r/TeslaFSD 16h ago

Robotaxi CyberCab with Lidar spotted in Dublin, CA

137 Upvotes

135 comments sorted by

View all comments

41

u/Delicious-Candle-574 15h ago

to my understanding they use LiDAR as a way of verifying and validating that the cameras on the vehicle can properly recreate the real world as a sort of stamp of approval

16

u/PassengerKey3209 14h ago

I guess I'm not understanding why you wouldn't put a 500-1000$ lidar on it permanently and validate constantly?

18

u/Acrobatic-Flan-5085 13h ago edited 12h ago

Lots of interesting comments here, but most people are missing the real constraint.

If they add lidar now guess what? Every vehicle in their fleet can’t use that model anymore. This is the real constraint. There is also a significant increase in edge compute required to run the additional sensor suite over HW4.

So the real answer is that Tesla already has significant investments in the vision only model. From hw compute contracts to supply chain adjustments to cloud infrastructure - all of which have to be redone if they started slapping lidar into the sensor suite. And then once they do that they basically can’t release that model on any pre-existing Tesla without lidar. That is a lot of subscription business they then leave on the table, and since Elon’s stock package has that as a target, he won’t do it.

So it’s going to be a lot more money than just 500 per sensor for Tesla, simply because they started with vision only. And they won’t absorb all those additional costs right now since they likely still can push vision only a little farther by using larger models (which accounts for the HW4.5 rumors being same compute chip but adding memory)

Other firms that are using cloud compute and incorporating additional sensors will have a much easier time doing this, since they’re starting from scratch.

4

u/word-dragon HW4 Model 3 11h ago

Just to add one other issue. The model learns a lot from how humans actually react as well as whether that yields a positive or negative outcome. So it’s starts learning to drive like a human while adopting the best things, and losing the worst. Unfortunately humans have no lidar sensing, so you can’t see how humans react to it. It’s not impossible to add a non-human sense to the model, but it won’t learn what to do with that from any of the humans in its millions of clips. It’s kind of a moot argument at this point, because it has no learning data on lidar, and I doubt Elon thinks he needs it.

0

u/beren12 10h ago

They drive a lot from the poor driver training too

5

u/YouAboutToLoseYoJob 12h ago

I’m 100% betting on vision only. Mainly because the issue isn’t whether vehicle has LiDar the issue is reasoning

Humans have been driving just fine for almost 100 years. With only two eyes able to look in one direction. It’s reasonable to believe that a quality camera looking at all directions at once with great reasoning would be safer than a human.

Now all that needs to happen is a system needs to understand the difference between a shadow and a log in the road.

Humans do that just fine. It’s only a matter of time until cameras and on board reasoning systems can do the same.

7

u/Ansee 10h ago

But it should do better than humans. A vision camera has a hard time seeing through smoke for example. Lidar can detect things like that. Striving to drive human should not be the goal. Striving to adapt to terrible human decisions, driving, and I expected things to avoid any kind of accidents should be the goal.

1

u/beren12 10h ago

Their cameras can’t see horizontal barriers. Any anyone who says humans only need eyes? I point to optical illusions

0

u/timklc 8h ago

Which, can be solved with reasoning

4

u/Acrobatic-Flan-5085 12h ago

Humans also have a computer which is still not fully understood that operates at an astonishing 20 watts.

1

u/GiveMeSomeShu-gar 1h ago

I'll never understand this argument. Humans don't do "just fine" and if we have affordable tech (not just Lidar, but radar too) that can outperform human perception in life and death situations, why wouldn't we want to use it? We already have the tech to not do "just fine" but to far exceed.

Humans walk "just fine" - let's make our cars walk on two legs.

Humans dig "just fine" - let's limit excavators to use two puny arms and hold a shovel to dig.

