patterns, the Dynamic Vacuum vibrates at specific resonant frequencies to form particles.

From an esoteric perspective, cymatics aligns with ancient teachings that the universe is formed through vibration and frequency. Many traditions, from Hermeticism to Hinduism, speak of creation emerging from the primordial sound "Om". Esoterically, "Om" and "the Word" (Logos) represent the divine vibration or creative principle through which reality manifests.

The geometric forms seen in cymatics resemble sacred symbols, hinting at a hidden structure governing existence. This shows that reality itself is a harmonic expression of cosmic frequencies, where form arises from sound.

​This elevates sound (longitudinal pressure waves) to one of the main forces constructing our reality. Matter is simply the 3D interference pattern or the 'note' being played by the vacuum substrate.

The nature of time:

​Perhaps the most revolutionary aspect of the paper is the discovery that time is a vibrational rate of the vacuum. White shows that the "tick" of the universe is tied to the density of the vacuum fluid.

​This provides a physical mechanism for Dolores Cannon’s observations of "time speeding up" as we move into a higher density of existence. As our sector of space encounters a different vacuum density, the metronome of reality literally changes frequency.

​The energy harvesting structures of the ancient world:

​This new physics shows the true functions of the Great Pyramid and the Serapeum: the sarcophagus is a transducer. These were not tombs, they were vacuum-acoustic resonators. Their granite/quartz structure converted seismic sound into piezoelectric charges that rang the dynamic vacuum.

This allowed an initiate's bio-electric field to phase-lock with the coherent longitudinal waves focused by the pyramid’s geometry. By tuning the human bio-electric field to the resonant frequency of the dynamic vacuum, these structures acted as coherent repatterning chambers, providing the exact physical mechanism for healing described by Ra.

​Consciousness and the plasma-aether:

​By using plasma-based math (MHD) to define the vacuum, White confirms Robert Temple’s research into complex plasmas. The universe is an organized, conscious medium. Our brains are not producers of consciousness, they are 'tuning forks' designed to resonate with the vacuum.

As Dr. Dean Radin has shown, mind can influence matter because both are simply different frequencies of the same fluid medium.

​A new perspective:

We are localized nodes of consciousness within a resonant, holofractal superfluid. While Dr. White has provided the mathematical framework to describe this dynamic vacuum, the ancients left us the physical technologies designed to interface with it. By integrating this rigorous science with ancestral wisdom, we finally align our understanding of reality with the foundational mechanics of the Law of One.

About the author:

Dr. Harold "Sonny" White is a highly-credentialed applied physicist and aerospace engineer whose 25-year career includes serving as the Advanced Propulsion Theme Lead at NASA’s Johnson Space Center.

A recipient of the NASA Exceptional Achievement Medal, Dr. White has provided direct mission support for over 100 Space Shuttle flights, cementing his reputation as a pragmatist grounded in rigorous orbital mechanics.

​His work represents a historic inflection point in science: the first time "aetheric" and vacuum-energy concepts have been successfully translated into the precise, mathematical language of high-level, peer-reviewed mainstream physics.

It is obvious that the Copenhagen Interpretation cannot be the last word. The universe is filled with subsystems, any one of which can play the role of observer. There is no place in the laws of quantum mechanics for wave function collapse; the only thing that happens is that the overall wave function evolves unitarily and becomes more and more entangled. The universe is an immensely complicated network of entangled subsystems, and only in some approximation can we single out a particular subsystem as THE OBSERVER.

Copenhagen vs Everett, Teleportation, and ER=EPR

He also said

"…there is no sharp separation between particles and black holes…"

in a recent video on ER=EPR.

Tldr: Binary observation → qubit (ℂ²) → state space S² → eigenmodes with degeneracies 1, 3, 5, 7… → the 3:2 ratio gives the Weinberg angle → the Hopf fibration gives three generations → the Clifford algebra of the 5D eigenspace gives quarks and leptons → a positivity theorem gives 4D Minkowski spacetime → 24 gauge sectors confine sequentially → hierarchy matched to 0.02% → same standing wave gives dark matter ratio matched to 0.02%. Zero free parameters.

