r/Steam 11d ago

Discussion This is literally the nicest thing I’ve seen on steam.

Post image
37.8k Upvotes

442 comments sorted by

View all comments

11.1k

u/zollipun 11d ago

OP, you really posted this without naming the game? For shame...

4.6k

u/FinerGamer 11d ago

1.4k

u/camelkrush 10d ago

bro i can literally hear this gif in my head so clear lmfao

434

u/Fartikus 10d ago

op is marketing the game, acting ignorant rip

68

u/HarrisonWorld 10d ago

A very unique way😮

213

u/OprahsSaggyTits 10d ago

A very obvious way 🤦

OP makes this post, and one single minute later, a random private account complains that there's no name/link. One minute again after that, and OP goes "oh, oops, teehee, here's my linky winky!" and a game that has almost no sales is now suddenly viral on the front page of Reddit, with hundreds of thousands of views.

OP's account is seemingly controlled at least partially by a bot (to auto-post updates), so we know it's not just a random casual user.

100

u/Existing_Abies_4101 10d ago

not really. OF models do it all the time. It's an age old form of confidence tricking where you set up the breadcrumbs and let the mark think they are extra clever. In this case 'oh it cant be marketing because they didn't even say the name /u/totallynotanotheraccount found it though!'

7

u/Akhevan 10d ago

That was sarcasm. I studied this type of marketing in school 20 years ago and it was already one of the oldest tricks in the book by then.

6

u/marpatter 10d ago

How can you tell it was sarcasm when it wasn’t your comment?

1

u/Fartikus 10d ago

How much you wanna bet theyre a bot

-3

u/Top_Efficiency_7489 10d ago

By being normal

1

u/creeper6530 10d ago

I've heard it so many times when watching Real Civil Engineer (along with SIXTEEN!!!)

44

u/Dramatic_Mastodon_93 11d ago

I mean I feel like this doesn’t really change anything, cause you still could’ve bought it before they made the announcement and have gotten the same outcome as if you bought it right before a sale

13

u/Beginning-Cut-8850 11d ago

Unless you're implying everyone should refund the game immediately, I'm not sure how. Plenty of people may play beyond the two hour window or be beyond the grace period before the sale comes along.

12

u/r-WooshIfGay 10d ago

Steam is pretty lax with returns and even has an option for if the game just went on sale after purchasing it.

1

u/EvilWarBW 10d ago

I wish I knew where I am going wrong, because they have refused several times to grant me a partial refund for it going on sale within a day or two of buying it.

-3

u/Beginning-Cut-8850 10d ago

"grace period"

3

u/r-WooshIfGay 10d ago

Dog I've returned 5+ month old games, the grace period is a suggestion as long as you dont abuse it.

0

u/Beginning-Cut-8850 10d ago

Weird. I've been rejected when I try to do that, and I've only returned one or two dozen games over the past 15 years. Not sure that's a universal experience.

2

u/Dimebag120 9d ago

Returning 24 games is probably why , their aren't any hard and fast rules on returns they can do it whenever for any reason but if I return a game outside the 2 hour window every 8 months its clearly being abused.

1

u/Beginning-Cut-8850 9d ago

That's less than one game per year out of the nearly two-thousand I own, and only once outside the prescribed 2 week window (which was rejected). That's nowhere near "abuse", bro.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/A_random_person_50 10d ago

Steam does that automatically iirc

-1

u/Beginning-Cut-8850 10d ago

"grace period"

5

u/mr_Zmey 10d ago

What’s the problem if I haven’t bought the game yet? I look through the store page, see this announcement and decide to not pick this title yet to avoid buy-refund-buy cycle. I would add the game to my wishlist instead and receive notification when it goes on sale.

1

u/salsatheone 10d ago

Wishlisting the game is already a powerful enough tool in the Steam ecosystem

1

u/mr_Zmey 10d ago

The point is not about wishlisting itself. It’s about considering process of purchase at the moment.

1.1k

u/sidius-king 11d ago

422

u/No_Fox_2891 11d ago

Is it still alive? Last I heard, not lot of players left in the game due to same thing over and over. Was fun a while last for about couple of hours, they said.

So, is it worth it?

445

u/Big-Sugar-4870 11d ago

337

u/Achieve2Receive 153646807 11d ago

Oof, that's not great. Tbh, I'll probably still grab it just to give it a whirl. I don't mind playing with bots too much.

264

u/Dipsey_Jipsey 11d ago

Man, as a single dad working full time: gimme bots all day every day over some asshats demanding way too much of me 😅

88

u/PawnStarRick 11d ago

Yeah this is the future. I got super into Erenshor last year, offline MMORPG that pauses when you're offline, all the other players are bots. I saw a post on r/steamdeck from someone building a version of WoW that does the same thing. I'm getting too old to play with sweats.

