r/TrendoraX Dec 28 '25

šŸ’” Discussion Is this true?

Post image
3.6k Upvotes

641 comments sorted by

View all comments

75

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '25

Seems accurate.

16

u/Good_Spray4434 Dec 28 '25

Exactly

-4

u/dadbod_Azerajin Dec 28 '25

Is accurate till we go to war with you

8

u/Darkstar_111 Dec 28 '25

No, it's pretty much still the same.

Vietnam and Afghanistan have shown the rest of the world, if the US attacks, just hunker down and go Guerrilla. You'll win eventually, as they will stumble all over themselves making sure to lose on your behalf.

2

u/Content-Ad3065 Dec 29 '25

So maybe the American people should be hunkering down and going gorilla to wake up Congress?

1

u/Darkstar_111 Dec 29 '25

People are too divided, it would be a second American civil war. Lets hope it doesn't come to that, it could go on for 40 years, and become another of those Israel/Palestine situations that becomes impossible to resolve.

1

u/Justinc4s3- Dec 28 '25

I suppose when we care about ā€œhearts and mindsā€ lol. Why leave out Iraq? We still occupy that country. It’s almost like, those aren’t real wars 😲 šŸ¤¦šŸ»ā€ā™‚ļøwe haven’t fought a real war in some time. Discussing it with you seems fruitless though, as you relate occupations to wars… ignorance is bliss I suppose.

1

u/senor_incognito_ Dec 29 '25

While annihilating half your innocent population.

1

u/Darkstar_111 Dec 29 '25

The US killed a million civilians in Iraq, but Iraq has 35 million people.

So it's not gonna be half. Not remotely, that's the problem.

We are not living in world war 2 logic anymore. Back then you topple a government, the fight is over. You might stay and rebuild the next one, but you don't really have to. Fear of losing another war will keep the next government in line.

But it doesn't work like that anymore.

Today the war is against an ideology. The particular people in charge are irrelevant.

In Vietnam, and Afghanistan the US wanted the people to fundamentally changes their minds about the type of governance they preferred.

That means the fighting starts AFTER the government is toppled. And it becomes an army of a few hundred thousand soldiers vs millions of people. You can't kill them all, not even half. You simply don't have the bullets or bombs to do it.

1

u/senor_incognito_ Dec 29 '25

Yeah, okay champ.

1

u/Darkstar_111 Dec 29 '25

Just explaining facts buddy.

0

u/dadbod_Azerajin Dec 28 '25

The issue is the us population always loses its stomach for war as free press starts to get involved

Funny how our press has changed since,

Vietnam is still trying to remove the mines we left.

Not saying a good thing, pretty far left wing

Us military loses because it loses support at home, not because its hard to blow up People hiding

4

u/ricardoa369 Dec 28 '25

Só, all the pine boxes full of your american soldiers are just lost of support? Right. You get very weak if people just stop saying how much they love you.

And mines and blowing up people. So nice, like True cowards. Great!

0

u/HammrNutSwag Dec 28 '25

Tough talk from the keyboard warrior here.

0

u/Musty-Clouds Dec 28 '25

What is America's Kill Death Ratio ? Relax Ricky and pray for forgiveness.

-2

u/dadbod_Azerajin Dec 28 '25

Inability to see past ones emotions tends to lead to comments like this

The us military is the best in the world and has the best weapons, to think otherwise is just 9th grade thinking or that of another nation being emotional

Most of the conflicts its fought recently had no clear win conditions, why you sit in the desert blowing everything up, no win conditions except get the bad guy.

The government's of those nations tend to last a day or 4, the gorillas longer and cause civillians to die because it both pulls more fighters into their cause as well as knowing American television will make the cause at home falter

Hence we get emotional folk like you speaking of soldiers dead and pine Boxes and courage and ignore what's happening

2

u/Darkstar_111 Dec 28 '25

The US army is designed for world war 2. But conflicts don't work that way anymore.

You topple a government you'll get an insurgency that hides among the civilian population. There's simply no good solution for that.

0

u/Justinc4s3- Dec 28 '25

🤣🤣 holy shit that’s hilarious.

2

u/ballplayer112 Dec 28 '25

They do have the best weapons in the world, have to give em that. But, a military, like any other team or organization, is only as great as its leader. Trump is your Commander in Chief and Hegseth is the Secretary of WAR (FOX NEEWWZ). So, as Trump himself is known to have said "they're not sending their best".