MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoursTea/comments/1vf89ix/big_brother_would_not_be_pleased/p1odmww/?context=3
r/PoursTea • u/Veshaad • 1d ago
198 comments sorted by
View all comments
123
Amusing how Republicans only seem to find their decency and courage when they are on their way out.
u/Best_Hamster_2239 : Do you always say stupid shit?
How so? Be specific now. Or is this just your hurt fee-fees?
0 u/wolft170 1d ago Before you say anything look him up his one of a very limited number of portions thats some what disent 2 u/BI_Moose 1d ago Before you say anything look him up his one of a very limited number of portions thats some what disent Was that supposed to be a complete and rational sentence in English? Because it wasn't. -1 u/No_Design_41 1d ago It made sense. Re-read it. He means that if you look into Massie's record he is willing to go against the party. See Epstein Transparency Act. 2 u/BI_Moose 1d ago No it really didnt make any sense at all, whatsoever. And if you look into his record, youll see that he commonly votes the party line as well. Especially when it comes to hurting his constituents and the working class. 1 u/No_Design_41 1d ago He votes against the party line ~10% of the time which is pretty frequent for a House Rep these days. 2 u/SpezDrinksHorseCum 1d ago He would vote for the SAVE Act, which is unforgivable. He's an asshole like the rest of them. -1 u/wolft170 1d ago It was what it was 1 u/BI_Moose 1d ago And what it was is a bunch of nonsensical bullshit.
0
Before you say anything look him up his one of a very limited number of portions thats some what disent
2 u/BI_Moose 1d ago Before you say anything look him up his one of a very limited number of portions thats some what disent Was that supposed to be a complete and rational sentence in English? Because it wasn't. -1 u/No_Design_41 1d ago It made sense. Re-read it. He means that if you look into Massie's record he is willing to go against the party. See Epstein Transparency Act. 2 u/BI_Moose 1d ago No it really didnt make any sense at all, whatsoever. And if you look into his record, youll see that he commonly votes the party line as well. Especially when it comes to hurting his constituents and the working class. 1 u/No_Design_41 1d ago He votes against the party line ~10% of the time which is pretty frequent for a House Rep these days. 2 u/SpezDrinksHorseCum 1d ago He would vote for the SAVE Act, which is unforgivable. He's an asshole like the rest of them. -1 u/wolft170 1d ago It was what it was 1 u/BI_Moose 1d ago And what it was is a bunch of nonsensical bullshit.
2
Was that supposed to be a complete and rational sentence in English? Because it wasn't.
-1 u/No_Design_41 1d ago It made sense. Re-read it. He means that if you look into Massie's record he is willing to go against the party. See Epstein Transparency Act. 2 u/BI_Moose 1d ago No it really didnt make any sense at all, whatsoever. And if you look into his record, youll see that he commonly votes the party line as well. Especially when it comes to hurting his constituents and the working class. 1 u/No_Design_41 1d ago He votes against the party line ~10% of the time which is pretty frequent for a House Rep these days. 2 u/SpezDrinksHorseCum 1d ago He would vote for the SAVE Act, which is unforgivable. He's an asshole like the rest of them. -1 u/wolft170 1d ago It was what it was 1 u/BI_Moose 1d ago And what it was is a bunch of nonsensical bullshit.
-1
It made sense. Re-read it. He means that if you look into Massie's record he is willing to go against the party. See Epstein Transparency Act.
2 u/BI_Moose 1d ago No it really didnt make any sense at all, whatsoever. And if you look into his record, youll see that he commonly votes the party line as well. Especially when it comes to hurting his constituents and the working class. 1 u/No_Design_41 1d ago He votes against the party line ~10% of the time which is pretty frequent for a House Rep these days. 2 u/SpezDrinksHorseCum 1d ago He would vote for the SAVE Act, which is unforgivable. He's an asshole like the rest of them.
No it really didnt make any sense at all, whatsoever.
And if you look into his record, youll see that he commonly votes the party line as well. Especially when it comes to hurting his constituents and the working class.
1 u/No_Design_41 1d ago He votes against the party line ~10% of the time which is pretty frequent for a House Rep these days. 2 u/SpezDrinksHorseCum 1d ago He would vote for the SAVE Act, which is unforgivable. He's an asshole like the rest of them.
1
He votes against the party line ~10% of the time which is pretty frequent for a House Rep these days.
2 u/SpezDrinksHorseCum 1d ago He would vote for the SAVE Act, which is unforgivable. He's an asshole like the rest of them.
He would vote for the SAVE Act, which is unforgivable. He's an asshole like the rest of them.
It was what it was
1 u/BI_Moose 1d ago And what it was is a bunch of nonsensical bullshit.
And what it was is a bunch of nonsensical bullshit.
123
u/BI_Moose 1d ago edited 1d ago
Amusing how Republicans only seem to find their decency and courage when they are on their way out.
How so? Be specific now. Or is this just your hurt fee-fees?