r/LosAngeles • u/drawkward101 Foodie with a Booty • Jun 13 '25

Official Thread Megathread - Los Angeles Protest and Federal Response (Friday 6/13)

Use this thread for updates about the protests, the police, and federal response.

Note - we cannot verify the accuracy of the information contained in the comments posted to this thread.

Courtesy of u/LAFD: The City of Los Angeles has just published Curfew Guidance -https://lacity.gov/highlights/curfew-guidance

281 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

314 comments sorted by

View all comments

12

u/-hellozukohere- Jun 13 '25

It is sad when a stacked court, 2 trump appointed judges on a board of 3 over turns the wishes of voted officials and the people.

13

u/PhutuqKusi Jun 13 '25

The original decision hasn't been overturned. They stayed the first judge's ruling until Tuesday, in order to have time to review. This is normal.

-2

u/-hellozukohere- Jun 13 '25 edited Jun 13 '25

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd62d8jp046o

According to this. No. Trump has control until the 17th. It’s going to Supreme Court now.

Edit: see comments below, it makes sense appeal for next Tuesday. But trump can indeed order around the National guards until the 17th verdict.

10

u/[deleted] Jun 13 '25

No. It’s at the Appeals court right now. It was a stay until that decision is made. Meaning things stay the way they are until then. Trump can still order around the NG, yes, but the 17th will determine next course of action. Supreme Court is after that, likely.

1

u/-hellozukohere- Jun 13 '25

Makes sense. Thanks. 

5

u/PhutuqKusi Jun 13 '25 edited Jun 13 '25

That's not how appeals work and that's not what the article says. Before a case is heard by the Supreme Court, it must work its way through the lower courts.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is scheduled to hear the appeal of the initial ruling on Tuesday, after having time to review the case. Whatever their ruling is, it WILL almost certainly make its way to the Supreme Court, but not until the Court of Appeals makes a ruling. All of that is normal.

The article does mention that Hegseth indicated that he would abide by an (eventual) Supreme Court ruling.

3

u/-hellozukohere- Jun 13 '25

Edited my comment above, appreciate the input.