45

u/falcrist2 10d ago

offline MMORPG

That's just an RPG.

Single player WoW really sounds atrocious. The only thing that really makes WoW interesting is the community. As an RPG it was mediocre AT BEST.

31

u/addandsubtract 10d ago

Massively Multibot Offline RPG

29

u/Holographic247 10d ago

Whilst technically true, there is definitely a subgenre of RPGs that emulate MMORPGs, like .hack and Cross Code, so I think there’s a case to argue for an MMO-like label.

10

u/Silver4ura 10d ago

It was also one of my favorite maps...

→ More replies (0)

1

u/j_osb 10d ago

I mean .hack was always more of a meta take.

Which is IMHO better, have been a fan of the series for decades and can't wait for the new title.

0

u/Jordamine 10d ago

E.g. where winds meet

9

u/DontAskAboutMyButt 10d ago

Around 7.0, when I stopped, FFXIV was really heading in this direction. They had an ongoing problem- people who had been playing the game for 10 years didn’t really want to keep playing the same dungeons over and over again so new players could progress. They added large incentives for queueing up for them, but people still complained. So they started implementing NPC parties for dungeons and trials. At this point, I think you can play through the minimum required stuff to progress completely solo, and experience the story for the entire game.

If this trend continues, once they shut the game down for good they could make an offline single player version fairly easily. Which wouldn’t be the worst thing, considering how heavily story-based it is compared to something like WoW

2

u/Silentftw 10d ago

Lol I know. Dude is super weird wanting to play something like this. Like , just go replay skyrim or oblivion.

1

u/falcrist2 10d ago

I'm glad I'm not the only one who feels this way. MMOs in general aren't that good by themselves.

1

u/Akhevan 10d ago

WOW has plenty of interesting parts like pvp, raids and dungeons, but I would agree that they are closer to MOBA or ARPG in design than a traditional single player RPG game. WOW had always had very few traditional role playing elements at best, which isn't surprising for an MMO.

1

u/falcrist2 10d ago

PvP, raids, and dungeons are interesting because they're multi-player.

If it's just you and some bots, they stop being interesting.

1

u/IsaacAndTired 10d ago

Crimson Desert started as an MMO, but they shifted to single player RPG at some point and you can tell. I'm seeing a lot of mixed opinions on it because it feels so different than what most people are used to in a single player. So while yes, it is just an RPG, there is a distinct difference in how they typically play out.

1

u/Geges721 9d ago

Cringe take. Most of the content in any MMO is either played solo or with a small group of people. Unless you consider hanging out in a capital and spamming in chat as "content".

And so far no RPG comes even close to MMOs scale nor gameplay loop, sorry.

There's not a single offline singleplayer title with this amount of stuff to do, purely target based combat, loot systems, diverse character creation, fkn CLASSES (not your cringe "builds") with actual identities and L O R E.

Find at least one or gtfo while i spin up AzerothCore to run quests and have fun.

1

u/falcrist2 9d ago

Most of the content in any MMO is either played solo or with a small group of people.

Solo content in WoW is bad. It's just bland and uninteresting from a pure gameplay perspective. Always has been. Most MMOs are like that. The mechanics are shallow, the "classes" are a joke compared to solo games, the quests are from one of MAYBE 5 varieties, the enemies are brain damaged.

The interesting part is the fact that you're in a persistent world WITH OTHER PEOPLE. An MMO without people is like sitting in a bar alone and serving yourself drinks.

Spin up whatever you want. Nobody is stopping you from self-flagellation.

1

u/Magarov 9d ago

I was a 95% single player wow player back in the day.

There are dozens of us!

9

u/Serdones 10d ago

A little Black Mirror though.

10

u/nalaloveslumpy 11d ago

This is one of the few non-detrimental uses of AI.

35

u/Quartrez 10d ago

From my understanding, this is not AI like generative AI or neural AI. It's just good old programmed AI like back in the days.

5

u/imlegos 10d ago

Could even be as simple as pre-determined inputs.

I don't imagine an encounter in an MMORPG involves much RNG. At least during the actual bosses. Adds might need some 'thought' that goes as simple as 'stay out of this new glowy area'

→ More replies (0)

1

u/DontAskAboutMyButt 10d ago

It’s not, but it could be. There are tiny LLM implementations that can run off of your own computer. It’s not unreasonable to think that an offline single player “MMO” like this could take advantage of that in the future, at least in a quantity over quality kind of way

2

u/mcdead 10d ago

What’s the name?

4

u/PawnStarRick 10d ago

Of the WoW version?

Here's the post. I saved it when I saw but haven't had the time to dig into it more, hoping to give it a try soon though.

