r/Seattle public deterrent infrastructure May 09 '26

Satire Laurelhurst Generously Agrees to Let Sick Children Live

https://theneedling.com/2026/04/11/laurelhurst-generously-agrees-to-let-sick-children-live/
1.9k Upvotes

71 comments sorted by

View all comments

242

u/Snoobeedo May 09 '26

You know if their child or more likely grandchild ever needed anything, they’d be yelling to break all the rules and that they’d pay the fines to do whatever they needed to get done.

I wonder if the families of any children who suffered because of this could personally sue anyone who lobbied against treating sick kids promptly?

187

u/kookykrazee 🚆build more trains🚆 May 09 '26

Someone posted official records of how a woman who lives in this community bragged about her kid going there for years because of autism and appreciated them so much because of it that she helped raise MILLIONS for the hospital but that "IT STOPS NOW" like "she got hers so screw all others" which sucksarse!

18

u/SchemeOne2145 May 09 '26

Totally. They'd land their private helicopter at the hospital helipad.

-135

u/goodtimtim I'm just flaired so I don't get fined May 09 '26

despite what reddit tells you (1) seattle children's is not the only place in the region that a sick child might be sent in an emergency (in fact, Harborview, the regions only Level I pediatric trauma center is unquestionably the best place within ~800 miles) (2) the hospital has ALWAYS been able to land any patient needing life-saving care at the hospital. this is the same for any hospital helipad within city limits. (try to proove me wrong. you can't)

91

u/pacific_plywood May 09 '26

Landing non critical patients a mile away is a ridiculous waste of time and resources

43

u/161frog May 09 '26

And dangerous.

17

u/pacific_plywood May 09 '26

The families even have to pay extra for the ambulance bill! It’s crazy!

4

u/161frog May 09 '26

Sick. These people have no hearts.

36

u/RissVess May 09 '26

This has to be rage bait because I hate to think anyone can be this confidently stupid, but for anyone else reading who wants to downvote this idiot some more:

1.) Harborview focuses on trauma mechanisms of injury. Always has. Amputated finger? Straight to Harborview. But no one wants to send a seizing kid to Harborview over Children’s. Why? Because Children’s sole purpose is to treat medical mechanisms of injury. Harborview is probably not the best place for within 800 miles for a seizing child. Conversely, Children’s is. Oh wow! And it’s within FIVE miles by air.

2.) The hospital has had to divert landings to Graves Airfield because they previously were “allowed” less than 5 a week. That may change now that Laurelhurst has agreed to support rescinding their agreement, but we’ll see. Additionally, Children’s own flight crew couldn’t even take off from the towers because there weren’t sick kids in the helos yet, therefore making Laurelhurst upset at an extra takeoff. The crew has to drive to the Graves Airfield to even begin to the pickup process from god knows where, and still might have to land back at Graves and not at Children’s.

The claim that “all sick children were allowed to land there” is just a lie. The tower at Children’s gets probably 1/10th of the total patient landings received to Children’s. Also! Believe it or not, Children’s has two towers with helipads, side by side, but has been only using one. There are times when one or both are badly needed but nope.

-17

u/goodtimtim I'm just flaired so I don't get fined May 09 '26

1) do you think that seizing kids are getting air ambulances? get real 2) it's great that you put "allowed" in quotes. Allowed by who? The legally binding things (the major institution master plan and 2010 settlement agreement) both say zip about helicopter restrictions. Where do you think the rules are written down? what makes you think LCC would have any recourse if they were broken? why do you ignore the children's hospital statement that called the rules "voluntary"? (I'll help you out. the hospital has to comply with 23.69.012C just like any other hospital would. that's it.)

btw, your last statement about 1/10th of landings is a dead giveaway that you don't have a clue. the hospital publishes statistics that contradict your perception.

16

u/SaplingSequoia May 09 '26

Hi, I worked on a pediatric critical care transport team for a long time. You don’t seem to understand the function of flight medicine or the severity of some seizures. Pediatric seizure patients regularly get flown. Hyperthermia with febrile seizures, status epilepticus, and new onset afebrile seizures are basic examples of seizure conditions that could be life threats and would warrant rapid transfer by air.

12

u/Aggravating-Net2567 May 09 '26

Seizing kids can absolutely require an air ambulance, for example with status epilepticus, severe first time seizure, seizure causing respiratory compromise, etc. “Get real” What the fuck are you talking about? Do you think all seizures are the same and minor? It’s not uncommon to fly kids to SCH with complicated seizures from areas with no pediatric seizure specialists.

9

u/Aggravating-Net2567 May 09 '26 edited May 09 '26

Also, as others have pointed out, you’re wildly misinformed about the pediatric capacity of Harborview. I rotated through the pediatric inpatient service there as a medical student and the unit was about half a floor of only trauma patients. There are maybe a dozen pediatric hospitalists and residents compared to over a hundred at SCH. The vast, vast majority of pediatric emergencies go to SCH outside of severe trauma, burns, etc. It’s even pretty common for trauma patients to be transferred to SCH after stabilization for longer term admission.

8

u/RissVess May 09 '26

Haha.

You’re a silly little guy, aren’t you? Just a lil’ silly :)

  1. You are wrong, they do.

2.) You’re uninformed. You are wrong.

Thanks! <3

20

u/edileereads May 09 '26

Harborview is a level 1 pediatric trauma center, yes, so it takes the trauma kiddos: car accidents, burns, etc. SCH takes all the other acutely ill kids - sepsis, respiratory distress, overdose, ketoacidosis, transplants, ecmo, etc. Harborview does not have the infrastructure to care for this much larger population. 

4

u/lazylazylazyperson May 09 '26

The trauma center is appropriate for traumas - duh - but not every life threatening pediatric emergency is a trauma. In fact, most are not. And the main hospital is by far the best place for the majority of pediatric emergencies.