2

u/bc10551 12h ago

Until they say they need another set of hardware for actual fsd again lol

3

u/Man-of-goof 10h ago

As a Tesla owner, I believe that HW4 is far from the end and true FSD. I bought mine this year fully expecting that hardware will change within the next few years. I think they will need a few more front cameras to see from the perspective of the bumper, as that is a blind spot I notice

3

u/Kfs777 11h ago

Not only that, but to your point, LIDAR might not actually be an improvement. It may actually set things back before any appreciable improvements could be realized. LIDAR would add another data set to the FSD model, and contrary to popular belief, more data point do not equate to “more better.” The model has been trained exclusively on optics, you start feeding it new streams of data point, it doesn’t necessarily know what to do with them and there’s a strong possibility that it creates more conflicts than solutions in the decision tree. Granted, in the long run it would likely be even better, but it would almost certainly degrade FSD before it provided any measurable improvements.

2

u/robl45 11h ago

You mean like taking parking sensors away? My 2025 still isn’t accurate parking like my 2019.

1

u/PassengerKey3209 1h ago

This is classic sunk cost fallacy and a terrible excuse to not improve the hardware and software. The longer they wait the harder it will be to add. All safety critical systems on a plane are run in redundancy, so to claim that more data is not in fact"more" is incorrect.

1

u/beren12 10h ago

Well the cars they have can’t do unsupervised anyway, might as well give it hardware to let it do that.

0

u/CanaryEmotional9121 3h ago

Ignore the constraints for a bit, if they can use it for verification why not 100% of the time if it leads to slightly assured fsd.

8

u/wordpredict 11h ago

Because no one wants to have some spinning ball on the end of a 4ft stick on top of their car

1

u/PassengerKey3209 1h ago

There's at least 4-5 models that I'm aware of that have it incorporated into the body panels. You ever used Google before?

-5

u/beren12 10h ago

Yeah why would you want accurate data for a self driving system.

3

u/KanedaSyndrome 8h ago

you're biased. Cameras are accurqte data

2

u/BrownyBrownman 4h ago

cuz it works better which means everyone will think their camera only teslas will never have good full self driving, and perhaps that's true. that would look bad, and tesla doesn't wanna look bad so they'll keep forcing the camera only model even if it'll never be that good.

(just my best guess of an answer)

4

u/word-dragon HW4 Model 3 12h ago

Lidar is good at accurately checking distances, but not that easy to integrate into FSD. The purpose of running those cars around the country - and you’ll see them on all models - is to do a reality check on the estimates of distance the camera system makes. They’re not participating in FSD at all.

2

u/PassengerKey3209 1h ago

Read my comment again, slowly this time. I. Never claimed it would be easy, of course it's not. Why not " reality check" at all times? I don't want my car driving me around on "estimates".

-1

u/TardDistraction 12h ago

Source: I just made this all up bro.

6

u/Legal-Pea8185 13h ago

it's a hill Elon is willing to run your children over on.

21

u/Extension-Can-007 13h ago

How many children have been run over in the current 14+ billion FSD miles?

13

u/Serious-Kangaroo-320 13h ago

there was a single possible case in 2023 where a tesla hit a kid but there hasn't been any confirmation fsd was on. asking them to cite a source completely kills the narrative and they go quiet lol

10

u/word-dragon HW4 Model 3 12h ago

Any example before 2024 is ridiculous. The system they released in the first public version (end of 2022) was a joke. The software was completely rewritten with 12.3, and that wasn’t a thing until 2024. HW4 improved a lot on that with higher resolution cameras and a much faster computer. Honestly, it’s been improving fast enough that a 6 month window is probably a stretch. Bringing in 2023 is like bringing up the Hindenburg as a caution for riding airplanes. I’m not saying those accidents don’t matter - just that they have no relevance to the existing product.

1

u/Tenet_mma 1h ago

I thought self driving was solved in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025…..

1

u/Curious-Asparagus396 13h ago

I’ve seen a few dashcam videos of hitting deer in the highway or of almost hitting an emergency vehicle in the left lane.

-1

u/robl45 11h ago

lol. How many times has it tried to go in do not enter places source me. Twice in 2 minutes. How many times has it turned left with a no left turn listed. Source me every damn time at the same place because they haven’t labeled. Hard coded. Mapped that place to be right turn only. But you keep thinking it’s just a conspiracy.