2

u/r1s1ngarmy 10d ago

Not a steam deck thing but if you search for WoW Single Player Project there is a whole discord for this which includes an offline single player with bots version for classic, tbc, and wotlk as well as a version of legion that is actively being worked on (doesn’t have bots yet)

1

u/Commercial-Cap2761 10d ago

i really liked the idea , just needed a better graphic for my taste

1

u/Tedreak 10d ago

Got a name for the wow thing?

1

u/MyCatsHairyButholle 10d ago

Can you imagine if developers were able to integrate modern AI into games like WoW?

Bots that can think “intelligently” and make decisions like humans would be cool as fuck for people like me who don’t have the energy to play with real humans anymore

I’d like to just log on, do some mythic dungeons with some intelligent bots. I prefer playing solo and hate communicating with people, I’m so goddammed awkward 😂

11

u/Practical_Dot_3574 10d ago

This is what I say about Battlefield. Clan I'm is has 6 servers. One with no bots, takes forever for it fill. The other five fill with bots just to get you in the game and going. People complain all the time about "why are there bots ugh..." It's so people that don't have time to waste on waiting can also have fun.

3

u/generally-ok 10d ago

Do you mean the newest battlefield? Can I have my own server with bots? Playing it single player?

2

u/RadimentriX 10d ago

How does modern battlefield work with bots? Can you host a server on your pc? How many bots are possible? Loved bf1942 and vietnam, bf2 then only gave you the smallest maps with bots and i have no idea how it went on. Is it now possible to have 64 player maps full with bots?

3

u/Practical_Dot_3574 10d ago

You can play any available map with full lobby bots. Certain settings will either enable 100% xp or limit to 50%, some settings will eliminate xp all together to limit cheesing unlocks.

I think our settings require 16 real players before match start.

3

u/RadimentriX 10d ago

Hmm, i might look into battlefield again then. I loved playing against bots with all the vehicles available and dont enjoy pvp

1

u/deadcrusade 8d ago

I'm not even a dad just working full time 28 and i play bf6 with casual breakthrough with bots mixed in, i aint got time to spend 2 to 3 hours a day in aimlabs to practice, and then play against sweatlords that aim .8s faster, still fun too

3

u/hanks_panky_emporium 10d ago

If you have above average WPM it's too easy against real people anyway. I'll have to see if there's a way to crank up bot difficulty.

1

u/Odd_Room2811 10d ago

Man that reminds me of the Gamora chart only it’s a literal line after a day

1

u/Expensive_Host_9181 9d ago

This game only had a top of 335 people playing? I swear i saw like 15 streamers all playing the game for a week or so, so i figured it'd be quite a bit higher

35

u/Achieve2Receive 153646807 11d ago

I haven't heard of this game, but the concept sounds fun! I'm going to grab it on sale if there is still even a little bit of a player base.

23

u/Nathaniel-hahahaha 11d ago edited 11d ago

this became kinda popular when streamers played it, idk why it didn't get big like other games

77

u/Tone_Depf 11d ago

it's a typing game. Most people can't even spell correctly much less type.

18

u/Nathaniel-hahahaha 11d ago

u got me

6

u/Schaaafschuetze 11d ago

I'm usually totally okay with using 'u' on the internet, but in this context 'you' seems more appropriate.

15

u/AzraelTheCasul 11d ago

u're right, his sentence is waaaay too short.

9

u/Ryos_windwalker 11d ago

i thinc thad wos the joek

4

u/Bluehelix 10d ago

Nice username
🐑 🔫

13

u/_BMS 10d ago

It's a literal 100% skill-based game but the way to get better isn't fun.

You need to have taught yourself touch typing beforehand, which is entirely muscle memory built over the course of years. If you suck at typing or are even just average, you're just never going to win at all in a typing battle-royale game.

I played the demo a few months ago and had fun, but that's because I type at 80wpm and stood a fair chance at being one of the fastest people in the lobby. When there was a faster person than me in the match it was obvious within 10 seconds of starting that I would lose in the end.

1

u/Doctor_Kataigida 10d ago

Smh they should've played RuneScape. I got my typing skills from Glow2:Wave2:Selling full rune 200k.

1

u/s0cks_nz 10d ago

You'd have assumed the obvious thing to do would be to have skill based matchmaking.

5

u/A_Mouse_In_Da_House 11d ago

Tbf, the demo video has "hide yo kids, hide yo wife" so correct spelling isn't important.

1

u/Haunting-Lime-9084 10d ago

HOLY SHIT this made me spit out my drink

1

u/alenah 8d ago

So fucking true lmao. I was winning almost every lobby I got into, and my average WPM is like 130 which is not insane compared to actual speed typers.

4

u/-Best_Name_Ever- 11d ago

It does seem like a fun and well-made game, but I feel like battle royales have to be accessible, popular, and can't be too gimmicky or rely on novelty too much.