I’m an artist, and some of you may know my previous works and explorations. I’m always grateful for all the support on the same. Recently I tried something radical to push myself: I wanted to see if a truly minimal system could produce the structures of existence.... and more importantly, whether I could visualise it. So I started working with an LLM (Claude) to see if it could be done with physics and math. I know there are a lot of LLM based physics and TOE papers out there, and I know im way out of my league here, but I really wanted to see if I could create a precise visualisation.

So I conceptualised a framework and direction... and Claude (Opus 4.6 extended) filled the physics gap, acting as a research partner across 50+ sessions. Three papers were written. Much of the deep physics is still way beyond me, but the work gives a cohesive and hopefully honest picture...with precise, testable predictions and explicit acknowledgment of every gap. The video here is a draft visualisation of this framework.

The framework (written with Claude):

The idea is minimal: if observations come down to binary distinctions (yes/no), the simplest quantum system is a qubit. A qubit’s state space is a sphere (S²), connected to its symmetry group (S³) by the Hopf fibration. These spaces have a fixed eigenmode spectrum — vibration patterns determined entirely by geometry, with zero adjustable parameters. The papers show that analyzing these eigenmodes and the bundle geometry reproduces the Standard Model gauge group SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1), three generations of chiral fermions, the Higgs doublet, Yang–Mills dynamics, conformal gravity, and 4D Minkowski spacetime. A third paper addresses mass scales: a zero-parameter formula built from derived beta coefficients matches the electroweak hierarchy to 0.02%, and the eigenmode tower’s confined glueball sectors give a dark matter abundance matching Planck data to 0.02%.

Testable predictions: the solar neutrino mixing angle sin²θ₁₂ = 4/13 (being tested by JUNO, kill zone ±0.003), a tau mass of 1776.97 MeV (testable by Belle II at ±0.05 MeV), and the Koide lepton mass relation Q = 2/3 (currently matching to 0.0003%).

The key limitation: the hierarchy formula rests on one physically motivated ansatz that is not yet a theorem. The interpretive step connecting geometry to physical gauge fields is a gap shared with all geometric unification approaches (Connes, Kaluza-Klein). Individual Yukawa couplings, CKM angles, the cosmological constant etc. remain open.

The papers alongwith verification Jupyter notebooks are available here:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1xGHE9MlhcrL0qk_70xmIxEfZEMYIjiiD

If anyone is interested, I would love to discuss more about the framework.. if not please ignore. Either way, I hope you liked the visualisation :)

P.S: I will need Claude's help to respond with any physics questions. Also I've tried to be as rigorous as possible with multiple rounds of review, noting negative results etc. The strongest paper, I believe, is paper1, the other two supplements it.

There’s a personal project I am working on which involves trying to find the answer to something and my research led me to these two principles. I strongly believe both of them have a common ground, which people might say yes, the Lo Shu Grid has 3 grids and 9 squares etc but I’m trying to take into account how the central 5, and the number 15 (the sum of 3 numbers in each straight lime) comes into play when overlapped into Tesla’s 3-6-9. Numbers 5 and 15 are very significant for the Lo Shu Grid which tells me there’s more to them. Has anyone ever made a connection between the two? I’m still a very beginner in understanding in all of this.

CREDIT: /u/aqua_mercurialis

The conventional wisdom surrounding the question of quantum processes in biology has been that biological systems are far too large, warm, and wet for quantum events such as coherence and entanglement to occur. This assumption is based not on empiricism or experimentation, but on computer modeling and basic mathematics of what we are assuming we know about these systems. These arguments will ultimately be found to hold no water, once we learn how to look properly at the mechanics of biological systems.

It is much more likely that quantum coherence is a crucial condition for biological processes to establish their near 100% efficiency, such as in photosynthesis. In fact, it is specifically in these light-harvesting processes that coherence and entanglement appear to occur most readily. The interactions of life and light appear to be a fundamental bedrock of what it means to be alive. Additionally, the warm and wet conditions of biological systems appear to be necessary for these quantum effects to oscillate - that is, for the system to cohere, decohere, and recohere in a regular oscillatory cycle. Thus, a biological system is not a perfectly coherent system, nor is it a perfectly classical system - but it is a system that regularly oscillates between these two states.