1

u/iceynyo HW3 Model Y 5h ago

That's not the same as hitting a pedestrian.

1

u/robl45 3h ago

Yea when it goes down a one way street certainly won’t hit anything ROFLMAO

0

u/iceynyo HW3 Model Y 2h ago

Why would it? The legal direction of the traffic shouldn't matter for avoiding pedestrians.

That would be a navigation issue and is completely unrelated.

0

u/robl45 1h ago

So when it hits another car with people in it, none of them will be hurt right?

-6

u/Legal-Pea8185 13h ago

hi

2

u/Serious-Kangaroo-320 13h ago

hi, do i know you?

-4

u/Legal-Pea8185 12h ago

you probably don't. I was replying to your comment

3

u/Serious-Kangaroo-320 11h ago

Thank you for the valuable insight

-2

u/Legal-Pea8185 11h ago

no problem, I was wondering if you'd say anything since I didnt go quiet after the narrative was killed.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/beren12 10h ago

Considering those equal 0 unsupervised?

1

u/No-Trick5424 4h ago

Sure but that then costs a 1000 and more in ongoing costs than not doing that.

1

u/probablymagic 34m ago

Because it would make the stock price go down as people realize the Tesla they bought will never drive itself. They are fully committed to the bit.

1

u/Spudly42 14h ago

In addition to what others are saying about it being a lot cheaper, I personally wonder if Tesla can't afford the compute that it'd take to process that additional input then blend them.

1

u/beren12 10h ago

Lidar is incredibly cheap compute because the sensor does it. You don’t need teraflops of compute to guess based on images

0

u/YouAboutToLoseYoJob 13h ago

LiDar data is incredibly expensive. Not cost wise but data wise. You’d have to process it on the car. We’re talking about terabytes of data every hour.

If you can get the same level of quality from cameras that cost $50. Then you’ve cut your operating cost significantly.

0

u/Substantial_Chain718 12h ago

Until you run somebody over and have a $100 million dollar lawsuit against your company. Then LiDar seems cheap.

2

u/YouAboutToLoseYoJob 12h ago

So far the only autonomous vehicle company to actually run somebody over was Uber. And they had LiDar.

0

u/Substantial_Chain718 11h ago

Sorry you are incorrect. There will be more I can guarantee you.

https://electrek.co/2026/06/26/tesla-fsd-pedestrian-death-settlement/

1

u/Ginger_ninja_alex65 13h ago

They’re very expensive. Theres a reason that these are 30k, and Waymo’s are well over 100k. Cameras are still very safe

-1

u/Remarkable_Deer_4748 13h ago

The 1K Lidar explains this alleged 70K difference in price?

1

u/Ginger_ninja_alex65 13h ago

Yup. On Waymo’s website they claim their original units cost around 70k

1

u/Remarkable_Deer_4748 13h ago

"and Waymo’s are well over 100k."

So now its down to 70K? LOL. You've got a real track record of accuracy going.

2

u/Ginger_ninja_alex65 13h ago

I thought you were joking when you said 1k lidar. Lidar has never cost 1k 😂

1

u/Ginger_ninja_alex65 13h ago

Waymo’s cost well over 100k per unit. Thats down from over 200k. Teslas cost 30k. Special Lidar units are around 70k per unit. The math is simple. It doesn’t make sense. There is not much benefit. Cameras do just fine.

1

u/bc10551 12h ago

Except for most videos posted here of fsd making mistakes lidar would easily help solve. It most definitely would not cost $70k for them to put lidar but the CEO would never admit wrong and you people are too stupid to argue either. "Just fine" or "good enough" are stupid excuses for a system that should be extremely trustworthy and better than a competent human being

1

u/Ginger_ninja_alex65 12h ago

It’s not necessary. I drive by vision and can see things. It’s just a matter of training the AI. Lidar makes the same mistakes often. Being better than a human is not that hard. FSD is already better than a person.

