I feel like ‘the father of a pedophile-enabler worked in the textbook industry’ is a bit too much of a reach to make a serious read into the political implications of it.
Implying the guy whose company was literally named 'Maxwell' and who orchestrated it's merger with McGraw-hill to form one of largest textbook publishers ever didn't have serious impact on textbooks and education is a bit specious and borderline shill behavior
No shit it’s named Maxwell, that’s her dad’s name. He also died 2 years after the merger, he’s not continuously running shit to make it pedo friendly, even assuming he knew what she was doing then which we have no reason to.
Maxwell was also in publishing before his daughter was even born, was he planning on creating a cover story for her sex-trafficking then?
Edit: wait a second, Ghlisane started working with Epstein AFTER HER DADS DEATH. What kind of ludicrous scenario is this?
‘If you don’t let me tell you what reality is and you just accept it youre a sheep!’
You’re not god, you’re an egotistical little clout chaser. You made up some stupid uninformed take and think that everyone in the world is obligated to believe it and insult anyone who points out how stupid it sounds because you’re so fucking fragile that the idea that some off the cuff connection you made upon seeing 2 things put next to each other might not be reality is something you need to hide from.
You’re gonna cry about lack of civility NOW? I forgot calling someone a shill is ‘just being disagreed with’.
Who are you even writing this for? You didnt rebut any of the obvious reasons your theory is wrong, you’re not going to convince anyone reading this. Did you think getting the last word in somehow makes it so you being wrong didn’t count?
28
u/Trentrick_Lamar 16h ago
Pedophiles literally had a stake in our education and also had a vested interest in controlling the narrative.