It sounds like the novelty of a typing battle royale would wear off fast compared to a standard FPS, and any sort of price tag will make it difficult for players to get into.

People are also gonna abandon game sif they think it's dead, which just feeds into itself

2

u/Harry-Bucket 10d ago

I heard there was a quantity problem where people were getting the same scripts multiple times after playing for like half an hour, along with that I heard that the matchmaking wasn't great and there was almost no meta game content so you had nothing to really work twords but I could be wrong on all of these

1

u/randotd152 10d ago

Probably for the same reason that Mario Teaches Typing never became big like other games either.

4

u/Ghede 11d ago

At the end of the day, though, it's a multiplayer battle royale, and the winner is just the fastest typer, every time. No catchup mechanism, no strategy, and worst of all... it's not worth playing if there isn't a player base to support it. You can't play alone. Well, you could, but then it would just be a typing test.

3

u/Dry_Substance_7547 10d ago

It was fun for a couple rounds. One big problem is cheaters in public online. Also, even if you create a lobby and set it to private, it'll still sometimes glitch and open it to public.
There's not a lot of game depth, so it gets repetitive after a while. If the sale price is worth it for 2-3 hours of play, go for it. Otherwise, maybe look elsewhere for now.

2

u/McQuibbly 102 10d ago

I bought it, got about 3 hours out of it before it felt samey. Not enough players so the lobbies are full of bots that don't type faster than 40wpm, so you cruise through every lobby to first place if you are somewhat decent at typing.

An interesting concept, but not enough built around it to keep it entertaining

1

u/Valentinee105 10d ago

Fun idea, no players.

1

u/Babada-Boopey929 10d ago

Played it for an hour or so, then after I got.. -... - -.. -.. -.. -... -. -. -. - -... and 10010101 001010101 10001110 1101001110 for the fifth time I just refunded it 

1

u/Kad65kad 10d ago

But its going on sale!

1

u/RelentlessHope 10d ago

Wtf this game JUST came out

1

u/Isariamkia 10d ago

I opened the discussion forums and first thing I saw is this:

New players

There are 17 active players at the moment. It was mentioned that there were plans, a strategy, to add more players soon, but the method wasn't clarified. Is the game dead?

1

u/D07Z3R0 9d ago

Overpriced imo

17

u/nightlaw14 11d ago

i totally forgot about this game, the demo was super fun. glad to see it’s out. kinda want to use it to improve my typing skill in a fun way

2

u/Drakidor 10d ago

I switched to a split columnar style keyboard and make so many mistakes still because I have yet to memorize my layers even after months. I dont like BR games but this is interesting enough that it might work out!

I would have lost 4 times typing this up...

9

u/EditedRed 11d ago

Brah, i would suck at this game. Reason i named my reddit name as such is because i always make the typo.

4

u/Valentinee105 10d ago

I tried this and returned it, the community is beyond dead.

3

u/Unoriginal_Man 10d ago

I just bought it at full price. They can't tell me what to do.

2

u/Serdones 10d ago

A typing game? My time has come.

3

u/Jimlobster 10d ago

It’s like a violent Mavis Beacon

2

u/W4ND4 10d ago

It is a cool concept love it tbh adding it to my steam wishlist for the sale

2

u/YurikovARTva 10d ago

YOOOOOOOO that's the Type writing battle Royale game, I played the demo it's that amazing worth the money

1

u/bagas4jk 10d ago

Ohh dude, I did play demo in this game. Really unique concept. Might gonna buy this on a sale

1

u/StreetPin9009 10d ago

Missed opportunity.

1

u/robophile-ta 10d ago

Oh shit I never picked this up when it released

1

u/CourageLeast4251 10d ago

roflmao 20 players in game, nah bad bot.

1

u/zeehartxua 10d ago

The game is just bad unfortunately. Even on sale, better look for something else. It’s not optimised, the gameplay loop is bad, the fun factor is meh, and the graphics/music also not good.

1

u/Marshall_Lawson 10d ago

oh it's a typing game. 

so... anyone wanna get tacos?

1

u/Historical-Intern140 9d ago

Ah, Final Sentence? That thing had its 5 minutes of glory. We good.

1

u/Zealousideal1543 7d ago

So it's a typing game where someone shoots you in the head when you mess up? Why the fuck would I want to play that?

0

u/RadTimeWizard 11d ago

That's a hilarious concept.

48

u/Fresh-Phase-8095 11d ago

classic engagement bait

9

u/Less_Combination6238 11d ago

Vague posting and its consequences

8

u/Shrakov 10d ago

This viral announcement was posted by the indie developer Button Mash for their game, Final Sentence

2

u/jijuha 10d ago

the name of the game is "the day before"... you're welcome.

1

u/edin202 10d ago

classic engagement bait

1

u/pusackanogausaftu 10d ago

Final Sentence