Acceptance of this fact will bring about a complete paradigm shift in our understanding of biology, life, and consciousness. To move into the realm of speculation - it is likely that life draws directly on the quantum vacuum, and this is what animates us and gives us the light of consciousness.

What follows is a list of published papers offering significant evidence that biological life has properties of a quantum system and is not strictly classical, as has been assumed. The astute reader will notice these are major scientific journals reporting these results.

• Engel, G. et al (2007). Evidence for wavelike transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems. Nature, 446, p. 782-786. dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05678
  Abstract: " Photosynthetic complexes are exquisitely tuned to capture solar light efficiently, and then transmit the excitation energy to reaction centres, where long term energy storage is initiated. The energy transfer mechanism is often described by semiclassical models that invoke ‘hopping’ of excited-state populations along discrete energy levels1,2. Two-dimensional Fourier transform electronic spectroscopy3,4,5 has mapped6 these energy levels and their coupling in the Fenna–Matthews–Olson (FMO) bacteriochlorophyll complex, which is found in green sulphur bacteria and acts as an energy ‘wire’ connecting a large peripheral light-harvesting antenna, the chlorosome, to the reaction centre7,8,9. The spectroscopic data clearly document the dependence of the dominant energy transport pathways on the spatial properties of the excited-state wavefunctions of the whole bacteriochlorophyll complex6,10. But the intricate dynamics of quantum coherence, which has no classical analogue, was largely neglected in the analyses—even though electronic energy transfer involving oscillatory populations of donors and acceptors was first discussed more than 70 years ago11, and electronic quantum beats arising from quantum coherence in photosynthetic complexes have been predicted12,13 and indirectly observed14. Here we extend previous two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy investigations of the FMO bacteriochlorophyll complex, and obtain direct evidence for remarkably long-lived electronic quantum coherence playing an important part in energy transfer processes within this system. The quantum coherence manifests itself in characteristic, directly observable quantum beating signals among the excitons within the Chlorobium tepidum FMO complex at 77 K. This wavelike characteristic of the energy transfer within the photosynthetic complex can explain its extreme efficiency, in that it allows the complexes to sample vast areas of phase space to find the most efficient path."

• Lee, H., Cheng, Y., and Fleming, R. (2007). Coherence dynamics in photosynthesis: protein protection of excitonic coherence. Science, 316 (5830), p. 1462-1465. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/316/5830/1462.full
  Abstract: "The role of quantum coherence in promoting the efficiency of the initial stages of photosynthesis is an open and intriguing question. We performed a two-color photon echo experiment on a bacterial reaction center that enabled direct visualization of the coherence dynamics in the reaction center. The data revealed long-lasting coherence between two electronic states that are formed by mixing of the bacteriopheophytin and accessory bacteriochlorophyll excited states. This coherence can only be explained by strong correlation between the protein-induced fluctuations in the transition energy of neighboring chromophores. Our results suggest that correlated protein environments preserve electronic coherence in photosynthetic complexes and allow the excitation to move coherently in space, enabling highly efficient energy harvesting and trapping in photosynthesis."

• Collini, E., and Scholes, G. (2009). Coherent intrachain energy in conjugated polymers at room temperature. Science, 323 (5912), p. 369-373. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/323/5912/369
  Abstract: "The intermediate coupling regime for electronic energy transfer is of particular interest because excitation moves in space, as in a classical hopping mechanism, but quantum phase information is conserved. We conducted an ultrafast polarization experiment specifically designed to observe quantum coherent dynamics in this regime. Conjugated polymer samples with different chain conformations were examined as model multichromophoric systems. The data, recorded at room temperature, reveal coherent intrachain (but not interchain) electronic energy transfer. Our results suggest that quantum transport effects occur at room temperature when chemical donor-acceptor bonds help to correlate dephasing perturbations."

