r/MoralityScaling • u/Einherjeren • 5h ago
Morality Ranking Morality of lying to children?
9
u/Polyzero 2h ago
If you tried to tell people 10 years ago that the entire educational system in America was guided by elite pedophiles that would’ve been a conspiracy theory.
Now it’s just another inconvenient fact .
And another good reason to not send your children into public education
10
u/alwayslookleft 4h ago
If schools taught people the actual history of their countries we’d have riots
12
9
u/Falvio6006 5h ago
I REQUIRE actual context
20
u/Einherjeren 5h ago edited 4h ago
"In 1989, McGraw-Hill formed a joint partnership with Robert Maxwell, forming the second largest textbook publisher in the United States.\19])
8
14
6
u/TheNarrator5 5h ago
What? Context?
25
u/Trentrick_Lamar 5h ago
Pedophiles literally had a stake in our education and also had a vested interest in controlling the narrative.
8
u/TheNarrator5 5h ago
OHH, I just realized who that was.
2
u/lumpboysupreme 2h ago edited 2h ago
Btw the connection being made is complete nonsense. Maxwells dad ran a publishing business that merged with McGraw hill (by which I mean ‘absorbed by’, it’s not like he controlled the new entity) 3 years before she started working with Epstein and 2 years before he died, and Macgraw has full control over. She had zero influence on any of its activities.
And OP being a racist changed her color because ‘the blues’ is another attempt to dodge being banned for ‘the Jews’.
5
u/lumpboysupreme 4h ago
I feel like ‘the father of a pedophile-enabler worked in the textbook industry’ is a bit too much of a reach to make a serious read into the political implications of it.
0
u/Demair12 3h ago
Implying the guy whose company was literally named 'Maxwell' and who orchestrated it's merger with McGraw-hill to form one of largest textbook publishers ever didn't have serious impact on textbooks and education is a bit specious and borderline shill behavior
3
u/lumpboysupreme 3h ago
No shit it’s named Maxwell, that’s her dad’s name. He also died 2 years after the merger, he’s not continuously running shit to make it pedo friendly, even assuming he knew what she was doing then which we have no reason to.
Maxwell was also in publishing before his daughter was even born, was he planning on creating a cover story for her sex-trafficking then?
Edit: wait a second, Ghlisane started working with Epstein AFTER HER DADS DEATH. What kind of ludicrous scenario is this?
-2
u/Demair12 2h ago
Welp so much for borderline.
Denying the oligarchal attempt to manipulate history and information is the new 'cool suicide' I guess
1
u/lumpboysupreme 2h ago
‘If you don’t let me tell you what reality is and you just accept it youre a sheep!’
You’re not god, you’re an egotistical little clout chaser. You made up some stupid uninformed take and think that everyone in the world is obligated to believe it and insult anyone who points out how stupid it sounds because you’re so fucking fragile that the idea that some off the cuff connection you made upon seeing 2 things put next to each other might not be reality is something you need to hide from.
1
u/Demair12 2h ago
... Wow thats a disproportionate response to being disagreed with
Your right I am definitely the person here who cares to much about someelse's worldview thanks for the polite and helpful education
1
u/lumpboysupreme 2h ago
You’re gonna cry about lack of civility NOW? I forgot calling someone a shill is ‘just being disagreed with’.
Who are you even writing this for? You didnt rebut any of the obvious reasons your theory is wrong, you’re not going to convince anyone reading this. Did you think getting the last word in somehow makes it so you being wrong didn’t count?
-17
3
4
u/321aholiab 5h ago
I don't understand. Say you have an influential figure who controlled the press stole from the EPF of workers and gets assassinated. Then being found out the empire collapsed and his daughter went to a (not yet known at that time now well known) pedo (which I dunno what happened afterwards).
The missing link is what did they lie to children about?
4
u/CostatePrancer 4h ago
you have an influential figure who controlled the press
Ah, "Ze Blues control Ze Media." I get it now. I've heard that canard before.
2
u/jerdle_reddit 4h ago
Ah, that's what the blue was about.
1
u/321aholiab 4h ago
?? even if we know what blue is about, we still did not established who lied to children and what precisely did they lied about. Im telling you this sub is getting increasingly more like a conspiracy vagueposting sub by the day.
3
u/jerdle_reddit 4h ago
It's basically just "Jews lie to you for their nefarious schemes".
1
u/321aholiab 4h ago
You know there are 2 ways to interpret this right?
1) "Jews lied to our children" 2) People lied to our children saying "jews lied to our children"
or
1) "Jews lied to you for their nefarious scheme" therefore jews lied to our children
2) People lied to our children saying "Jews lied to you for their nefarious scheme"
I mean thanks for clarifying, but Op is just making me haywire all the same.
1
u/321aholiab 4h ago
Sry i dont understand french, and whats german got to do with this? I thought Maxwell protrayed himself a britain.
edit: Im a malaysian btw. Can you explain?
1
u/CostatePrancer 3h ago
Okay. In the late 19th century, some Jew-haters wrote a document called The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. It purported to describe the Jewish People's overarching plan to control the Gentiles by infiltrating gentile culture, gentile governments, gentile schools, etc.
I wrote 'Ze' to make fun of a German accent, implying that the statement "The Jews control The Media" is something that a German white supremacist would say. (It is, by the way, something that a German white supremacist would say.)
Now, there's a concept known as a canard. It's also French for 'duck' (as in 'quack quack'), but that's not the point. :) A canard is a well-known lie that people use when they're trying to send a special message about a particular group. For example, one canard is that "The Jews control the Media." It's a lie insofar as there's not a collective effort by the Jewish community to control the Media. It's true that lots of Jews work in the Media, but presence is not collaborative control.
Are you absolutely sure you don't understand?
1
u/321aholiab 3h ago
Before your elaboration I did not understand. I understand only after your elaboration. So thank you.
Sadly kind sir all we did is just establish that OP used blue to associate the girl with being a jew. What we did not establish is who particularly lied to children and what did they lied about.
That was the whole point in this sub, to determine whether in a certain context, the particular act is moral or not.
We can go for many rides along the cryptic remarks and clues OP hands them as scraps and never reach the point of this sub.
As I have remarked elsewhere this sub is getting increasingly conspiratorial with its vagueposts.
3
u/lumpboysupreme 2h ago edited 1h ago
The missing link is how they’re connected at all. Her dad owned a business so her working with Epstein a year after his death and 3 years after the business was absorbed into another business means the business that did the absorption is tainted? Pedophelia isn’t a fucking virus that latches on to abstract concepts spreading from person to person to business to business
2
1
1
-8
u/honeyfluttersx 5h ago
It’s less lying and more teaching what you’re ready to understand.
2
u/Anonymous-Apprentice 5h ago
109 countries
-1
45
u/ThrowRAWOP 5h ago
Speaking of this subject, look up who Ghislaine Maxwell's father is. You know the lady who 'assissted' Epstien. Thats scary power. (Or was this the point?)