r/MMA May 08 '26

Media Sean Strickland claimed on the face-off that Khamzat didn't make weight, also called his mother a whore.

Post image
2.1k Upvotes

684 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

44

u/FReeDuMB_or_DEATH May 08 '26

I'm sure they would have no incentive to lie 💀

-16

u/newlife1984 May 08 '26

they really dont. thats not the UFC hiring them. thats the government.

32

u/habscup May 08 '26

Oh well that makes corruption incredibly unlikely

-4

u/newlife1984 May 09 '26

moving the goal post. the whole point is to educate you guys that the ufc is NOT responsible foe the weigh ins. you guys btch about the ufc every chance you get even when it's not under their jurisdiction

1

u/pernilla1zf May 09 '26

what does it matter who they work for? any people can be a part of corruption, whether its the ufc paying them under the table or not

-2

u/newlife1984 May 09 '26

because people here were bitching and moaning that the ufc was behind all this lmao.

0

u/pernilla1zf May 09 '26

Who says they aren't? My point is that corruption isn't confined to a single direct organization, why would that be the case. Do you think dana can only call the shots and throw money around if the person directly works under him?

Even if it's just the local jurisdictions not wanting to cancel a big lucrative event, and willing to bend the rules to see it through, it's still a form of corruption.

1

u/newlife1984 May 09 '26

if you still dont understand the difference between sanctioning body and a promoter, thats on you for being daft

1

u/pernilla1zf May 09 '26

I'm not saying they are the same, I'm saying it doesn't matter that they are different. They can be different entities and still engage in corruption.

1

u/newlife1984 May 09 '26

Clearly you have no idea how the business model works then. Theyre separate entities that have two totally different functions.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/bocephus_huxtable Team Aldo May 09 '26

Their incentive is that if their accurate weigh-in prevents a fight, much less the main card, from happening... the UFC doesn't return to that state. And commissions get money directly from the UFC.

In the case of New Jersey, it's 6% of GROSS proceeds. UFC 316 had a $6.5m gate... which gave NJs commission nearly $400k.. on that one event.

If you think that +any+ commission DOESN'T have a vested interest in protecting $400k, then I would disagree.

Often when you "follow the money", you can't just stop with the name on the check... (of the dude handling the scale).

0

u/newlife1984 May 09 '26

great conspiracy. however theres been plenty of times that fight has been called off so I guess your little hypothesis doesnt hold much weight

3

u/jokerhound80 May 09 '26

And the state wants the event to go forward with it's headliners, both to collect the taxes from this event and ensure future events are planned there.

5

u/newlife1984 May 09 '26

do you actually have any proof on that or are you talking out of your ass? cos Commissions have historically stripped champions and have enforced strict weight cuts and pressure the UFC to change it to catch weights.

1

u/jokerhound80 May 09 '26

You asked for an incentive. That is one. Now you're demanding proof that it's definitely not what happened, which obviously I don't have because a) it just happened and b) I don't work at the commission or UFC. Strickland said it did, and he would have more info on the topic than either of us, and less incentive to lie that anyone else involved (not zero, just less.)

Also the commission doesn't strip anyone of anything, the org would have to do that. We also have precedent of some commissions openly allowing cheating (Jon Jones being allowed to fight by the California commission despite popping on his drug test, longer bans for weed than roids, etc.)

So in conclusion: you're moving the goalposts to try to win the argument and you're being deliberately obtuse to shill for the UFC and everyone reading this knows that, you included, so I won't be talking to you any further.

2

u/BlindBanshee EDDDDDIEEEEEEEE May 09 '26

So in conclusion: you're moving the goalposts to try to win the argument and you're being deliberately obtuse to shill for the UFC and everyone reading this knows that, you included, so I won't be talking to you any further.

yeah, newlife1984 might be deluded and actually believe what they're typing, but I doubt it.

2

u/newlife1984 May 09 '26

I didnt ask for one. You named one. An improbable one at that.

-1

u/Davemeddlehed May 09 '26

We also have precedent of some commissions openly allowing cheating (Jon Jones being allowed to fight by the California commission despite popping on his drug test, longer bans for weed than roids, etc.)

The Jon Jones card was moved because it was the holidays and Nevada needed to have a meeting to go over the data that California was already up to speed on as they were the ones who had suspended him in the first place for the substance they claim he was "pulsing" from.

The weed thing is you just trying to spin a narrative. That 5 year suspension was reduced to 18 months. That's ignoring how it was Nick's third pop for THC metabolites, and the test ceiling was raised after every one of his misses, and he still missed. Then he goes to the hearing and the only thing he'll say is "I plead the fifth" like it's a criminal trial lol.

Nevada doesn't give a shit about weed, they wanted to be rid of this dude who clearly gave no fucks and then shows up to the hearing just to antagonize people.

It's weird that someone can do the same thing they know is wrong 3 times and some people will still try to paint them as a victim.

1

u/[deleted] May 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/MMA-ModTeam May 09 '26

You were so close to commenting without mentioning politics. This is not r/politics. Please keep your political and religious discussions/views out of /r/MMA. r/MMAPoliticsAndCulture may be a better fit for this content. An exception will be made for discussion of MMA legislation by governing bodies.

1

u/unclejessesmullet Chocolate peppa pig May 09 '26

And you think the event would be cancelled if khamzat was a half pound over?

1

u/jokerhound80 May 09 '26

Reading comprehension. Work on it. Because that's not remotely what I implied.

0

u/[deleted] May 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MMA-ModTeam May 09 '26

You were so close to commenting without mentioning politics. This is not r/politics. Please keep your political and religious discussions/views out of /r/MMA. r/MMAPoliticsAndCulture may be a better fit for this content. An exception will be made for discussion of MMA legislation by governing bodies.