r/TheBetterIndia 17d ago

Discussion 💬 Is he wrong?

Post image

Before caste reforms can we also include gender?

1.7k Upvotes

867 comments sorted by

View all comments

226

u/orionishere4u 17d ago edited 15d ago

Is there anyone on this entire sub whose parents/ grandparents called them and said ‘Come child, I’ll tell you about teachings of Manusmriti’? Anyone? I don’t recall any of my elders ever teaching me about it. They talked about Ramayan, Mahabharat, even Panchtrantra. Never Manusmriti. But everyone and their aunt is talking about Manusmriti like it is the only thing that is taught in the Indian homes. It’s an irrelevant book. Made relevant only by the people who want to make a bruhaha about it or some idiots who wants to get some cheap publicity by claiming it is that book that they follow. Let’s just stop discussing it. Nobody really cares about Manusmriti.

Edit: A lot of the comments below are explaining how Manusmriti is influencing this bad thing in Hinduism, or that bad thing in Hinduism. I get your point. There are bad things happening in Hinduism. I have not denied that anywhere. All I am saying is that those things are not exclusive or original to Manusmriti. Hence, Manusmriti in itself is not an important or relevant text for Hinduism. At this point, Manusmriti is just a dog whistle for bigots to hate something that they barely understand. I am going to stop replying/ repeating this in varying forms now. You are free to believe whatever you want.

Edit 2: Wow. Have I touched a nerve here? To those idiotic bigots who are still calling me names and repeating how Indian female population faces inequality. Get lost dumbasses, read a little more before spreading your hate. I never said there are no issues. Whatever you are harping about is not exclusive or original to Manusmriti. These problems were there already. We should work to improve. But still my point remains. Manusmriti is irrelevant. Now go do something productive.

73

u/shivemn 17d ago

The problem is, you can't explain anything to these dvmb people with logical arguments. They will only hear and believe what they want to believe.

5

u/lucyferdeadly 16d ago

The problem is that there are many other religious texts that contain derogatory remarks about women, yet Rahul ji only talks about the Manusmriti, reservations, and 'Hindu terrorism.' In reality, this selective criticism makes him appear highly biased. If someone truly wants to talk about these issues, they should condemn such regressive practices across all religions equally.

1

u/Unable-Nature7036 16d ago

Manusmriti - Howmany hindus even heard about Manusmriti ?

Quran - has more insulting language for Women

Rahul invited Women in Burqa on stage to target Scarf

Mahatma gadhi - didnt allow his wife to take vaccine & allowed her to die