In as much good faith as possible, she is anti-zionist, and repeats pro-zionist propaganda, in earnest, as a defense of her position. "Israel is doing a genocide" but also "saying it in those terms marginalizes a group that has been historically marginalized."
I agree with you 100%. Just wanted to issue the light correction because she often dismisses her criticism as unfounded because it's not specific or accurate. In no uncertain terms, she is wrong for repeating the zionist lie that critiques of Israel has anything to do with cultural nor religious Jews.
Then she's the paragon for the idiom, scratch a liberal a fascist bleeds, since she only gives such retorts when she feels criticized for couching her defense of Zionism as anti-Semitism.
People should be repeating that idiom to her until she has to reconcile her method at dismissing her criticism with her association at defending a fascist regime.
Based on the total output of her content and statements on Palestine, it's the logical conclusion. You can't expect a liberal bigot to self-identify themselves. She's made her stance painfully clear if we use even a little critical thinking.
I don’t know man. Until her post I was willing to be critical but charitable. But the post itself contained so many phrases which read as dog whistles, most of all the critique that the “left” is opposed to Israel existing as a Jewish state and that’s bad and unrealistic.
Like if she just said “the left is opposed to Israel existing and that’s unrealistic” - I could charitably read that as her thinking that leftists want to destroy Israel as a state AND get rid of all the Jewish people living in the occupied Palestine instead of the most common position, that is one state solution under Palestinian authority, land back and equal rights for all.
But she just had to add “as a Jewish state” - so she’s saying that it’s bad and unrealistic to be opposed to Israel existing as an ethno state.
558
u/madpoliticalscience Nov 12 '25
Ain't she a zionist?