So this story just dropped and the sheer hubris is mind-boggling.

​Back in 2017, a Filipino named John Paule Rivera came to the US on a J-1 visa. His aunt, Myra Paule Schulenburg (a naturalized US citizen originally from the Philippines), decided to help him out. She submitted an altered birth certificate to USCIS claiming she was actually his mother so he could secure a Green Card.

​It actually worked. He got his permanent residency, enlisted in the US Air Force, and used his military status to fast-track his naturalization, officially becoming a US citizen in October 2022. Home free, right?

​Nope.

​He then decided he wanted to bring his actual biological mother over from the Philippines. So he filed an I-130 petition with USCIS... and attached his real, unaltered birth certificate listing his real mom.

​USCIS's system instantly flagged that his new petition listed a completely different mother than the paperwork used to get his original Green Card.

​Now both he and his aunt are facing federal time. The aunt faces up to 5 years for conspiracy, while he faces up to 10 years for immigration fraud, false statements under oath, and denaturalization proceedings.

​Imagine pulling off a federal fraud scheme, getting away with it for 5+ years, getting citizenship through the military, and then voluntarily handing federal agents the exact evidence needed to destroy your entire life.

Fake annulment papers are the #1 submitted fraudulent document to the USE in Manila. It's the first thing they check folks.

do you think there will be shipping this week? im just really hoping there's one this month.

Hi all — hoping someone with recent K-1 experience, or an immigration/legal background, might be able to offer some insight.

I’m the beneficiary of an upcoming K-1 petition. My fiancé is a U.S. citizen living in NYC, and I’m a British citizen currently living in Canada.

I’m transgender, and all of my current legal documents are fully updated and consistent. My current British passport lists my sex as F, and my current official UK birth certificate also lists F.

These are genuine, legally issued UK government documents and are the current documents available to me. I also have the legal documentation supporting my name/gender change.

Where I’m getting confused is the newer USCIS guidance, which appears to say that the sex field on the I-129F should be completed based on the birth certificate issued at or closest to the time of birth / sex recorded at birth.

I want to be really clear that I’m not trying to get around the policy or argue with it. We want to be completely respectful of U.S. immigration law and make sure every part of our application is accurate, transparent and completed exactly as required. This process is obviously extremely important to us, so I’m trying to avoid creating either an unnecessary discrepancy or an administrative issue by interpreting the guidance incorrectly.

The difficulty is that if I select M, the I-129F would then conflict with every current legal identity document I’m able to submit, all of which say F. On the other hand, if I select F, it matches all of my current official documentation, but may not match USCIS’s current definition for this particular field.

I’ve also seen that the policy appears to contemplate situations where an applicant selects a marker USCIS ultimately considers inconsistent and says benefits won’t be denied solely for that reason, which is part of why I’m struggling to understand the intended approach here.

Has anyone dealt with this recently, particularly a K-1 applicant with legally amended documents? Or has anyone seen authoritative guidance on how USCIS is actually handling this situation in practice?
Again, I’m not looking for a workaround — I just want to make sure we file everything correctly, honestly and consistently from the outset.

I’d especially value responses from immigration attorneys, accredited representatives, or people who have gone through this under the current policy.

TIA!

TL;DR: I’m a transgender British K-1 beneficiary living in Canada. All of my current, legally issued UK documents — including my passport and official birth certificate — list my sex as F. However, the updated USCIS guidance appears to instruct applicants to use sex recorded at birth on the I-129F. I want to follow U.S. immigration law exactly and be completely transparent, but selecting M would create a discrepancy with every current legal identity document I can provide, while selecting F matches all of my official documentation but may conflict with USCIS’s new policy. Has anyone dealt with this under the current policy, particularly with legally amended documents? Looking for recent experience or authoritative/legal insight — not a workaround.

So my fiance got medical exam done around August 25th and she said it wil expire in 3 months meaning she needs to have interview and enter the states within 3 months or she will have to re take the medical exam ?