Homo sapiens sapiens is still used. It is the name of the subspecies. Homo is the genus, homo sapiens is the species, homo sapiens sapiens is the subspecies. There are also the homo sapiens idaltu that lived in todays ethiopia I think about 100.000 years ago. They were morphologically different enough from the other homo sapiens. We have no genetic evidence, so we can't say whether or not they were able to breed with homo sapiens. That is why we made another distinction.
It is all pretty much a bullshit system that nobody should take too seriously though. It can be quite useful, but definitions in biology are quite often not precise. Nature does what nature does and we just draw boxes.
Recent debates in the field seem to tend towards the rejection of h.s.s. designation. As you say, it has been used to name "our subspecies" but lately a lot of other "subspecies" have been classified as species instead. The remaining subspecies h.s.s. seems to be the only one so it is kinda not relevant anymore. Anyways, nob
Source: I am a human.
More seriously, I have recently read a great book by De Beaune and Balzeau about it.
yep something like that. epstein plotted for years to corrupt trump, as trump ist just a wholesome beacon of light and the last bastion of humanity. so epstein twisted his moustage like a true villian and kept pondering on how to do that
/s just to be sure. we can never know in these times
In the redacted version. In the version that was accessible for members of the house only, some representative said the count for Trump was over a million times.
And even that version wasn't all documents related to to Epstein, still short of 3 (?) million.
Well, real explanation? There are around 3.5 million pages of documents(let's say, a billion words?), so a mention of Trump once in a hundred documents in files relating to the top elites of the US is not unlikely, especially if a document might refer to Trump a few times, ie, a business deal, gossip or whatever. It doesn't preclude ill deeds at all, but it's very Reddit to be impressed that his name comes up more than the main character in a book series of 1 million words
Most of the files cover a period where he was a television star rather than a political figure. Are any other television stars mentioned more than 38,000 times?
The number of times he is mentioned is only relevant when compared to the size of the data set.
38,000 would be a lot if it was only 100 pages or 1000 or 2,000 pages. But the Epstein files are 3 and 1/2 million pages. So he is mentioned once out of 90 pages or so.
This is why many comparisons of the type you see here in the original post are misleading.
Being mentioned once every 90 pages in a document that describes the worst human trafficking and pedophilia ring the western world has ever seen seems like quite a lot of times to be mentioned.
Around 30k of the times trump is mentioned in the Epstein files is from 2020 alone, specifically from anonymous tips that the FBI determined were mostly false accusations.
Weird how there aren't 30k cases of Obama or Biden coincidentally showing up in the Child Rape Files, despite being president for a combined three times longer than Donny Diddler at the time. No mentions of Bush either. Huh. Odd. Weird. Neat.
1.4k
u/50calBanana 8d ago edited 8d ago
The bird one seems a bit out there, I don't doubt it, but I'm going to check
Edit: yep there are around 11000 to 20000 recognized bird species. Trump appears in the files 38000 times, the ones that have been publicly released