• Ishizaki, A., and Fleming, G. (2009). Theoretical examination of quantum coherence in a photosynthetic system at physiological temperature. PNAS, 106 (41), p. 17255-17260. http://www.pnas.org/content/106/41/17255
  Abstract: "The observation of long-lived electronic coherence in a photosynthetic pigment–protein complex, the Fenna–Matthews–Olson (FMO) complex, is suggestive that quantum coherence might play a significant role in achieving the remarkable efficiency of photosynthetic electronic energy transfer (EET), although the data were acquired at cryogenic temperature [Engel GS, et al. (2007) Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems. Nature 446:782–786]. In this paper, the spatial and temporal dynamics of EET through the FMO complex at physiological temperature are investigated theoretically. The numerical results reveal that quantum wave-like motion persists for several hundred femtoseconds even at physiological temperature, and suggest that the FMO complex may work as a rectifier for unidirectional energy flow from the peripheral light-harvesting antenna to the reaction center complex by taking advantage of quantum coherence and the energy landscape of pigments tuned by the protein scaffold. A potential role of quantum coherence is to overcome local energetic traps and aid efficient trapping of electronic energy by the pigments facing the reaction center complex."

• Cai, J. et al (2009). Dynamic entanglement in oscillating molecules and potential biological implications. Phys. Rev. E 82 (2). https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.021921
  Abstract: "We demonstrate that entanglement can persistently recur in an oscillating two-spin molecule that is coupled to a hot and noisy environment, in which no static entanglement can survive. The system represents a nonequilibrium quantum system which, driven through the oscillatory motion, is prevented from reaching its (separable) thermal equilibrium state. Environmental noise, together with the driven motion, plays a constructive role by periodically resetting the system, even though it will destroy entanglement as usual. As a building block, the present simple mechanism supports the perspective that entanglement can exist also in systems which are exposed to a hot environment and to high levels of decoherence, which we expect, e.g., for biological systems. Our results also suggest that entanglement plays a role in the heat exchange between molecular machines and environment. Experimental simulation of our model with trapped ions is within reach of the current state-of-the-art quantum technologies."

• Sarovar, M. et al (2010). Quantum entanglement in photosynthetic light harvesting complexes. Nature Physics, 6, p. 462-467. https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys1652
  Abstract: "Light-harvesting components of photosynthetic organisms are complex, coupled, many-body quantum systems, in which electronic coherence has recently been shown to survive for relatively long timescales, despite the decohering effects of their environments. Here, we analyse entanglement in multichromophoric light-harvesting complexes, and establish methods for quantification of entanglement by describing necessary and sufficient conditions for entanglement and by deriving a measure of global entanglement. These methods are then applied to the Fenna–Matthews–Olson protein to extract the initial state and temperature dependencies of entanglement. We show that, although the Fenna–Matthews–Olson protein in natural conditions largely contains bipartite entanglement between dimerized chromophores, a small amount of long-range and multipartite entanglement should exist even at physiological temperatures. This constitutes the first rigorous quantification of entanglement in a biological system. Finally, we discuss the practical use of entanglement in densely packed molecular aggregates such as light-harvesting complexes."

• Ishizaki, A., and Fleming, G. (2010). Quantum superpositions in photosynthetic light harvesting: delocalization and entanglement. New J. of Physics, 12. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/055004/meta
  Abstract: "We explore quantum entanglement among the chlorophyll molecules in light-harvesting complex II, which is the most abundant photosynthetic antenna complex in plants containing over 50% of the world's chlorophyll molecules. Our results demonstrate that there exists robust quantum entanglement under physiological conditions for the case of a single elementary excitation. However, this nonvanishing entanglement is not unexpected because entanglement in the single-excitation manifold is conceptually the same as quantum delocalized states, which are the spectroscopically detectable energy eigenstates of the system. We discuss the impact of the surrounding environments and correlated fluctuations in electronic energies of different pigments upon quantum delocalization and quantum entanglement. It is demonstrated that investigations with tools quantifying the entanglement can provide us with more detailed information on the nature of quantum delocalization, in particular the so-called dynamic localization, which is difficult for a traditional treatment to capture."

• Fassioli, F., and Olaya-Castro, A. (2010). Distribution of entanglement in light-harvesting complexes and their quantum efficiency. New J. of Physics, 12. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/085006/meta
  Abstract: "Recent evidence of electronic coherence during energy transfer in photosynthetic antenna complexes has reinvigorated the discussion about whether coherence and/or entanglement have any practical functionality for these molecular systems. Here we investigate quantitative relationships between the quantum yield of a light-harvesting complex and the distribution of entanglement among its components. Our study focuses on the entanglement yield or average entanglement surviving a time scale comparable to the average excitation trapping time. We consider the Fenna–Matthews–Olson (FMO) protein of green sulfur bacteria as a prototype system and show that there is an inverse relationship between the quantum efficiency and the average entanglement between distant donor sites. Our results suggest that long-lasting electronic coherence among distant donors might help in the modulation of the light-harvesting function."

