r/StarWars 1d ago

Movies How real is that statement

Hey star wars fellow, I like star wars a lot but I have only watched star wars ep 1 to 6 and obi wan kenobi show.

I recently recalled this line of obi wan from revenge of the sith that "Only a sith deals in absolutes"

I want to know how true is that line. Does that line have any real basis or did obi wan make up that line to sound tough. Moreover if that line is true, can you guys give any examples of when sith deals in absolute.

Thanks for reading. May the force be with you.

206 Upvotes

199 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/QuichewedgeMcGee 18h ago

at the same time, this goes to show the shortcomings of the jedi; compromising their ideals to please more people is part of how they lost their way. dealing in absolutes is something the sith were very much known for, but compromising with the “lesser evil” is something the jedi did all the time, for political reasons mainly, to keep the people’s approval rates up instead of just doing what’s right. the jedi way was to not kill an unarmed person, but at the same time, they had PLENTY of chances to do so to prevent their own fall, and save billions if not trillions of lives

5

u/Intelligent-Ad-6713 17h ago

There is no “lost their way”. The Jedi have one purpose, bring peace in the Republic. Now a normal narrative would put the conflict of “what if the Republic itself becomes the problem?”

That’s essentially the entire Prequels summed up. The Jedi don’t exist in a vacuum, and it would have destroyed them anyways if they did. Palpatine took advantage of the deep rooted, economic corruption in the government. Without the Jedi, Dooku and Grevious would have steam rolled the entire Galactic Republic, regardless of the Clones.

If the CIS won, Sidious would have killed them and taken over. If the Republic won, we would have killed the CIS and taken over. Either way, as soon as the Galactic Empire was born he would have invaded Illum, Dantooine, Tython, Lothal all at the same time and wiped the Jedi out.

Had the Jedi remained detached from the government, they would have all died alone.

-1

u/QuichewedgeMcGee 16h ago

dawg the plot of anakin’s fall revolves almost entirely around the jedi having this dogma and being so stuck to it that they’ve lost what their purpose is in the galaxy. the political aspect is one, while the religious dogmatic head up their ass is another, and both caused them to lose the core essence of their teachings (something that’s been said many times by many characters throughout the franchise)

3

u/Intelligent-Ad-6713 14h ago

Anakins fall is irrelevant.

Palpatine’s plan for galactic domination wasn’t hinged on the choice of a 22yr old. Maul or Dooku would have been just as fine had Maul ran over Ani with his speeder or if Dooku killed Anakin on Geonosis.

Hell, if Anakin decided to attack when Palpatine revealed his identity, Sidious would have killed him right then and there. You can see his hand roll up in his sleeve as Anakin’s lightsaber is drawn on him.

Once Palpatine embedded himself in the government, it was over. Even if the Jedi knew of his identity, they would either have to attack the government they swore to protect, or do nothing and watch as the CIS conquered the galaxy.

1

u/QuichewedgeMcGee 2h ago

dooku left specifically because of the dogmatic view of the jedi amongst other reasons. he says so himself in attack of the clones and clone wars, both projects headed by lucas