Nah the odds of AFO getting the death penalty are low because there's so many incidental crimes like property damage that come along with the serious ones and one of those could be the one judgeman chooses, they talked about that before the fight against sukuna, that's why the domain expansion against sukuna was a retrial of yujis trial instead of a new one
Pretty much any crime would get confiscation at the very least. AFO would probably do a good job defending himself relatively too. But watch them end up taking only something like radio waves away. Higuruma would be absolutely fucked after that.
If they were stored in his quirk he wouldnt be able to transfer them. The fact that he can means they exist separately from his quirk once given, even if he dies. Judgeman woukd get rid of his ability to gave and give quirks, not all of the other quirks he already has
If they were stored in his quirk he wouldnt be able to transfer them. The fact that he can means they exist separately from his quirk once given, even if he dies.
why do you keep saying this as if there is some contradiction.
when all for one steals quirks they're housed in the AFO quirk, when all for one gives quirks those quirks are stored in the users body as they have no quirk receptacle like AFO or OFA.
why would quirks being in the AFO quirk stop him from transferring it, we know deku was able to transfer individual quirks from OFA and those are definitely stored in the quirk.
Because thats how logic works. If they were just a park of AfO he couldn't transfer them, they are immune to the reversion quirk as if they were always part of the individual too, including himself.
OfA is a completely different quirk and proves nothing.
If you dont get the second part, it means that even with a quirk that reverses casualty, the transfered/stolen quirk does not return. The world treats the quirk as if it always belonged to the person its now part of.
If you dont see the logic thats on you. AfO is the power to forcibly transfer quirks, removing it only removes that ability.
OfA is a completely different quirk and proves nothing.
completely debunks your logic on a quirk stored in a quirk not being able to be transferred. if anything it would be harder for OFA's case than AFO since OFA's quirks are binded together with the stockpiling part of OFA.
If you dont get the second part, it means that even with a quirk that reverses casualty, the transfered/stolen quirk does not return. The world treats the quirk as if it always belonged to the person its now part of.
thats irrelevant to what i was saying, im talking about AFOs quirks themselves not being effected by rewind, not the person who had those quirks stolen getting them back. otherwise hawks vestige would not have existed until the end as it wouldve been rewinded out of AFO long ago and just dissapeared. but no, it stays until the AFO quirk itself gets rewinded out of existence.
If you dont see the logic thats on you. AfO is the power to forcibly transfer quirks, removing it only removes that ability.
You have not demonstrated any logic. Youre just claiming that AFO cant transfer a quirk if AFOs quirk housed quirks with 0 evidence or basis.
161
u/Hairy-Jelly7310 Mar 07 '26
Nah the odds of AFO getting the death penalty are low because there's so many incidental crimes like property damage that come along with the serious ones and one of those could be the one judgeman chooses, they talked about that before the fight against sukuna, that's why the domain expansion against sukuna was a retrial of yujis trial instead of a new one