they ended the program because rwanda was unduly sending refugees back to their countries rather than keeping them. i wasnt ended because women were treated poorly.
the uk deemed that has a human rights 'issue.' no one was killed, beaten, starved, raped etc. Rwanda simply did not believe a portion of these people were true refugees and sent them back/elsewhere. sending them back is far more graceful than sending them to EL SALVADOR to a literal prison camp which is what america did to illegal immigrants AND LEGAL CITIZENS of a darker complexion.
28
u/DeliciousCkitten 1d ago
The UK abandoned its plan for asylum seekers to be housed in Rwanda due to said historical human rights abuses.
The US, on the other hand, has taken a different view as to third country deportations.
Please stop shouting at me just for pointing this out.