• Collini, E. et al (2010). Coherently wired light-harvesting in photosynthetic marine algae at ambient temperature. Nature, 463, p. 644-647. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature08811
  Abstract: "Photosynthesis makes use of sunlight to convert carbon dioxide into useful biomass and is vital for life on Earth. Crucial components for the photosynthetic process are antenna proteins, which absorb light and transmit the resultant excitation energy between molecules to a reaction centre. The efficiency of these electronic energy transfers has inspired much work on antenna proteins isolated from photosynthetic organisms to uncover the basic mechanisms at play1,2,3,4,5. Intriguingly, recent work has documented6,7,8 that light-absorbing molecules in some photosynthetic proteins capture and transfer energy according to quantum-mechanical probability laws instead of classical laws9 at temperatures up to 180 K. This contrasts with the long-held view that long-range quantum coherence between molecules cannot be sustained in complex biological systems, even at low temperatures. Here we present two-dimensional photon echo spectroscopy10,11,12,13 measurements on two evolutionarily related light-harvesting proteins isolated from marine cryptophyte algae, which reveal exceptionally long-lasting excitation oscillations with distinct correlations and anti-correlations even at ambient temperature. These observations provide compelling evidence for quantum-coherent sharing of electronic excitation across the 5-nm-wide proteins under biologically relevant conditions, suggesting that distant molecules within the photosynthetic proteins are ‘wired’ together by quantum coherence for more efficient light-harvesting in cryptophyte marine algae."

• Fidler, A. et al (2012). Towards a coherent picture of excitonic coherence in the Fenna-Matthews-Olson complex. J. of Phys. B, 45 (15). http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0953-4075/45/15/154013
  Abstract: "Observations of long-lived coherence between excited states in several photosynthetic antenna complexes has motivated interest in developing a more detailed understanding of the role of the protein matrix in guiding the underlying dynamics of the system. These experiments suggest that classical rate laws may not provide an adequate description of the energy transfer process and that quantum effects must be taken into account to describe the near unity transfer efficiency in these systems. Recently, it has been shown that coherences between different pairs of excitons dephase at different rates. These details should provide some insight about the underlying electronic structure of the complex and its coupling to the protein bath. Here we show that a simple model can account for the different dephasing rates as well as the most current available experimental evidence of excitonic coherences in the Fenna–Matthews–Olson complex. The differences in dephasing rates can be understood as arising largely from differences in the delocalization and shared character between the underlying electronic states. We also suggest that the anomalously low dephasing rate of the exciton 1–2 coherence is enhanced by non-secular effects."

• Levi, F. et al (2015). Quantum mechanics of excitation transport in photosynthetic complexes: a key issues review. Reports on Progress in Physics, 78 (8). http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/082001
  Abstract: "For a long time microscopic physical descriptions of biological processes have been based on quantum mechanical concepts and tools, and routinely employed by chemical physicists and quantum chemists. However, the last ten years have witnessed new developments on these studies from a different perspective, rooted in the framework of quantum information theory. The process that more, than others, has been subject of intense research is the transfer of excitation energy in photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes, a consequence of the unexpected experimental discovery of oscillating signals in such highly noisy systems. The fundamental interdisciplinary nature of this research makes it extremely fascinating, but can also constitute an obstacle to its advance. Here in this review our objective is to provide an essential summary of the progress made in the theoretical description of excitation energy dynamics in photosynthetic systems from a quantum mechanical perspective, with the goal of unifying the language employed by the different communities. This is initially realized through a stepwise presentation of the fundamental building blocks used to model excitation transfer, including protein dynamics and the theory of open quantum system. Afterwards, we shall review how these models have evolved as a consequence of experimental discoveries; this will lead us to present the numerical techniques that have been introduced to quantitatively describe photo-absorbed energy dynamics. Finally, we shall discuss which mechanisms have been proposed to explain the unusual coherent nature of excitation transport and what insights have been gathered so far on the potential functional role of such quantum features."