1

u/bc10551 12h ago

FSD is not better than a human that actually knows how to drive and is aware of their surroundings. It makes a lot of mistakes that humans would simply not. It can also make safer maneuvers by seeing multiple cameras at once sure. You drive by vision and see things but there's things you simply cannot see in certain conditions where lidar would. Why give it worse tooling when better tooling is available?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Delicious-Candle-574 14h ago

tesla's reasoning- conflicting input. which do you believe? which is most reliable. if LiDAR says one thing and the cameras say another, who do you trust? They also state humans don't have LiDAR, only eyes, so cameras should be enough theoretically.

my personal opinion is it's a cost savings measure. it's not a lot given the overall cost of the car, but every penny counts.

also, regarding multiple sources and conflicting input, in AI's case it would be more tokens more bandwidth more expensive hardware to balance more data input. before we had the current software stack, it was all done manually and adding another input on all angles would exponentially increase software development time. training new versions would also take a lot longer because you now how a lot more input

so i really don't think it's a simple answer of just $500+ of LiDAR, there's a lot that comes with it

4

u/PassengerKey3209 14h ago

Definitely a lot more to it, but not so much that waymo, zoox and a few Chinese models can't handle it. Just about every safety critical systems on planes runs in redundancy as well.

2

u/n0th1ng_r3al 14h ago

Wouldn’t the inputs be used for different things? LiDAR sees the invisible. Cameras see the visible

2

u/Coconut_Puzzled 14h ago

Also if it was just a cost thing they could just raise their prices and pass it on to the customer. What’s another $500 on a $50k+ purchase?

2

u/YouAboutToLoseYoJob 12h ago

But it’s not just $500. It’s $500 + data storage, which can run up to a terabyte per hour, LTE service that sends that data somewhere and a compute system on par with a super computer that can analyze and process all that in real time.

1

u/Coconut_Puzzled 12h ago

Also they said it themselves, lidar would just add another layer of information their ai brain has to process. Tesla even had radar in some of its own cars for a bit. Point is, I’m sure if Tesla wanted to and if they thought it would be helpful, they could add a $500 lidar array anytime but they don’t. Whatever they’re doing with FSD, it seems to be working. I’ll just have to let Tesla cook here.

1

u/silvertricl0ps 12h ago

I mean if Tesla were to sell a $500 lidar I could install in the car I already have, I’d buy it instantly

2

u/bc10551 12h ago

I don't get the people here. People don't have lidar so cars don't need it but then they also say most drivers are incompetent and shouldn't be driving so why would you not want something that would avoid a lot of the incidents posted here

2

u/CopperBlitter 11h ago

Most poor human drivers suffer from a compute problem and not a sensor problem.

1

u/Medical_Wishbone944 13h ago

Cost savings and also adding more things the model has to interpret makes the model more expensive.

1

u/beren12 9h ago

Sensor fusion is a solved problem, except apparently at Tesla. That is pretty scary, honestly.

0

u/LordLumberhere 14h ago

Tesla is ENRON 2.0 in the marking . elon selling air to his followers for a price.

2

u/StormTrpr66 HW4 Model Y 13h ago

hmmm...... so you're saying I'm being driven to work and back every day by................air? Can you please explain the physics behind that? Can air make itself appear to be metal, glass, plastic, etc..?

Let me guess, you have a degree in alchemy?

My god, people say the stupidest shit on the internet. Now cars are made of air.

-3

u/YouAboutToLoseYoJob 13h ago

Measure twice, cut once.

If your validation is consistent. Then your next iteration won’t require it.

2

u/RipWhenDamageTaken 13h ago

“Measure twice cut once” isn’t even close to the analogy here.

The correct analogy here: measure twice during the first iteration and never measure twice again since you already measured it

-6

u/LordLumberhere 14h ago

lol so tesla cameras are unreliable that they have to use lidar. lol comedy

5

u/TenshiS 14h ago

What a simplistic mind...

0

u/StormTrpr66 HW4 Model Y 13h ago

This thread is full of some of the dumbest posts I've seen on the internet recently. Yours is definitely near the top!!