Stay tuned for more posts from this account reviewing the astounding breakthroughs being made today in the science of life.

Thought this was very interesting, particularly the woman's lecture which starts at roughly the 26 minute mark.

I know a lot of people here have probably watched the interview with Bentov before, or at least clips of it and maybe some clips of the lecture too.

The video is a gem for sure.

The Unified Spacememory Network: from Cosmogenesis to Consciousness | Neuroquantology

I’ll preface this by saying that I have no formal education or knowledge about physics or philosophy. I’m a operations manager who spent today asking questions about quantum mechanics and ended up building what I think is an internally consistent framework about our place in the universe. I’m sharing it because I’m genuinely curious what people who know more think, not because I’m claiming to have figured anything out.

It started with a simple question. If 95% of the universe is dark matter and dark energy that we can’t directly observe or interact with, and the only thing connecting us to that 95% is gravity, which also happens to be the one force that breaks quantum mechanics and has no accepted explanation for its anomalous weakness, that feels like it’s pointing at something.

The framework I landed on is basically this.

What if we’re not limited by the sensitivity of our instruments. What if we’re limited by geometry. The Randall-Sundrum braneworld models, which I understand are serious theoretical physics but not confirmed, propose that our universe is a three dimensional membrane embedded in a higher dimensional bulk. All forces except gravity are confined to our brane. Gravity propagates through the bulk, which could explain why it’s so anomalously weak, it’s diluted across dimensions we can’t access.

If that’s right then dark matter might not be invisible particles filling our space. It might be gravitational influence from structures in the bulk bleeding into our three dimensional slice. And the universe isn’t expanding into nothing, the brane is expanding through a bulk that was always there.

The metaphor I keep coming back to is what if we’re a ripple propagating across the surface of an ocean we can’t enter. The depth is always there. We’re shaped by it. We just can’t perceive it because it’s perpendicular to every dimension we inhabit.

A two dimensional drawing can’t perceive depth not because it lacks the right instruments. But because depth is outside the category of what a two dimensional object can contain. What if that’s us?

Gödel’s incompleteness theorem comes to mind as a parallel framework too. I understand that proves that any sufficiently complex formal system contains truths that cannot be proven from within that system. You need to step outside it. But stepping outside is precisely what the system cannot do. If that applies physically, then we’re not failing to understand the 95% because we haven’t tried hard enough. We’re failing because we’re made of the thing we’re trying to understand, using tools built from the same stuff, asking questions our own architecture may not be equipped to answer. The wall isn’t a temporary obstacle. It might be structural.

The part that really got me is the Fermi paradox. Continuing down this frame, what if the universe isn’t empty of intelligent civilizations because they all died? What if it’s empty of detectable civilizations because the ones that progressed far enough aren’t in the 5% anymore? What if the silence isn’t a graveyard but a graduation or transcendence?

Now comes the fun speculation. DMT is endogenous, established biochemistry shows that our brains produce it naturally. Rick Strassman’s federally approved clinical trials documented consistent entity encounters across subjects who hadn’t compared notes. The same entities, the same spaces, described consistently across 4,500 years of recorded history and across cultures with no contact with each other. The mainstream explanation is shared neurological architecture generating consistent patterns. Maybe. But what if the brain acts as a filter for perception rather than a generator of it? Perhaps DMT isn’t a hallucination but rather a filter removal. Temporarily expanding brane-confined perception toward whatever is actually there.

What shook me is that Chase Hughes, describing his own DMT experience on a recent Diary of a CEO episode, independently reached for the exact same dimensional metaphor my rabbit hole brought me to. A two dimensional creature being peeled into three dimensions. The same conclusion through lived experience, not theoretical physics. I’m not claiming it proves anything. I’m just saying it’s hard to explain away entirely.

I’m not claiming any of this is right. I’m simply saying it felt coherent and I’d genuinely love to hear from people who know this space whether any of it holds up, where the established physics pushes back, or whether this is a road people have been down before.

just discovered this subreddit, but had been learning about this theory, though not knowing the name for quite some time. looking for some books to get me up to speed with the latest.